Any ps3 multiplats that are better then 360s?

  • 63 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Caramel_Fantasy
Caramel_Fantasy

220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Caramel_Fantasy
Member since 2006 • 220 Posts

After what happen to bayonetta i just dont understand why 360 mps are always the better version. :? Do devs even try:question:

Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
Darksiders and Dragon Age come to mind.
Avatar image for Odrec
Odrec

1897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Odrec
Member since 2009 • 1897 Posts
Dragon Age Origins, Batman AA, Darksiders and others, specially those that are enhanced versions like Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2. The firsts are if we go by the miniscule details that really doesn't matter much which is basically what lemmings call "superior" most of the time. Bayonetta is the exception and it was because Sega did an exceptionally bad job.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Dragon Age
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Dragon Age Origins, Batman AA, Darksiders and others, specially those that are enhanced versions like Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2. The firsts are if we go by the miniscule details that really doesn't matter much which is basically what lemmings call "superior" most of the time. Bayonetta is the exception and it was because Sega did an exceptionally bad job.Odrec
batman aa is better on the 360 i thought
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
[QUOTE="Odrec"]Dragon Age Origins, Batman AA, Darksiders and others, specially those that are enhanced versions like Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2. The firsts are if we go by the miniscule details that really doesn't matter much which is basically what lemmings call "superior" most of the time. Bayonetta is the exception and it was because Sega did an exceptionally bad job.Jandurin
batman aa is better on the 360 i thought

Plays better on 360, has exclusive content on PS3. Personally, I prefer content, hence why I supported the PS2 RE4 over the GC one last gen.
Avatar image for Kashiwaba
Kashiwaba

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Kashiwaba
Member since 2005 • 8059 Posts

Darksidees, Dragon age, Burnout, hmmm thats all what comes to my mind.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

Burnout Paradise springs to mind and oblivion aswell (in some areas) if we go by the things most fanboys would like those comparrasin thingys xD.

Most are bout the same with slight diffrences being honest altho there are exceptions like bayonettta and orange box.

Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts

DA, Darksiders, Fifa 10, Bionic Commando, Wanted: WoF, Terminator S, Tomb Raider Underworld.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Odrec"]Dragon Age Origins, Batman AA, Darksiders and others, specially those that are enhanced versions like Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2. The firsts are if we go by the miniscule details that really doesn't matter much which is basically what lemmings call "superior" most of the time. Bayonetta is the exception and it was because Sega did an exceptionally bad job.Skittles_McGee
batman aa is better on the 360 i thought

Plays better on 360, has exclusive content on PS3. Personally, I prefer content, hence why I supported the PS2 RE4 over the GC one last gen.

Batman plays better because you like 360controller more?

Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="Jandurin"] batman aa is better on the 360 i thoughtaroxx_ab

Plays better on 360, has exclusive content on PS3. Personally, I prefer content, hence why I supported the PS2 RE4 over the GC one last gen.

Batman plays better because you like 360controller more?

No, thats simply what I heard.
Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts
[QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"] Plays better on 360, has exclusive content on PS3. Personally, I prefer content, hence why I supported the PS2 RE4 over the GC one last gen.Skittles_McGee

Batman plays better because you like 360controller more?

No, thats simply what I heard.

So you heard wrong, fps is the same.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#13 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

I got you a list here.:D

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="sayonara89"][QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

Batman plays better because you like 360controller more?

No, thats simply what I heard.

So you heard wrong, fps is the same.

i heard that the 360 version has AA or some nonsense, whereas the PS3 version does not.
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts

I got you a list here.:D

mitu123
They have Darksiders listed as being completely better on 360. Somehow, I think thats mistaken :?
Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts
[QUOTE="sayonara89"][QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"] No, thats simply what I heard.Jandurin
So you heard wrong, fps is the same.

i heard that the 360 version has AA or some nonsense, whereas the PS3 version does not.

