1) the Wii is a fairly horrible console to own by itself, inferior graphics and physics, and outside the SMG games, not too much quality either.
2) the 360s failure rates, up until like 2009, marred it irrevocably - many people who bought them regretted it as they felt like they bought some sort of ticking bomb doomed to explode on release of the next big exclusive.
3) the 360s live fee, if you owned one since 2005, great, you spent the value of a second console atleast on online fees, what a joke.
4) the 360 seems to have gone into game decline eariler than the ps3, to be fair it launched earlier, but I'm more inclined to blame Kinect...but that's ok cause gamers wants Kinect games right? RIGHT?
5) the ps3 exclusives kick ass, there's a lot of them, and a lot are newer than the 360s - standards improved, they're better games. we all know it, and if not, just go to metacritic.
6) the PC is king... it always is, deal with it. The consoles can't compete with games like Starcraft 2, Football Manager, Amnesia, TF2, WoW, Shogun:TW, and soon BF3. So you have to have a PC, ok established. So what should I partner my PC with?...the best option of course, the PS3, what a silly question. Is this hiding behind the PC? lemmings always say it is, I say it's common sense.
IMO the above trumps the SW meta-game, which get's used as a smoke-screen.
Log in to comment