Sony has taken a dump on it's RPG fans this generation.

  • 62 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for UnrealSin_X
UnrealSin_X

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 UnrealSin_X
Member since 2008 • 925 Posts
Where in the world are the RPG's?
The PS2 was amazing because of the RPG's it had and everyone thought the PS3 would be the same, but it has no RPG's.

FF and FF VS. are a year away with absolutely no information on it in the past few months,WKC has had no news worth mentioning either, then what the hell is left?

I don't understand why SO was announced on the 360 Exclusively, it makes no sense at all. What the hell is going on?
Avatar image for donnygorgas
donnygorgas

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 donnygorgas
Member since 2005 • 2531 Posts
Why is it always Sony's fault?
Avatar image for UnrealSin_X
UnrealSin_X

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 UnrealSin_X
Member since 2008 • 925 Posts
Why is it always Sony's fault? donnygorgas

They are not taking the steps needed to secure RPG's on their console from third party devs, and i don't get why the hell not. It made the PS2 a successful beast.
Avatar image for MusashiSensi
MusashiSensi

9584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#4 MusashiSensi
Member since 2004 • 9584 Posts

Why is it always Sony's fault? donnygorgas

Exactly. I just finished saying the exact same thing in ANOTHER THREAD JUST LIKE THIS. The funny thing is in an earlier topic someone claimed to be a big rpg fan and yet stated that ff7 came out on ps2.....WOW! Anyways, let it be with the rpg's and stop placing the blame on sony...rather stop placing the blame on anyone and just let the games come as they come. This is how the gaming world works ladies & gentlemen, so suck it up and game.

Avatar image for FF6fan
FF6fan

1637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 FF6fan
Member since 2007 • 1637 Posts
Umm how is it sony's fault for developers ,that they can't control, not make RPGs? Squareenix wants to spread the rpg love around. I mean the Wii has Crystal chronicles, PS3 has Final fantasy main series, and 360 now has SO. IDK what your problem is if you look at last gen., FFX didn't get released until a full year after the PS2 was released. Now its a lot harder to make high quality games(by today's standards), which means a longer wait.
Avatar image for CasinoOutlaw247
CasinoOutlaw247

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#6 CasinoOutlaw247
Member since 2005 • 786 Posts
I think the Rolling Stones said it best: you can't always get what you want. Final Fantasy XIII will be worth the wait. Until the RPG floodgates open I'll just have to console myself with Grand Theft Auto IV and Metal Gear Solid 4.
Avatar image for warbmxjohn
warbmxjohn

6014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 warbmxjohn
Member since 2007 • 6014 Posts

[QUOTE="donnygorgas"]Why is it always Sony's fault? MusashiSensi

Exactly. I just finished saying the exact same thing in ANOTHER THREAD JUST LIKE THIS. The funny thing is in an earlier topic someone claimed to be a big rpg fan and yet stated that ff7 came out on ps2.....WOW! Anyways, let it be with the rpg's and stop placing the blame on sony...rather stop placing the blame on anyone and just let the games come as they come. This is how the gaming world works ladies & gentlemen, so suck it up and game.

FF7 on PS2, they shouldn't even call themselves a gaming fan much less an RPG fan:lol: WOW indeed...

Avatar image for iloverock4ever
iloverock4ever

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 iloverock4ever
Member since 2004 • 241 Posts
im a bit starved for an rpg rite about now i actually bought enchanted arms i know its sad
Avatar image for MusashiSensi
MusashiSensi

9584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#9 MusashiSensi
Member since 2004 • 9584 Posts
[QUOTE="MusashiSensi"]

[QUOTE="donnygorgas"]Why is it always Sony's fault? warbmxjohn

Exactly. I just finished saying the exact same thing in ANOTHER THREAD JUST LIKE THIS. The funny thing is in an earlier topic someone claimed to be a big rpg fan and yet stated that ff7 came out on ps2.....WOW! Anyways, let it be with the rpg's and stop placing the blame on sony...rather stop placing the blame on anyone and just let the games come as they come. This is how the gaming world works ladies & gentlemen, so suck it up and game.

FF7 on PS2, they shouldn't even call themselves a gaming fan much less an RPG fan:lol: WOW indeed...

Lol.

