Women's March PR disaster

A couple days ago there was a very long and popular article on Tablet. It basically illustrates how the Women's March had problems from the very beginning, and how it only benefits a few women. Everything from the antisemitism of Tamika Mallory and Linda Sarsour, the trademarking of the Women's March, the financing of a 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(3) both using the name "Woman's March" is discussed. There is a lot of information and it's a good read.

There are a lot of journalists who agree. A ton of journalist who shared the story got an E-mail from a PR company called "Megaphone Strategies" saying the Tablet article was bogus.

So they would get the "real" scoop from this PR company, so long as they deleted any links to the Tablet article, and the info they got was off-the-record. So they would have to denounce the Tablet article in order to get so called "verified" information they couldn't report on.

You can see many other journalist got the same email in Miriam's thread. No one is falling for it As far as we know, Megaphone Strategies works on behalf of the Women's March

@vl4d_l3nin: Real Women's March is to remove ALL religion(ideology) restrictions on women e.g. target ALL gulf states

When Ben and Jerry’s decided to alienate half of their consumer base by virtue signaling with their “Resist” ice cream, I couldn’t help but laugh when they made that photo op with Sarsour. The founders of the company are Jewish and Sarsour is probably not the biggest champion of Jewish rights.

Not to mention the ties founders of the Women’s March has to Louis Farrakhan. Even activist celebrity and frequent Trump basher Alyssa Milano broke ranks with the Women’s March because of the alleged bigotry of the founders.

@vl4d_l3nin

appears you and that author missed the point of the march

@tryit: And that was?

so...

that is all I can think of when i read this story.

so...?

if the outcome is good, who cares if the people who started it did it for personal profit reasons? you completely against anything whatsoever similar to market economy?

one does not need to know what something is in order to know what it is not