MSAAx2 on some edges and SSAO. PS3 version has better self shadows.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="sayonara89"] So you heard wrong, fps is the same.sayonara89
i heard that the 360 version has AA or some nonsense, whereas the PS3 version does not.

MSAAx2 on some edges and SSAO. PS3 version has better self shadows.

what's a self shadow :S
Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts
[QUOTE="mitu123"]

I got you a list here.:D

Skittles_McGee
They have Darksiders listed as being completely better on 360. Somehow, I think thats mistaken :?

IGN and Gamespot comparisons are a joke. Only LoT and DF really matters.
Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts
[QUOTE="sayonara89"][QUOTE="Jandurin"] i heard that the 360 version has AA or some nonsense, whereas the PS3 version does not.Jandurin
MSAAx2 on some edges and SSAO. PS3 version has better self shadows.

what's a self shadow :S

Screenshot number 2 http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=14110
Avatar image for CODnut
CODnut

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 CODnut
Member since 2008 • 47 Posts

Darksiders and Dragon Age come to mind.Skittles_McGee

Well i heard that Dragon Age looked better on PS3 but ran smoother on 360, as for Darksiders i didn't hear anything about it being better on PS3.

Anyway one older game that comes to mind that was much better on PS3 both in graphics and gameplay was Fight Night Round 3. However that was because the dev's put it out on PS3 an entire year later, so they had all that time to improve it, according to popular opinion.

My opinion is 360 architecture is so nearly identical to develop on as PC architecture that it's just a much smoother transition, but PS3 architecture is totally different and much harder and time consuming.

Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="mitu123"]

I got you a list here.:D

sayonara89
They have Darksiders listed as being completely better on 360. Somehow, I think thats mistaken :?

IGN and Gamespot comparisons are a joke. Only LoT and DF really matters.

I'm going to disagree, but anyway thats the strange thing. They used IGN for that comparison.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#22 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

I got you a list here.:D

Skittles_McGee

They have Darksiders listed as being completely better on 360. Somehow, I think thats mistaken :?

Blame IGN, you can see their icon listed next to the game anyways. They suck at doing this, they even said GTA IV is better on PS3 when multiple sites confirmed it's much better on 360 since it had HD support and 2xAA.

Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"]Darksiders and Dragon Age come to mind.CODnut
Well i heard that Dragon Age looked better on PS3 but ran smoother on 360, as for Darksiders i didn't hear anything about it being better on PS3. Anyway one older game that comes to mind that was much better on PS3 both in graphics and gameplay was Fight Night Round 3. However that was because the dev's put it out on PS3 an entire year later, so they had all that time to improve, according to popular opinion. My opinion is 360 architecture is so nearly identical to develop on as PC architecture that it's just a much smoother transition, but PS3 architecture is totally different and much harder and time consuming.

There was enough difference in the two console versions of Dragon Age that the score was actually different. Had to be something fairly tangible. Darksiders has a better framerate and less screen tearing on PS3. It was mentioned in Gamespot's review, for reference.
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion.
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="mitu123"]

I got you a list here.:D

mitu123

They have Darksiders listed as being completely better on 360. Somehow, I think thats mistaken :?

Blame IGN, you can see their icon listed next to the game anyways. They suck at doing this, they even said GTA IV is better on PS3 when multiple sites confirmed it's much better on 360 since it had HD support and 2xAA.

Hm. Never heard about that. Guess that makes sense now, anyway.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="sayonara89"] MSAAx2 on some edges and SSAO. PS3 version has better self shadows.sayonara89
what's a self shadow :S

Screenshot number 2 http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=14110

oh, who cares about cutscenes? All I care is how it looks and plays when I'm actually playing but thanks for the information. it does look better on the ps3 in those cutscenes
Avatar image for hreyhreyy2
hreyhreyy2

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 hreyhreyy2
Member since 2010 • 37 Posts

you have to relize when people mention oblivion and bioshock those games HAD AN EXTRA year of devlopment for the PS3

