Why did Liberals riot after Trump won, and will they riot again if he's re-elected?

No actually your argument was stupid because it had no context. You don't know. But you tried to pretend you did. FYI look up what the term devil's advocate means. It will do you some good.

@r-gamer: He's the guy who denied the liberal riots happened after Trump won. He was trying to argue it was actually right wingers rioting in Portland and Oakland. Lol.

Not what I said. Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing. Try it.

@LJS9502_basic: I know exactly what Devils advocate means. Regardless you made a stupid far left observation as usual.

If they say hate crime vs white people has risen it would mean they crime was committed because they were white. It didn't say hate crimes vs liberals had risen. Stop being a dumb ass.

The Charlottesville rally organized by this guy? https://forward.com/fast-forward/380476/charlottesville-neo-nazi-jason-kessler-jewish-girlfriend/ Which was organized in advanced when another group of left wingers decided to go up and "counter protests" (pick fights)? Or are we talking about something else? You're going to need a better example than that.

@eoten: Thanks for the link, I wasn't aware of those details regarding the Charlottesville incident. That's an eye opener.

And when you realize that event is all the left has and uses to justify acts of violence against people on the right, the picture becomes even clearer too.

Wait, so was it a lefty who ran someone over?Where those White Supremacists marching with tki-torches stating "Jews will not replace us" lefties?

I'm confused.

He may have been a liberal a long time ago, but Kessler is right winger who belongs to right wing group, as was "Unit the Right". The false flag conspiracy theory has been debunked, https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/07/24/unraveling-unite-right-conspiracy-theories

Unraveling 'Unite the Right' conspiracy theories

Uhh...

All of the extremist killings in the US in 2018 had links to right-wing extremism, according to new report

https://www.businessinsider.com/extremist-killings-links-right-wing-extremism-report-2019-1

@eoten: that's some Olympic level victim blaming.

How fucking shameful you should feel to the murdered victim

Again with the ADL report.....

ADL is not what we call an unbiased org.

FBI director to Congress: Most domestic terror cases are driven by "white supremacist violence"

https://www.salon.com/2019/07/24/fbi-director-to-congress-most-domestic-terror-cases-are-driven-by-white-supremacist-violence/

GAO Weighs In On “Countering Violent Extremism”

https://www.cato.org/blog/gao-weighs-countering-violent-extremism

P.S. ADL is reliable, high factual reporting.

Absolute nonsense that ADL is reliable.

Also "most" is not all.

ADL was talking deaths. FBI was just saying any domestic terror case. GAO is also correct.

Either way, Eoten is proven wrong and I'm glad you aren't contesting that much.

Believing I am wrong is not the same as proving it. You still get your feelings confused with reality.

I literally just cited the FBI, GAO, and ADL............

It's okay to be wrong man.

ADL was talking deaths as their opinion dictates are considered deaths.

FBI is taking the data which conforms to their org. rules.

Either way, ADL is biased as f... it´s like asking PETA if meat is murder and expecting a truthful answer.

What.

Huh?

Are you gonna refute my citation yet or not? Eoten was wrong. Deal with it?

I came to discuss the original topic, but this thread seems to have fallen off the rails a while back.

I am refuting your assertion that ADL is not biased.

I never said they are not biased. I'm using the data from my sources that show Eoteon was objectively wrong.

You agree Eoten was incorrect based off of the FBI, GAO, ADL, and SPLC right? I mean he said Charlotesville was the only event for christ sake...

@LJS9502_basic: @LJS9502_basic: "Not what I said. Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing. Try it"

Liar. You literally said there weren't any riots after Trump won on some other thread, and then you tried to imply it may not have been liberals rioting on the very first comment of this thread. I guess you can't comprehend your own words. That's weird.

Rioters are usually very very dumb or just very very angry. I don't understand rioters fixation with fire, burning other people properties to protest against the government or whatever they are protesting against. They don't have any decency or care.

There were protests. Some bad actors don't change that. Hell they riot after their team wins a championship. Not all. Just some asshats.

@LJS9502_basic: The "protests" became riots once the liberal hooligans began chucking bricks and lighting stuff on fire, stop downplaying the violence. And you still haven't answered the question of "do you think liberals will stage riots again if Trump wins again?" That's literally the talking point of the thread that you've danced around.