Avatar image for ForlonHope
ForlonHope

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#10 ForlonHope
Member since 2006 • 1653 Posts
[QUOTE="warbmxjohn"][QUOTE="MusashiSensi"]

[QUOTE="donnygorgas"]Why is it always Sony's fault? MusashiSensi

Exactly. I just finished saying the exact same thing in ANOTHER THREAD JUST LIKE THIS. The funny thing is in an earlier topic someone claimed to be a big rpg fan and yet stated that ff7 came out on ps2.....WOW! Anyways, let it be with the rpg's and stop placing the blame on sony...rather stop placing the blame on anyone and just let the games come as they come. This is how the gaming world works ladies & gentlemen, so suck it up and game.

FF7 on PS2, they shouldn't even call themselves a gaming fan much less an RPG fan:lol: WOW indeed...

Lol.

Lol. 2nded Dont worry bout SO going to 360. I just watched the trailer, the voice acting is soooo horrible. And im wondering how many people on the xbox 360 marketplace are gonna start thinking its another Mass Effect :-P
Avatar image for gamer_marrik
gamer_marrik

1705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 gamer_marrik
Member since 2007 • 1705 Posts
Looks like you might just have to get another hobby... and enjoy the other amazing games we are in the midst of.
Avatar image for Zidaneski
Zidaneski

9266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Zidaneski
Member since 2003 • 9266 Posts
I guess I'll change my mind and buy Disgaea 3 since no other RPGs are coming out soon. Its a pretty good consolation prize.
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
The reason it's Sony's fault is because they are overconfident from the the last 2 generations and don't think they need to buy exclusives anymore. Wake up Sony or you will be a wasteland.
Avatar image for rogerjak
rogerjak

14950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 rogerjak
Member since 2004 • 14950 Posts
[QUOTE="MusashiSensi"]

[QUOTE="donnygorgas"]Why is it always Sony's fault? warbmxjohn

Exactly. I just finished saying the exact same thing in ANOTHER THREAD JUST LIKE THIS. The funny thing is in an earlier topic someone claimed to be a big rpg fan and yet stated that ff7 came out on ps2.....WOW! Anyways, let it be with the rpg's and stop placing the blame on sony...rather stop placing the blame on anyone and just let the games come as they come. This is how the gaming world works ladies & gentlemen, so suck it up and game.

FF7 on PS2, they shouldn't even call themselves a gaming fan much less an RPG fan:lol: WOW indeed...

Even I that don't like RPGs know that FF7 is in SNES...:P joking PS1.

it's not Sony's fault there are no RPGs. Besides, what do you prefer? half finished RPGs or great ones?

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
I think the Rolling Stones said it best: you can't always get what you want. Final Fantasy XIII will be worth the wait. Until the RPG floodgates open I'll just have to console myself with Grand Theft Auto IV and Metal Gear Solid 4.CasinoOutlaw247

But with only FFXIII it can't be the king of JRPGs this gen.

The PS2 was not the King of JRPGs last gen because of FFX and FFXII but because it had 4 AAA and 30 AA and countless A JRPGs

The Gamecube had 1 AAA JRPG last gen and you think a JRPG fan would have been satisfied with that compared the the PS2?
Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#16 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25931 Posts

FF13 is being shown at E3 and there's talk of a demo:

http://talkplaystation.com/final-fantasy-13-demo-and-e3-confirmed/

Avatar image for Zidaneski
Zidaneski

9266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Zidaneski
Member since 2003 • 9266 Posts
^^^WHOOOHOOO!! Thats right! Never underestimate the power of Final Fantasy! Can't wait for next month.
Avatar image for sa10kun
sa10kun

4290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 sa10kun
Member since 2007 • 4290 Posts
You could always try folklore. Some targets have it for 30 buck I hear. No one really deserves the blame. If you want to blame someone blame ms for buying exclusivity for everything.
Avatar image for ForlonHope
ForlonHope

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#19 ForlonHope
Member since 2006 • 1653 Posts
^^^WHOOOHOOO!! Thats right! Never underestimate the power of Final Fantasy! Can't wait for next month.Zidaneski
To answer your question on the Star Ocean locked thread, IMO SO3 wasn't that great because I played Star Ocean and Star Ocean 2. In SO3, it was almost the same exact plot twist from the first two, which kind of ruined the story for me. The battle system was great, good graphics, voice acting was good, but halfway, the story was just like....mehhh. The originality factor that the original two had completely lost it in the third.
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
You could always try folklore. Some targets have it for 30 buck I hear. No one really deserves the blame. If you want to blame someone blame ms for buying exclusivity for everything.sa10kun

