And this is what happened to Battlefield 2042.

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

38854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 38854 Posts

This was the last game with an EA logo on the box that i've ever purchased. If i do get DA4/MassEffect5, it will be on consoles, and in used condition so not a cent goes into their pockets. I AM MAD.

Avatar image for Postosuchus
Postosuchus

907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Postosuchus
Member since 2005 • 907 Posts

Second best-selling launch in the series, so everyone who purchased this told EA and DICE “you’re doing the right thing”. I expect upper management will be rewarded with bonuses and will double down on further aping every other popular shooter on the market right now.

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

38854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 38854 Posts

@Postosuchus said:

Second best-selling launch in the series, so everyone who purchased this told EA and DICE “you’re doing the right thing”. I expect upper management will be rewarded with bonuses and will double down on further aping every other popular shooter on the market right now.

And how many of those were refunded? Was the free 10h on gamepass included in the sales? How did those initial sales do for Anthem? And this is a live service game... initial sales are less important than player's engagement for the years to come, and its not with 2042 that they'll succeed at that. On Steam, there is almost more players currently playing BFV than the brand new BF that just came out. Those sales you saw is just an illusion of the game doing well.

Avatar image for mesome713
Mesome713

7201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

#4 Mesome713
Member since 2019 • 7201 Posts

I’m gonna buy it just to rekt the haters.

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

38854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 38854 Posts

@mesome713 said:

I’m gonna buy it just to rekt the haters.

You're stuck with the Switch as your main and only system. You're not fooling anybody😂

Avatar image for fedor
Fedor

11612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Fedor
Member since 2015 • 11612 Posts

Nobody should have even bought it after the beta was a disaster.

Avatar image for dagubot
Dagubot

421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7 Dagubot
Member since 2020 • 421 Posts

You're an angry little guy on System Wars eh?

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

38854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 38854 Posts

@dagubot said:

You're an angry little guy on System Wars eh?

Angry and butthurt, all at the same time. Not a combination you want to see yourself in.

Avatar image for dagubot
Dagubot

421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9 Dagubot
Member since 2020 • 421 Posts

@hardwenzen said:
@dagubot said:

You're an angry little guy on System Wars eh?

Angry and butthurt, all at the same time. Not a combination you want to see yourself in.

😂😂😂

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20104 Posts

I believe all of this based on how the game is right now. We could have had Bad Company 3... WTH is wrong with EA? They knew enough about how popular it is to put BC2 in Portal but dumb enough to think we wouldn't want a third?

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

38854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 38854 Posts

@Zero_epyon said:

I believe all of this based on how the game is right now. We could have had Bad Company 3... WTH is wrong with EA? They knew enough about how popular it is to put BC2 in Portal but dumb enough to think we wouldn't want a third?

With every coming year, these big publishers/devs are more n more disconnected from gamers. Its ******* disgusting to think that we could've had BC3 YEARS AGO. Imagine BC3 with BF4 customization (or better... cuz you know, games are supposed to improve from their past titles, not copy them) with next gen levolution, etc. How cool would it be if you were able to destroy all the skyscrapers by placing like 50 c4's at the bottom? Its so annoying to think that none of this was done, at no chance of happening in the future.

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20104 Posts

@hardwenzen said:
@Zero_epyon said:

I believe all of this based on how the game is right now. We could have had Bad Company 3... WTH is wrong with EA? They knew enough about how popular it is to put BC2 in Portal but dumb enough to think we wouldn't want a third?

With every coming year, these big publishers/devs are more n more disconnected from gamers. Its ******* disgusting to think that we could've had BC3 YEARS AGO. Imagine BC3 with BF4 customization (or better... cuz you know, games are supposed to improve from their past titles, not copy them) with next gen levolution, etc. How cool would it be if you were able to destroy all the skyscrapers by placing like 50 c4's at the bottom? Its so annoying to think that none of this was done, at no chance of happening in the future.

Arica Harbor in 2042 sucks compared to BC2. The destruction, the sound quality, the gun play. It was peak DICE and should have only improved from there.

Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#13 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11511 Posts

RIP Dice, and Battlefield. another beloved studio and franchise destroyed by an awful publisher.

boggles the mind how EA make such awful decisions, and the resulting games still do well enough to support them. and I am 100% part of the problem in this case since I bought the game.

****

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

38854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 38854 Posts

@Zero_epyon said:
@hardwenzen said:
@Zero_epyon said:

I believe all of this based on how the game is right now. We could have had Bad Company 3... WTH is wrong with EA? They knew enough about how popular it is to put BC2 in Portal but dumb enough to think we wouldn't want a third?

With every coming year, these big publishers/devs are more n more disconnected from gamers. Its ******* disgusting to think that we could've had BC3 YEARS AGO. Imagine BC3 with BF4 customization (or better... cuz you know, games are supposed to improve from their past titles, not copy them) with next gen levolution, etc. How cool would it be if you were able to destroy all the skyscrapers by placing like 50 c4's at the bottom? Its so annoying to think that none of this was done, at no chance of happening in the future.

Arica Harbor in 2042 sucks compared to BC2. The destruction, the sound quality, the gun play. It was peak DICE and should have only improved from there.

lol i've noticed. The very first thing i did when i installed the game is load Arica with mah AN-94 to see what's up. Completely ruined, all of it. The different feel, the sound and shitty bloom has also destroyed my AN-94. Really disappointing, but why would it be good when the rest of the game is shit?

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

17808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 225

User Lists: 0

#15 BassMan
Member since 2002 • 17808 Posts

R.I.P. DICE and BF

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61481 Posts

Glad I only upped my EA Play Pro for a month. If they manage to turn it around without the nonsense, I may pick it up again in a year or so.

Avatar image for pyro1245
pyro1245

9397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#17 pyro1245
Member since 2003 • 9397 Posts

Working as intended......

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#18 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26098 Posts

Reads like fan-fiction, but it is a narrative that has been shared for a while these past few years.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

58305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 58305 Posts

I was so dissatisfied with the 10-hour trial I don't think I even used four hours of it.

Also "hero shooter" lol, called it. They're just aping other games.

As I said in another thread, I don't play Battlefield because it's like APEX or COD, I play it because it's not like those games. Or rather, it used to not be like them; now it is.

All I want is a realism-lite military themed shooter that focuses on squad-based gameplay. No gimmicks. No "heroes" with special abilities. Just classes that complement each other battling it out on giant maps with 150 people on foot and in vehicles.

Honestly these publishers need a lesson in "less is more".