Call of Duty: Ghosts Review Thread (The King is Back)

PhazonBlazer · 2013-11-04 07:30:49

That's right folks, the king of the first person shooter genre is back once again. Infinity Ward has really outdone themselves this year by using the power of next-gen consoles, providing the most realistic cutting-edge graphics seen in a shooter. This installment of Call of Duty will also be the most innovative of all First-person Shooters. So, what will Call of Duty Ghosts score on Gamespot?

uninspiredcup

Follow

59087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#151 uninspiredcup

Member since 2013 • 59087 Posts

@lostrib said:

@uninspiredcup said:

@lostrib said:

@seanmcloughlin said:

I knew it would score well

Batman AO - Too much of the same 6/10

CoD:Ghosts - A lot of the same but it's CoD 8/10

actually the review seems to imply they changed quite a few things, obviously though they are completely different kinds of games so that might have something to do with it.

Origins added an entire (optional) multiplayer game. And changed many aspects for the better such as detective mode.

many reviewers seemed to disagree

Yet a billion dollar franchise they change there tune. Funny that.

10 years ago

lostrib

Follow

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#152 Edited By lostrib

Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Animal-Mother said:

@lostrib said:

@uninspiredcup said:

@lostrib said:

@seanmcloughlin said:

I knew it would score well

Batman AO - Too much of the same 6/10

CoD:Ghosts - A lot of the same but it's CoD 8/10

actually the review seems to imply they changed quite a few things, obviously though they are completely different kinds of games so that might have something to do with it.

Origins added an entire (optional) multiplayer game. And changed many aspects for the better such as detective mode.

many reviewers seemed to disagree

It doesn't change the inconsistency of the site though.

At it's core Call of Duty is the fundamentally.

fundamentally what? They are games in two entirely different genres, and reviewed by completely different people.

10 years ago

Animal-Mother

Follow

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#153 Edited By Animal-Mother

Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

@lostrib said:

@Animal-Mother said:

@lostrib said:

@uninspiredcup said:

@lostrib said:

@seanmcloughlin said:

I knew it would score well

Batman AO - Too much of the same 6/10

CoD:Ghosts - A lot of the same but it's CoD 8/10

actually the review seems to imply they changed quite a few things, obviously though they are completely different kinds of games so that might have something to do with it.

Origins added an entire (optional) multiplayer game. And changed many aspects for the better such as detective mode.

many reviewers seemed to disagree

It doesn't change the inconsistency of the site though.

At it's core Call of Duty is the fundamentally.

fundamentally what? They are games in two entirely different genres, and reviewed by completely different people.

But one gets penalized for having the same core gameplay and elements while one gets an 8.0? You don't see the problem with the consistency of reviews here?

If batman was fundamentally a broken or bad game i'd agree. Buyt Cod comes out adds a new mode and tightens things up 8.0

10 years ago

Seabas989

Follow

13565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#154 Seabas989

Member since 2009 • 13565 Posts

Funny how GS scored it higher then GT. Probably because Shane the COD fanboy left the site.

Anyways I'm not interested in COD Ghosts and BF4.

10 years ago

super600

Follow

33103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#155 super600 Moderator

Member since 2007 • 33103 Posts

@FamilyGuyFan507 said:

I love how Gamespot and IGN favor CoD for appreciating the game it is, and not doing much to change it, but heighten where it is at. Yet, games with better quality (in terms of story) like Batman Arkham Origins gets ripped apart, and BF4 (in terms of Online). I'm tired of reviewers, and the mass media being blinded by these games.

BF4 got ripped apart by reviewers because of it's weak campaign.

10 years ago

Animal-Mother

Follow

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#156 Edited By Animal-Mother

Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

@super600 said:

@FamilyGuyFan507 said:

I love how Gamespot and IGN favor CoD for appreciating the game it is, and not doing much to change it, but heighten where it is at. Yet, games with better quality (in terms of story) like Batman Arkham Origins gets ripped apart, and BF4 (in terms of Online). I'm tired of reviewers, and the mass media being blinded by these games.

BF4 got ripped apart by reviewers because of it's weak campaign.

But still got an 8.0.....

10 years ago

silversix_

Follow

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 silversix_

Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

Its insulting to have games like TLOU get the same score as this piece of shit of a milking rehashness. I like GT's review, for once they delivered and were blunt with it.

10 years ago