Avatar image for hreyhreyy2
hreyhreyy2

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 hreyhreyy2
Member since 2010 • 37 Posts

[QUOTE="sayonara89"][QUOTE="Jandurin"] what's a self shadow :SJandurin
Screenshot number 2 http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=14110

oh, who cares about cutscenes? All I care is how it looks and plays when I'm actually playing but thanks for the information. it does look better on the ps3 in those cutscenes

hes a heavy rain fan so cutscene=gameplay

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#29 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
Darksiders and Dragon Age come to mind.Skittles_McGee
Those are 2 very different examples, both of which are misleading. Dragon Age PS3's texture quality was marginally benefitted from the mandatory install possible on the PS3, but at the expense of framerate, which was notably better on 360. And Darksiders 360 is getting patched this week, making the 2 versions (Xbox and PS3) intentical. If you wanted to buy Darksiders on day one, as I did, you got the PS3 version, but the week after it launched, everyone will be having the same experience. With Dragon Age, you have to ask yourself if you preffer better textures or framerate. So it's not as cut and dry as you make it out to be. As everyone here knows the 360 generally has superior multiplatform games graphically... just check out Gamestops Multiplatform comparison screenshots if you doubt this.
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"]Darksiders and Dragon Age come to mind.donalbane
Those are 2 very different examples, both of which are misleading. Dragon Age PS3's texture quality was marginally benefitted from the mandatory install possible on the PS3, but at the expense of framerate, which was notably better on 360. And Darksiders 360 is getting patched this week, making the 2 versions (Xbox and PS3) intentical. If you wanted to buy Darksiders on day one, as I did, you got the PS3 version, but the week after it launched, everyone will be having the same experience. With Dragon Age, you have to ask yourself if you preffer better textures or framerate. So it's not as cut and dry as you make it out to be. As everyone here knows the 360 generally has superior multiplatform games graphically... just check out Gamestops Multiplatform comparison screenshots if you doubt this.

I thought the patch was only fixing the screen tearing, which still leaves the framerate. I just mention Dragon Age because there had to be a fairly substantial difference to score one higher than the other.
Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#31 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="sayonara89"] Screenshot number 2 http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=14110hreyhreyy2

oh, who cares about cutscenes? All I care is how it looks and plays when I'm actually playing but thanks for the information. it does look better on the ps3 in those cutscenes

hes a heavy rain fan so cutscene=gameplay

Don't knock heavy rain... the cutscenes are incredibly dynamic. Your comparing 2 very different genres, so you your critisizm is completely unfounded.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"]Darksiders and Dragon Age come to mind.donalbane
Those are 2 very different examples, both of which are misleading. Dragon Age PS3's texture quality was marginally benefitted from the mandatory install possible on the PS3, but at the expense of framerate, which was notably better on 360. And Darksiders 360 is getting patched this week, making the 2 versions (Xbox and PS3) intentical. If you wanted to buy Darksiders on day one, as I did, you got the PS3 version, but the week after it launched, everyone will be having the same experience. With Dragon Age, you have to ask yourself if you preffer better textures or framerate. So it's not as cut and dry as you make it out to be. As everyone here knows the 360 generally has superior multiplatform games graphically... just check out Gamestops Multiplatform comparison screenshots if you doubt this.

I dunno, it wasn't just textures, it was the color and warmth and complexity of features on faces etc.
Avatar image for CODnut
CODnut

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 CODnut
Member since 2008 • 47 Posts

True Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion was alot better on PS3 smoother framerates and slightly better graphics, but again Oblivion came out on PS3 over a year after it came out on 360, so dev's had all that time to touch it it up.

So it all depends what you want to believe i guess, i personally think that there are both pros and cons to both 360 and PS3 hardware, but in the end results in graphics and gameplay are so minor that it doesn't really make a difference which system you have.

It depends on the skill of the developer and the time they invest on each dev kit, but neither 360 or PS3 is the odd man out, if anything the Wii is the only one left behind this gen as far as graphics and gameplay and online services go, and yet it out sells the other 2 so whose to say.