No, blame Sony for not buying exclusives for anything.
Avatar image for Zidaneski
Zidaneski

9266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Zidaneski
Member since 2003 • 9266 Posts

[QUOTE="Zidaneski"]^^^WHOOOHOOO!! Thats right! Never underestimate the power of Final Fantasy! Can't wait for next month.ForlonHope
To answer your question on the Star Ocean locked thread, IMO SO3 wasn't that great because I played Star Ocean and Star Ocean 2. In SO3, it was almost the same exact plot twist from the first two, which kind of ruined the story for me. The battle system was great, good graphics, voice acting was good, but halfway, the story was just like....mehhh. The originality factor that the original two had completely lost it in the third.

Were the games continuous or did they have seperate storylines?

Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#22 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts

Knowned franchises turned exclusives or multiplatforms, yet we are still receiving new IPs. Check the Japanese store for more RPGs info, there are a ton that will be releasing starting July. The last trailer from a new one is from Tears to Tiara (an SJRPG). We also have Valkyrie of the Battlefield (recently changed to Chronicles) which is an action SJRPG, White Knight Story from Level 5 (great developer), Disgaea 3 from Nipon Ichi, Persona 4 will work on the PS3 with BC (and if the rumor is true, then 40 owners will also be able to play it), there is a secret MMORPG by SE thats exclusive to the PS3, there is FF XIII and vs XIII and some others JRPGs, but their names are in Japanese so I cant read their names, but they also have demos in the japanese store and a really cool theme of Valkyrie Chronicles. Also, remember that Tales of the Abyss sold less than 500k units in a PS2 with a userbase of over 100 millions and that Star Ocean 3 sold only 1.3 million units. I love those games, and I really want to play them, but you can see that they dont represent much in terms of sales.

SE wanted to give support to all consoles in a somewhat equalitative way. Final Fantasy XII is the worst selling Final Fantasy since VII was released with only 5 million+ units sold. Star Ocean plus Tales (I know its from Namco) dont even approach that number. But Star Ocean 4 is not completely exclusive so we might as well wait till E3 or TGS 08 for further news, besides, we would be getting their DC editions which in the case of SO 3 was much better than the regular one.

Avatar image for Masterbeat2
Masterbeat2

766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Masterbeat2
Member since 2007 • 766 Posts
let us just wait for RPG's.. eventhough some of the RPG's are done making.. it will take a long time for them for release it.. for suspense I guess? :o
Avatar image for sa10kun
sa10kun

4290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 sa10kun
Member since 2007 • 4290 Posts

[QUOTE="sa10kun"]You could always try folklore. Some targets have it for 30 buck I hear. No one really deserves the blame. If you want to blame someone blame ms for buying exclusivity for everything.JLF1

No, blame Sony for not buying exclusives for anything.

No, blame ms. Haha did that make you feel any better?

Avatar image for ForlonHope
ForlonHope

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#25 ForlonHope
Member since 2006 • 1653 Posts

[QUOTE="ForlonHope"][QUOTE="Zidaneski"]^^^WHOOOHOOO!! Thats right! Never underestimate the power of Final Fantasy! Can't wait for next month.Zidaneski

To answer your question on the Star Ocean locked thread, IMO SO3 wasn't that great because I played Star Ocean and Star Ocean 2. In SO3, it was almost the same exact plot twist from the first two, which kind of ruined the story for me. The battle system was great, good graphics, voice acting was good, but halfway, the story was just like....mehhh. The originality factor that the original two had completely lost it in the third.

Were the games continuous or did they have seperate storylines?