I didn't dance around anything and it's not my fault you don't understand.

@LJS9502_basic: So you're not going to answer the topic and you're going to keep dancing around the question? Gotcha.

No.

Liberals from my view are becoming increasingly violent. I am not saying far right groups are not violent, but when you say shit like well far left groups are not near as bad as far right groups you are down playing that both groups are equally terrible. We don't need any far-left/far-right extremist in America today. Both groups are violent and it needs to stop PERIOD.

This election year is going to be such a CF!

Anyway, back to my original point; everybody riots for generally dumb reasons. Let he without riot cast the first stone or something something I don't know.

It doesn't really matter who "did it first" because everyone is to blame.

Yeah I'm really hoping the media is responsible on both sides this rear. Hopefully a bit more objectivity, a bit less bias, and a lot less fear mongering.

We already have major outlets in a dick-measuring contest of "Who can kill more: flu or coronavirus?" let's just pour some incredibly partisan politics on top of that :D

If Trump does indeed stay around for another four years, I expect plentyof YouTube compilation meltdowns. And should the protests begin in my neck of the woods, that's just time and a half for me. Trump creating even more economic progress for me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Yes, I agree with all but ADL

@Stevo_the_gamer: Right on. I can respect that.

Get that money lol

Seriously tho, Antifa has provided so much youtube content. Its like its own genre, Its entertaining for sure. Some of the videos of people interviewing them are hilarious. Violence and breaking stuff is wack tho, doesn't solve anything. People cant say the left doesnt get violent, just gotta type

"antifa compilations" and you will get a flood of content. The media defended Antifa way to long, they cant lie about this stuff, the internet sees all. Everyone has a phone and the internet.

@Guy_Brohski: Hey, don't revenge thread me.

https://www.gamespot.com/forums/political-gamers-909409192/if-trump-loses-his-presidency-this-year-do-you-thi-33482021/

Leftists already cause violence without an election, they go to trumps rallys and assault the people coming in and out.

My side is better than your side. Waa waaaa waaaa.

@warmblur: How is it even a revenge thread? First of all, I don't do revenge threads. And second, they're very different topics. Your thread speculates if right wingers will possibly retaliate with violence if Trump doesn't win a second term. Why would you assume they might? Did they incite violence when Obama won two terms? No. My thread is asking if there will be a repeat of violence from the left if Trump wins again. I can see some similarity in the Topics, but calling it a Revenge Thread is a little dramatic..

This is literally a revenge thread by every definition.

https://www.gamespot.com/forums/political-gamers-909409192/why-did-liberals-riot-after-trump-won-and-will-the-33482987/

https://www.gamespot.com/forums/political-gamers-909409192/why-did-liberals-riot-after-trump-won-and-will-the-33482987/

@zaryia: Why did you post 2 of the exact same links to my thread?

They look near identical so I accidentally copied the wrong URL. My bad Bro.

This is a huge issue in American today and the left is getting more and more violent.

Well, liberals are not the sharpest tools in the shed so...

@Xabiss: I agree. The left is barbaric. I hope the Police in major cities have plenty of riot gear on the ready in case 45 wins again. Because you know for DAMN sure the libs gonna go ape sh** and start riots again.

And yet Trump and MAGA are the ones threatening with civil war if he's not re-elected.

Really? I have not seen anything of the sort. I do know the left will go nucking futs if he wins again.

I don’t know if it wasn’t mentioned earlier, but I think asking if people will riot if Trump wins reelection is looking a little too far ahead. I’d be more concerned about whether or not people will riot if the DNC screws Bernie out of the nomination.

Perhaps the left care more for democratic values, so much so, they're willing to riot....

I mean, the American patriots rioted and rebelled....

Just sayin'...... Maybe conservatives and Trumpettes aren't really patriotic enough to stand up against their government whenever necessary....

;)

Oh they definitely don't stand up to their government when necessary...…..

So, you guys went from saying rioting after Trump won was fake news to saying there was rioting but it’s justified because Trump winning the election was as bad as British oppression that eventually led to the Revolutionary War.

Remind me again, how much violence was there during the recent protests in Virginia against Governor Blackface’s proposals to disarm lawful gun owners versus the violence after the 2016 election, as well as the Antifa attacks?