It just comes down to whatever floats your boat ( personal preference ) of gameplay, graphics and game library.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#34 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49576 Posts

I just mention Dragon Age because there had to be a fairly substantial difference to score one higher than the other.Skittles_McGee
There wasn't a substantial difference between the PS3 and X360 versions. I had this discussion before with Kevin-V and he failed to show otherwise.

Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts
[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"]Darksiders and Dragon Age come to mind.donalbane
Those are 2 very different examples, both of which are misleading. Dragon Age PS3's texture quality was marginally benefitted from the mandatory install possible on the PS3, but at the expense of framerate, which was notably better on 360. And Darksiders 360 is getting patched this week, making the 2 versions (Xbox and PS3) intentical. If you wanted to buy Darksiders on day one, as I did, you got the PS3 version, but the week after it launched, everyone will be having the same experience. With Dragon Age, you have to ask yourself if you preffer better textures or framerate. So it's not as cut and dry as you make it out to be. As everyone here knows the 360 generally has superior multiplatform games graphically... just check out Gamestops Multiplatform comparison screenshots if you doubt this.

You really belive that they will fix tearing and framerate that qiuck? They coudn't do this durning the years of game development on EASY TO DEVELOP console :D I highly doubt that this patch will make any diffrence.
Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"]I just mention Dragon Age because there had to be a fairly substantial difference to score one higher than the other.Stevo_the_gamer

There wasn't a substantial difference between the PS3 and X360 versions. I had this discussion before with Kevin-V and he failed to show otherwise.

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=16618
Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#37 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts

True Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion was alot better on PS3 smoother framerates and slightly better graphics, but again Oblivion came out on PS3 over a year after it came out on 360, so dev's had all that time to touch it it up.

So it all depends what you want to believe i guess, i personally think that there are both pros and cons to both 360 and PS3 hardware, but in the end results in graphics and gameplay are so minor that it doesn't really make a difference which system you have.

It depends on the skill of the developer and the time they invest on each dev kit, but neither 360 or PS3 is the odd man out, if anything the Wii is the only one left behind this gen as far as graphics and gameplay and online services go, and yet it out sells the other 2 so whose to say.

It just comes down to whatever floats your boat ( personal preference ) of gameplay, graphics and game library.

CODnut

The graphical features you mention about the PS3 Oblivion (draw distance and dithering improvements) got patched into the 360 (and PC) version the same time the PS3 version launched. The PS3 version did have shorter loads, though... once again the result of a mandatory install. I agree though, these differences are minor generally, and typically the result of developer comfort zones with a given system. Honestly, all things being equal, I choose multiplats based on controller preference and online-emphasis.

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#38 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts

[QUOTE="donalbane"][QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"]Darksiders and Dragon Age come to mind.sayonara89
Those are 2 very different examples, both of which are misleading. Dragon Age PS3's texture quality was marginally benefitted from the mandatory install possible on the PS3, but at the expense of framerate, which was notably better on 360. And Darksiders 360 is getting patched this week, making the 2 versions (Xbox and PS3) intentical. If you wanted to buy Darksiders on day one, as I did, you got the PS3 version, but the week after it launched, everyone will be having the same experience. With Dragon Age, you have to ask yourself if you preffer better textures or framerate. So it's not as cut and dry as you make it out to be. As everyone here knows the 360 generally has superior multiplatform games graphically... just check out Gamestops Multiplatform comparison screenshots if you doubt this.

You really belive that they will fix tearing and framerate that qiuck? They coudn't do this durning the years of game development on EASY TO DEVELOP console :D I highly doubt that this patch will make any diffrence.

Sure do :D

Linkity

Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts
[QUOTE="donalbane"][QUOTE="CODnut"]

True Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion was alot better on PS3 smoother framerates and slightly better graphics, but again Oblivion came out on PS3 over a year after it came out on 360, so dev's had all that time to touch it it up.