They all were completely different stories (with the exception of Blue Sphere on GBA which was a little side story/continuation of SO2). SO1 and SO2 kind of had a link but it was very slight. SO2 was a completely different story. SO3 had some cameos of SO1 and SO2 (like few items had references back to the old games), nothing major. SO3 was just really predictable if you played SO1 and SO2 in the form of story structure which kind of made me unhappy to play it when i got to the middle of Disc 2. Play Star Ocean 1 and 2. They are great games, play SO3, you will see.
Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#26 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts
[QUOTE="Zidaneski"]

[QUOTE="ForlonHope"][QUOTE="Zidaneski"]^^^WHOOOHOOO!! Thats right! Never underestimate the power of Final Fantasy! Can't wait for next month.ForlonHope

To answer your question on the Star Ocean locked thread, IMO SO3 wasn't that great because I played Star Ocean and Star Ocean 2. In SO3, it was almost the same exact plot twist from the first two, which kind of ruined the story for me. The battle system was great, good graphics, voice acting was good, but halfway, the story was just like....mehhh. The originality factor that the original two had completely lost it in the third.

Were the games continuous or did they have seperate storylines?

They all were completely different stories (with the exception of Blue Sphere on GBA which was a little side story/continuation of SO2). SO1 and SO2 kind of had a link but it was very slight. SO2 was a completely different story. SO3 had some cameos of SO1 and SO2 (like few items had references back to the old games), nothing major. SO3 was just really predictable if you played SO1 and SO2 in the form of story structure which kind of made me unhappy to play it when i got to the middle of Disc 2. Play Star Ocean 1 and 2. They are great games, play SO3, you will see.

The 3 had a link, in terms of locations, terms objects and such, but they are unique stories too. I never got to play SO 1 or 2 (hoping they would bring them states side for the PSP :( But SO 3 was a really good game back in the day.

Avatar image for Prinze
Prinze

4492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 Prinze
Member since 2003 • 4492 Posts

[QUOTE="sa10kun"]You could always try folklore. Some targets have it for 30 buck I hear. No one really deserves the blame. If you want to blame someone blame ms for buying exclusivity for everything.JLF1

No, blame Sony for not buying exclusives for anything.

That's so naive, you blame a company based on their principles.

Avatar image for ForlonHope
ForlonHope

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#28 ForlonHope
Member since 2006 • 1653 Posts
[QUOTE="ForlonHope"][QUOTE="Zidaneski"]

[QUOTE="ForlonHope"][QUOTE="Zidaneski"]^^^WHOOOHOOO!! Thats right! Never underestimate the power of Final Fantasy! Can't wait for next month.kenshinhimura16

To answer your question on the Star Ocean locked thread, IMO SO3 wasn't that great because I played Star Ocean and Star Ocean 2. In SO3, it was almost the same exact plot twist from the first two, which kind of ruined the story for me. The battle system was great, good graphics, voice acting was good, but halfway, the story was just like....mehhh. The originality factor that the original two had completely lost it in the third.

Were the games continuous or did they have seperate storylines?

They all were completely different stories (with the exception of Blue Sphere on GBA which was a little side story/continuation of SO2). SO1 and SO2 kind of had a link but it was very slight. SO2 was a completely different story. SO3 had some cameos of SO1 and SO2 (like few items had references back to the old games), nothing major. SO3 was just really predictable if you played SO1 and SO2 in the form of story structure which kind of made me unhappy to play it when i got to the middle of Disc 2. Play Star Ocean 1 and 2. They are great games, play SO3, you will see.

The 3 had a link, in terms of locations, terms objects and such, but they are unique stories too. I never got to play SO 1 or 2 (hoping they would bring them states side for the PSP :( But SO 3 was a really good game back in the day.

berries and some items of course were the same lol XD as far as location, SO3 was in a completely different world. SO1 and SO2 only shared one location but their was a time lapse difference, very insignificant to the story. Can u say SO1 and SO2 coming to PSP...for Japan only? (T__T)
Avatar image for Zidaneski
Zidaneski

9266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Zidaneski
Member since 2003 • 9266 Posts
[QUOTE="Zidaneski"]

[QUOTE="ForlonHope"][QUOTE="Zidaneski"]^^^WHOOOHOOO!! Thats right! Never underestimate the power of Final Fantasy! Can't wait for next month.ForlonHope

To answer your question on the Star Ocean locked thread, IMO SO3 wasn't that great because I played Star Ocean and Star Ocean 2. In SO3, it was almost the same exact plot twist from the first two, which kind of ruined the story for me. The battle system was great, good graphics, voice acting was good, but halfway, the story was just like....mehhh. The originality factor that the original two had completely lost it in the third.

Were the games continuous or did they have seperate storylines?

They all were completely different stories (with the exception of Blue Sphere on GBA which was a little side story/continuation of SO2). SO1 and SO2 kind of had a link but it was very slight. SO2 was a completely different story. SO3 had some cameos of SO1 and SO2 (like few items had references back to the old games), nothing major. SO3 was just really predictable if you played SO1 and SO2 in the form of story structure which kind of made me unhappy to play it when i got to the middle of Disc 2. Play Star Ocean 1 and 2. They are great games, play SO3, you will see.

The battles I thought were pretty good but I couldn't stand the cutscenes. I guess its because I had gotten use to FF, Kingdom Hearts, Dark Cloud 1 and 2, Rogue Galaxy, Valkyrie Profile 2, and the Jak series so much that SO3 felt like a step backwards in terms of story progression. If they can fix that in SO4 then I will by all means play it since they aren't continous either.

Avatar image for WR_Platinum
WR_Platinum

4685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 WR_Platinum
Member since 2003 • 4685 Posts

Wow.... another "Sony's not bringing no RPGS just like the PS2 did that made it successful omg I'm about to cry" thread....

Patience is a virtue people...

Avatar image for jyoung312
jyoung312

4971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 jyoung312
Member since 2003 • 4971 Posts
It was a MS RPG event so of course they are gonna show 360 exclusives. Star Ocean is probably a timed exclusive like Last Remnant but this titles are not as big as FFI3 or FFversus. Expect to hear more about those games and ps3 exclusive rpgs at E3 or the summer square event.
Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#32 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts
[QUOTE="kenshinhimura16"][QUOTE="ForlonHope"][QUOTE="Zidaneski"]

[QUOTE="ForlonHope"][QUOTE="Zidaneski"]^^^WHOOOHOOO!! Thats right! Never underestimate the power of Final Fantasy! Can't wait for next month.ForlonHope

To answer your question on the Star Ocean locked thread, IMO SO3 wasn't that great because I played Star Ocean and Star Ocean 2. In SO3, it was almost the same exact plot twist from the first two, which kind of ruined the story for me. The battle system was great, good graphics, voice acting was good, but halfway, the story was just like....mehhh. The originality factor that the original two had completely lost it in the third.

Were the games continuous or did they have seperate storylines?

They all were completely different stories (with the exception of Blue Sphere on GBA which was a little side story/continuation of SO2). SO1 and SO2 kind of had a link but it was very slight. SO2 was a completely different story. SO3 had some cameos of SO1 and SO2 (like few items had references back to the old games), nothing major. SO3 was just really predictable if you played SO1 and SO2 in the form of story structure which kind of made me unhappy to play it when i got to the middle of Disc 2. Play Star Ocean 1 and 2. They are great games, play SO3, you will see.

The 3 had a link, in terms of locations, terms objects and such, but they are unique stories too. I never got to play SO 1 or 2 (hoping they would bring them states side for the PSP :( But SO 3 was a really good game back in the day.

berries and some items of course were the same lol XD as far as location, SO3 was in a completely different world. SO1 and SO2 only shared one location but their was a time lapse difference, very insignificant to the story. Can u say SO1 and SO2 coming to PSP...for Japan only? (T__T)

But isnt Styx and the Great Tablet or whatever the same that were in previous games? I think the one with Cloud (SO2?). Dont know, I read the mangas and they had the place but with a different name. And I know SO 3 is in a whole different era SD

Avatar image for ForlonHope
ForlonHope

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#33 ForlonHope
Member since 2006 • 1653 Posts
[QUOTE="ForlonHope"][QUOTE="Zidaneski"]

[QUOTE="ForlonHope"][QUOTE="Zidaneski"]^^^WHOOOHOOO!! Thats right! Never underestimate the power of Final Fantasy! Can't wait for next month.Zidaneski

To answer your question on the Star Ocean locked thread, IMO SO3 wasn't that great because I played Star Ocean and Star Ocean 2. In SO3, it was almost the same exact plot twist from the first two, which kind of ruined the story for me. The battle system was great, good graphics, voice acting was good, but halfway, the story was just like....mehhh. The originality factor that the original two had completely lost it in the third.

Were the games continuous or did they have seperate storylines?

