Why does Nintendo and Microsoft gets the crappy Final Fantasy games?

Avatar image for Soulja_West
Soulja_West

15084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Soulja_West
Member since 2003 • 15084 Posts
Well not crappy but the FF games that are on Nintendo isn't as good as the FF games that Sony has. Whats the reason behind this? All Microsoft gets is FFXI which is very old. Will Nintendo and Microsoft ever get any good FF games? If so, when? I don't see it happening unless the FF games stop selling on the PS3 because of its price. Thats the only how it may happen.
Avatar image for -Pro-Link-
-Pro-Link-

6297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 -Pro-Link-
Member since 2006 • 6297 Posts
I hope not.  If they do have them on other consoles then Sony will be losing a lot of business.  But you never know.  It just wouldn't feel right playing FinalFantasy VII on the N64. :P
Avatar image for taiwanesealn
taiwanesealn

6853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 taiwanesealn
Member since 2005 • 6853 Posts
Sony probably made a deal to give a percent of their sales to Square, that's what I think :roll: :P
Avatar image for VGMusicFreak
VGMusicFreak

1760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 VGMusicFreak
Member since 2003 • 1760 Posts
well id say crystal chronicles was crappy game they got but FF3 for DS looks great as well as children of mana.  Im not sure there is a reason other then money as NGC was more powerful this gen then ps2.
Avatar image for ccgod
ccgod

7915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 ccgod
Member since 2003 • 7915 Posts
[QUOTE="-Pro-Link-"]I hope not. If they do have them on other consoles then Sony will be losing a lot of business. But you never know. It just wouldn't feel right playing FinalFantasy VII on the N64. :P



The chip can't hold CGI
Avatar image for ccgod
ccgod

7915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 ccgod
Member since 2003 • 7915 Posts
The reason they're better is because they have more/better quality devs working on the titles also Sony owns a lot of shares of Square
Avatar image for Ultimaga77
Ultimaga77

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Ultimaga77
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

i think that if SE loses enough money they might switch to Wii or 360.

heck, with the overpriced PS3 and FFXIII (which IMHO is a shovelware gimmick right off the bat) losing money might not be too hard.

maybe if we're lucky then SE will start making good FFs on the Wii...

well i can dream can't I?

Avatar image for Soldier_Shadow
Soldier_Shadow

865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#8 Soldier_Shadow
Member since 2005 • 865 Posts
its true that sony owns more shares of square than nintendo and microsoft. nintendo used to have square but when square went their own way and made FFVII for the PS1, nintendo sold their shares because square was at an all time high with the release. microsoft bought some of square so they only got FFXI (which shouldnt be a part of the numbered series). nintendo at least got FF3 and FF Crystal Chronicles for the recent systems.
Avatar image for gamerrgurrl9
gamerrgurrl9

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 gamerrgurrl9
Member since 2005 • 1982 Posts
It all comes down to money so Sony must've made a great deal with Square.
Avatar image for snaggleoooo
snaggleoooo

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#10 snaggleoooo
Member since 2006 • 1059 Posts
Nintendo haven't done that badly, the GBA and DS FF's are great. They are both inferior systems, so they don't deserve to get FFs.