So it all depends what you want to believe i guess, i personally think that there are both pros and cons to both 360 and PS3 hardware, but in the end results in graphics and gameplay are so minor that it doesn't really make a difference which system you have.

It depends on the skill of the developer and the time they invest on each dev kit, but neither 360 or PS3 is the odd man out, if anything the Wii is the only one left behind this gen as far as graphics and gameplay and online services go, and yet it out sells the other 2 so whose to say.

It just comes down to whatever floats your boat ( personal preference ) of gameplay, graphics and game library.

The graphical features you mention about the PS3 Oblivion got patched into the 360 (and PC) version the same time the PS3 version launched. The PS3 version did have shorter loads, though... once again the result of a mandatory install. I agree though, these differences are minor generally, and typically the result of developer comfort zones with a given system. Honestly, all things being equal, I choose multiplats based on controller preference and online-emphasis.

GOTY edition of 360 version looks almost the same as retail, still has sub hd resolution and poor anisotropic filtering (compared to 720p on PS3 and good filtering). I heard that PS3 play just from the disc (no install at all).
Avatar image for deathtarget04
deathtarget04

2266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#40 deathtarget04
Member since 2009 • 2266 Posts

Dragon age, has the only noticeable difference.

I dont know about Darksiders. How is that better?

As for Batman, the exclusive Joker content is on PS3, but i heard than it runs smoother on 360.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion.FlamesOfGrey

no just not, the 360 version was pretty much all ways better all the ps3 version had was draw distance which was fix on the 360 version i an update.

edit: yet again people are mistaking the 360 version was all ways superior the load times destroyed ps3 load times and if you installed oblivion it totally killed the ps3 version in load times, frame rate was never worse, and all the ps3 version had over the 360 version was draw distance oh and more bugs.

The ps3 version was vastly more buggy then the 360 or pc versions, and the ps3 version got less then half the content the pc and 360 version got.
so yes oblivion was superior on the 360 specially cause of DLC.

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#43 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
[QUOTE="sayonara89"][QUOTE="donalbane"][QUOTE="CODnut"]

True Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion was alot better on PS3 smoother framerates and slightly better graphics, but again Oblivion came out on PS3 over a year after it came out on 360, so dev's had all that time to touch it it up.

So it all depends what you want to believe i guess, i personally think that there are both pros and cons to both 360 and PS3 hardware, but in the end results in graphics and gameplay are so minor that it doesn't really make a difference which system you have.

It depends on the skill of the developer and the time they invest on each dev kit, but neither 360 or PS3 is the odd man out, if anything the Wii is the only one left behind this gen as far as graphics and gameplay and online services go, and yet it out sells the other 2 so whose to say.

It just comes down to whatever floats your boat ( personal preference ) of gameplay, graphics and game library.

The graphical features you mention about the PS3 Oblivion got patched into the 360 (and PC) version the same time the PS3 version launched. The PS3 version did have shorter loads, though... once again the result of a mandatory install. I agree though, these differences are minor generally, and typically the result of developer comfort zones with a given system. Honestly, all things being equal, I choose multiplats based on controller preference and online-emphasis.

GOTY edition of 360 version looks almost the same as retail, still has sub hd resolution and poor anisotropic filtering (compared to 720p on PS3 and good filtering). I heard that PS3 play just from the disc (no install at all).

Turns out it was an OPTIONAL 4.4Gb Oblivion install. Didn't know about the Halo 3-esque sub 720p resolution. I stand corrected. (Though the 360 version did get a terrific patch that improved dithering and draw distance when the PS3 version launched. I was thrilled.)
Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#44 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
[QUOTE="deathtarget04"]

Dragon age, has the only noticeable difference.

I dont know about Darksiders. How is that better?

As for Batman, the exclusive Joker content is on PS3, but i heard than it runs smoother on 360.

[QUOTE="deathtarget04"]

Dragon age, has the only noticeable difference.

I dont know about Darksiders. How is that better?

As for Batman, the exclusive Joker content is on PS3, but i heard than it runs smoother on 360.

Darksiders on 360 has framerate drops and seam tearing, both of which are getting patched in a matter of days. So for early adopters, the PS3 version is superior. For anybody jumping on the Darksiders wagon later, it should be a toss up.
Avatar image for 2mrw
2mrw

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#45 2mrw
Member since 2008 • 6205 Posts

After what happen to bayonetta i just dont understand why 360 mps are always the better version. :? Do devs even try:question:

Caramel_Fantasy
majority of gamers dun care, coz they aren't PC programmers nor analysts, they just get the game on their system of choice or based on how cool the box art, i was like that till i joined the GS commnuity .......... so it really doesn't matter for many gamers.
Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion.WilliamRLBaker

no just not, the 360 version was pretty much all ways better all the ps3 version had was draw distance which was fix on the 360 version i an update.

edit: yet again people are mistaking the 360 version was all ways superior the load times destroyed ps3 load times and if you installed oblivion it totally killed the ps3 version in load times, frame rate was never worse, and all the ps3 version had over the 360 version was draw distance oh and more bugs.

The ps3 version was vastly more buggy then the 360 or pc versions, and the ps3 version got less then half the content the pc and 360 version got.
so yes oblivion was superior on the 360 specially cause of DLC.

both are as buggy as one another its a pretty buggy game to be brutally honest, the framerate is much more smooth on the PS3 im not joking.But i will say that installation cant be done by all users where as the PS3 is automatically installed from the get go so the arguement is a grey area as not everyone will install it to the HDD or even have a HDD as standard on the 360 so in some senses that arguement falls into a grey area as its not gonna be accesible by ALL users so not everyone is benifiting from this.

Also the DLC from what i remember was a couple of reskinned horses and a tower nothing that really really added to the gameplay to be brutally honest and most likely only bought by an extremely small proportion of the games owners.

Avatar image for Panosola
Panosola

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Panosola
Member since 2006 • 2150 Posts

[QUOTE="deathtarget04"]

Dragon age, has the only noticeable difference.

I dont know about Darksiders. How is that better?

As for Batman, the exclusive Joker content is on PS3, but i heard than it runs smoother on 360.

donalbane

Dragon age, has the only noticeable difference.

I dont know about Darksiders. How is that better?

As for Batman, the exclusive Joker content is on PS3, but i heard than it runs smoother on 360.

deathtarget04

Darksiders on 360 has framerate drops and seam tearing, both of which are getting patched in a matter of days. So for early adopters, the PS3 version is superior. For anybody jumping on the Darksiders wagon later, it should be a toss up.

99% of multiplats games look and play better on the XBOX360.I have buy Darksiders for the 360 and i have install the game and i don't notice any framerate drops and i have less tearing with install.Τhankfully the patch it will come and the game it will play perfect on the XBOX360.I have rent the game on the ps3(just to see the differences) but i notice the game on the 360 it have better colors and bit more sharp and clear graphics.I think again the game is a bit better on the XBOX360.

Avatar image for planbfreak4eva
planbfreak4eva

2856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 planbfreak4eva
Member since 2006 • 2856 Posts

burnout paradise is better on ps3, thats all i know, eh and bioshock aswell

Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts

99% of multiplats games look and play better on the XBOX360.I have buy Darksiders for the 360 and i have install the game and i don't notice any framerate drops and i have less tearing with install.Τhankfully the patch it will come and the game it will play perfect on the XBOX360.I have rent the game on the ps3(just to see the differences) but i notice the game on the 360 it have better colors and bit more sharp and clear graphics.I think again the game is a bit better on the XBOX360.

Panosola

:D

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29826 Posts

After what happen to bayonetta i just dont understand why 360 mps are always the better version. :? Do devs even try:question:

Caramel_Fantasy
dragon age, and batman: AA has bonus content.