This topic is locked from further discussion.
Both games have their pro's and cons...
Mw2 is too much kill as much as you can in 20 seconds before you get shot in the back.....
Bad Company, give you alittle more time to strategize and find alternative routes....
Both feel like a little better painted over version of their previous game....
. There is no need to compare games..GrandJuryComparing is how you prove something is better, you always have to compare. Are you smarter then a 5th grader? Or do you both share the same IQ?
[QUOTE="GrandJury"]. There is no need to compare games..JavieralijandroComparing is how you prove something is better, you always have to compare. Are you smarter then a 5th grader? Or do you both share the same IQ?
Ooooooooo!
[QUOTE="GrandJury"]. There is no need to compare games..JavieralijandroComparing is how you prove something is better, you always have to compare. Are you smarter then a 5th grader? Or do you both share the same IQ?You don't NEED to compare every single FPS game that is almost like one another. Let me ask you something. How in the world are you ever going to get a straight answer if and when people have different opinions. MW2 vs BC2...Good lord I can only imagine when the full game comes out. How are you going to prove that MW2 is actually better if someone else says BC2 is actually better? Both games are awesome period.
Oh and that little comment of yours, pretty funny. I never considered myself the smartest person on the forums, hell you might have me beat in intellegence and that is fine, but I know that threads like these are not needed every time a game is even remotely like another game. Especially if they are both really good.
[QUOTE="Javieralijandro"][QUOTE="GrandJury"]. There is no need to compare games..GrandJuryComparing is how you prove something is better, you always have to compare. Are you smarter then a 5th grader? Or do you both share the same IQ?You don't NEED to compare every single FPS game that is almost like one another. Let me ask you something. How in the world are you ever going to get a straight answer if and when people have different opinions. MW2 vs BC2...Good lord I can only imagine when the full game comes out. How are you going to prove that MW2 is actually better if someone else says BC2 is actually better?
Majority.
You don't NEED to compare every single FPS game that is almost like one another. Let me ask you something. How in the world are you ever going to get a straight answer if and when people have different opinions. MW2 vs BC2...Good lord I can only imagine when the full game comes out. How are you going to prove that MW2 is actually better if someone else says BC2 is actually better?[QUOTE="GrandJury"][QUOTE="Javieralijandro"] Comparing is how you prove something is better, you always have to compare. Are you smarter then a 5th grader? Or do you both share the same IQ?ParisHilton1Fan
Majority.
There is still no reason for threads like this to keep popping up. Hell BC2 is still in its beta and people feel the need to make threads.See how that worked. See how some people said MW2 and others BC2...Now another thing, I am trying to wrap my mind around how certain people agree that threads like these should exsist. All they do is end up with a bunch of fanboys supporting their game to the end. Oh and how can you compare a fully released game to a beta?GrandJuryWho goes by what people say? Im talking about frame rate, HD resolution, number of things going on screen. I already know mw2 lost in HD resolution because we all know MW2 runs at 600p.
See how that worked. See how some people said MW2 and others BC2...Now another thing, I am trying to wrap my mind around how certain people agree that threads like these should exsist. All they do is end up with a bunch of fanboys supporting their game to the end. Oh and how can you compare a fully released game to a beta?GrandJuryIf the beta is better you can easily compare them. :D In the end BC2 can only really get better. I respect everyones opinion, we all have different tastes.
[QUOTE="GrandJury"]. There is no need to compare games..JavieralijandroComparing is how you prove something is better, you always have to compare. Are you smarter then a 5th grader? Or do you both share the same IQ?
Yes, that's true. comparison is one of the ways, if not the only way (at times), to reach a definitive conclusion of what's better. But in this particular situation where we have to compare games, especially those that are fundamentally different (even though they're in the same genre... which is also something people can argue) it becomes extremely difficult to determine a clear-cut winner in a universal sense. Opinions will always vary, and even if there will be a majority favoring one game over the other, the argument about which game is king will remain perpetual.