They all were completely different stories (with the exception of Blue Sphere on GBA which was a little side story/continuation of SO2). SO1 and SO2 kind of had a link but it was very slight. SO2 was a completely different story. SO3 had some cameos of SO1 and SO2 (like few items had references back to the old games), nothing major. SO3 was just really predictable if you played SO1 and SO2 in the form of story structure which kind of made me unhappy to play it when i got to the middle of Disc 2. Play Star Ocean 1 and 2. They are great games, play SO3, you will see.

The battles I thought were pretty good but I couldn't stand the cutscenes. I guess its because I had gotten use to FF, Kingdom Hearts, Dark Cloud 1 and 2, Rogue Galaxy, Valkyrie Profile 2, and the Jak series so much that SO3 felt like a step backwards in terms of story progression. If they can fix that in SO4 then I will by all means play it since they aren't continous either.

Wat was momentous with SO2 for me was the possibility of over 80+ endings. That was what made me a fan, that I could play the game over and over and enjoy it knowing that if I play a certain way, I will get a different ending. I play Star Ocean 2 from time to time, knowing the story over and over again but trying my way into getting the different relationship and hopefully a different ending
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

[QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="sa10kun"]You could always try folklore. Some targets have it for 30 buck I hear. No one really deserves the blame. If you want to blame someone blame ms for buying exclusivity for everything.Prinze


No, blame Sony for not buying exclusives for anything.

That's so naive, you blame a company based on their principles.



No it's not naive. Sony did buy exclusives last gen on the PS2 when devs were swarming the console but this gen when the need exclusives they want to brag about their new principle of not buying exclusives. Sony has the strange idea that third party devs would act like they did last gen when they were throwing themselves over the PS2 but so far it's the opposite, they are losing third party devs instead of gaining them and Sony need to act fast.
Avatar image for Zidaneski
Zidaneski

9266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Zidaneski
Member since 2003 • 9266 Posts
I hope that doesn't mean you have to play the game over eighty times from the beginning. And it sounds like all the endings are somewhat similar except maybe the main character goes off and kisses a different girl.
Avatar image for ForlonHope
ForlonHope

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#36 ForlonHope
Member since 2006 • 1653 Posts

But isnt Styx and the Great Tablet or whatever the same that were in previous games? I think the one with Cloud (SO2?). Dont know, I read the mangas and they had the place but with a different name. And I know SO 3 is in a whole different era SD

kenshinhimura16
Claude* I dont understand how Styx has anything to do with Star Ocean 2. I must be missing something *SPOILER* In SO2, you didnt do a universal warp like Styx in SO3 where you find out ur really just 3d instead of 4d or whatever the bollocks was. In SO2, it was you finding out in Eluria Tower that the 12 wise men were gonna destroy Expel and they do and you are warped to the 12 wise men's planet. You find out Rena's past blah blah and thats the plot twist. *End of Spoiler* So I dont remember anything about Styx being associated with SO2 and Expel again...
Avatar image for ForlonHope
ForlonHope

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#37 ForlonHope
Member since 2006 • 1653 Posts
I hope that doesn't mean you have to play the game over eighty times from the beginning. And it sounds like all the endings are somewhat similar except maybe the main character goes off and kisses a different girl.Zidaneski
u can play it from the beginning or make certain save points at crucial private actions. It wasnt really much about the main character. It was trying to get the hard endings with supporting character X supporting character ending and trying to avoid the two main characters.
Avatar image for Ozzie234
Ozzie234

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Ozzie234
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts

FF13 is being shown at E3 and there's talk of a demo:

http://talkplaystation.com/final-fantasy-13-demo-and-e3-confirmed/

Floppy_Jim
Pre-rendered? lol
Avatar image for Prinze
Prinze

4492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 Prinze
Member since 2003 • 4492 Posts
[QUOTE="Prinze"]

[QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="sa10kun"]You could always try folklore. Some targets have it for 30 buck I hear. No one really deserves the blame. If you want to blame someone blame ms for buying exclusivity for everything.JLF1


No, blame Sony for not buying exclusives for anything.

That's so naive, you blame a company based on their principles.



No it's not naive. Sony did buy exclusives last gen on the PS2 when devs were swarming the console but this gen when the need exclusives they want to brag about their new principle of not buying exclusives. Sony has the strange idea that third party devs would act like they did last gen when they were throwing themselves over the PS2 but so far it's the opposite, they are losing third party devs instead of gaining them and Sony need to act fast.

You're original statement is the definition of naive, you're completely blaming Sony based on the fact that they are not throwing money around to gain competitive advantage amongst 3rd party developers. Buying exclusives doesn't mean success, it's possible they can lose money because a game did not bring in an ROI (Return on Investment). It is entirely possible that Sony can make money on their current games they are planning to release, while MS actually loses on certain titles they paid for. Sony is out to make money, not bragging rights to show off titles to competitiors.

Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#40 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts
[QUOTE="kenshinhimura16"]

But isnt Styx and the Great Tablet or whatever the same that were in previous games? I think the one with Cloud (SO2?). Dont know, I read the mangas and they had the place but with a different name. And I know SO 3 is in a whole different era SD

ForlonHope

Claude* I dont understand how Styx has anything to do with Star Ocean 2. I must be missing something *SPOILER* In SO2, you didnt do a universal warp like Styx in SO3 where you find out ur really just 3d instead of 4d or whatever the bollocks was. In SO2, it was you finding out in Eluria Tower that the 12 wise men were gonna destroy Expel and they do and you are warped to the 12 wise men's planet. You find out Rena's past blah blah and thats the plot twist. *End of Spoiler* So I dont remember anything about Styx being associated with SO2 and Expel again...

But wasnt there one were a tablet spoke to the team and helped them?

Avatar image for odin2019
odin2019

4677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#41 odin2019
Member since 2006 • 4677 Posts
Even though MS is getting all these rpgs released on their console they still have yet to make one really good jrpg game for the xbox360 thats a mega hit. I think until they do get a mega hit jrpg on their console then its not going to really cause problems for the sony fanbase but if they don't put out really good games in that category your really not missing much and nobody is likely to complain
Avatar image for gamenerd15
gamenerd15

4529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 gamenerd15
Member since 2007 • 4529 Posts

How come no one considers SRPG's as an RPG. I mean Disgaea 3 and Valkyria look to be enough to keep you busy for quite awhile. All people do is complain about Disgaea's graphics or how Valkyria isn't really an RPG. Strategy RPG's like Disgaea never have great graphics. It is actually better with it being 2d like that. Just like when Mana went into 3d for PS2 is sucked. There are more things in a game than just graphics. Everybody considers Fire Emblem an RPG, so what makes Valkyria Chronicles any different. I think it is kind of cool how you can actually move for real instead of just going square by square and one turn per person during a phase. You get a set number of turns and you can use them however you want.

I want some JRPG;s too, but a lot of these new ones don't do anything much but tweak the formula. I also want the 360 Tales game, but the ps2 ones looked like they only tweaked the ps1 games. I think people should wait until the game is closer to a release date and stop flying off the handle worrying about games you can't play until 09. I wouldn't say Disgaea 3 is a consolation prize. That game is August, and SO is next year probably in August as well. So I am pretty sure you will know whether or not you will finish Disgaea by then.

Avatar image for adamg78
adamg78

636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#43 adamg78
Member since 2004 • 636 Posts
there are rpg coming out ,but not coming out till next year
Avatar image for Lub1
Lub1

517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Lub1
Member since 2005 • 517 Posts
yah, there hasn't come a game out build up for PS3 that can compete with the ps2 RPG's, which is sad :(
Avatar image for adamg78
adamg78

636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 adamg78
Member since 2004 • 636 Posts
oh ya I am also an RPG fane but I dont really care that there is not many RPg games.when all the action & adventer type games that have came out are great so far beats the ps2 out with them.
Avatar image for gekidami
gekidami

2446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 gekidami
Member since 2004 • 2446 Posts
^ Old Snake is hidden on the wall above, can you find him?
Avatar image for nonshuhlahnt
nonshuhlahnt

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 nonshuhlahnt
Member since 2008 • 61 Posts

well sence i dont care for rpgs i shouldnt even be in here. BUT they are going to have rpgs such as final fantasy 13 and then final fantasy versus 13(which i absolutely cannot wait for). You just have to be patient.

ps hopefully there will be a final fantasy 7 remake. I know its overated but its the first ps1 game i played so im hooked.

Avatar image for Goku2639
Goku2639

5450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#50 Goku2639
Member since 2005 • 5450 Posts

1. What is SO?? Damn abreviations

2. Who cares, MGS4 comes out tomorrow