For individuals, it's a simple task to accomplish, as we can judge games by the intrinsic joy we derive from playing them (i.e. "i like game A more than game B, therefore game A is better"). But to come up with an absolute, generally accepted victor is an impossible task. Note, i'm only speaking of MW and BFBC2, and NOT in a general sense, as there are situations where such a victor may be created; especially if the entire comparison was about specific characteristics or if was restricted by guidelines, rules or laws which help make the comparison process objective.
For instance, we can easily compare BC2 and MW2 by their metacritic scores, or the number of copies sold... or even create a custom comparison method (i.e. we can compare which game is better by looking at the first 1000 GS user submitted scores or something). All of these would be valid comparisons, but it is also important to acknowledge that none of these comparisons illustrate which game is truly better, but because we created rules (restrictions) as to how we compare these games, we can now come up with some kind of result. However, there's even a problem with that method, as there will always be people who'll say that metacritic scores don't mean jack as they're based on someone else's opinions or that copies sold have nothing to do with game quality... and guess what, those would be valid points... and because there's nothing that can debunk those points, we will arguing over and over... and we still won't really know which game is universally better...
so if people want to argue about games, please, by all means... hell, it could be enjoyable trying to sell your points once in a while, but these comparisons it will be endless (until the topic runs dry that is)and ultimately pointlesss as everything based on personal biases and tastes.
I
See how that worked. See how some people said MW2 and others BC2...Now another thing, I am trying to wrap my mind around how certain people agree that threads like these should exsist. All they do is end up with a bunch of fanboys supporting their game to the end. Oh and how can you compare a fully released game to a beta?GrandJury
I don't think I've seen one thread that you do think exists. Quit bickering over this little ****, you're never going to change anything. The reason people like to compare these sorts of things is because people are curious to get other people's views. Not necessarily to determine which is best.
Anyways, Bad Company 2 looks better, and it's gameplay is more tactical, which is something I prefer. So if I had to choose one of them to own, it'd be BC2.
Right now I am downloading my BETA for BC2, I have been playing MW2 since the night it came out. Want to clear that up so I don't send feelings all over the place. Now, I've been watching videos on youtube of BC2 and many are saying it is crap vs MW2. I haven't played it yet, but due to video itself I can say that BC2 looks like it will out do MW2. The graphics of BC2 are so smooth and crisp. The destructible environment looks so tempting to just destroy. I love how in MP you can actually drive; Hummers, Tanks, ATV's or whatever. I think that is a neat addition. Don't get me wrong, MW2 is great. I cannot really put down the sticks for more than 24 hours but I am so stoked for BC2. I really love more realistic type of things, so I guess thats why. But why hate? Many people on youtube are freaking out over this, the people who say oh BC2 looks better, the MW2 fanboys run wild and get upset. Why? Why not just be an open-minded gamer and just say like I say, ONE looks good THE OTHER looks better. For those who've played the BETA already, what are your thoughts.VIBE8610
I think MW2 looks about 5 times better than BC2. I played the beta yesterday and it immediately made me want to play a good online FPS, so that very day I went and got MW2. BC2 is a lot of fun. So is COD. I don't really like the vehicle thing, because the tank person can just kill any foot soldier in sight, plus I don't like the graphics in BC2 as much as MW2, but it is still tons of fun to play.
I played the beta and it was boring. the pace was slow and it wasnt that fun. Maybe its because i've been playing so much mw2. BC2 graphics and vehicles are good though
As I have MW2 already, I'll be getting both MAG and BC2. I like FPS so why compare? The DV teams of these games didn't come together and say what can we do to look like or be better the the other. If you can make a good game they will buy. Simple as that.
semi truck vs compact car......they each do different things, they do them well.......u cant really compare them equally though.
i like both......bc2 is awesome, ive had alot of fun with it......mw2 is awesome really good, but completely different....other than shooting people and stuff.
When will people learn. There is no need to compare games. MW2 is great and from the looks of things BC2 will be the same thing. You will either play one or the other or both. End of story.GrandJurybest answer really. Why does one game have to be better than the other. If you have fun playing both then isn't that the whole point of gaming
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment