I am absolutely serious. Just because it's a niche game doesn't mean Cross Edge won't be a good game. Not every RPG has to be a huge game. White Knight Chronicles will be a big RPG though and a lot of people are excited for it. And so what if FFXIII is coming to the 360 as well? A good RPG is a good RPG whether it's exclusive or multi-plat. Valkyria Chronicles is a strategy game first, but it has RPG elements. I think you want exclusives for the PS3, but I could care less if they are exclusive or not. I want to play the game, not the system. Every RPG out for the PS3 is solid, even if almost all of them are multi-plat. I'm excited for the games to be coming out, so I'm sorry if you're not. Obviously we have different mindsets, which is ok :)
I already mentioned the Wii is on the upturn as well. 360 has solid JRPGs, but nothing special other than Vesperia and even that's coming to the PS3. The 360's "high profile" games are nothing great (The Last Remnant, Blue Dragon, etc.)
yokofox33
First, the whole point of me mentioning big budget game is because smaller titles tends to follow the big title.
JRPG fans have selective taste, so just randomly throwing JRPG to a system proved to be formula for failures for JRPG developers. Which is why they always wait for Final Fantasy to come out to know for sure that there are 5 million+ JRPG fans having the particular system.
Variety in JRPG is very important to me since i've been burned by the media calling cr@p AAA while true gem getting mediocre rating (the entire Valkyrie Profile for example)
That variety doesn't come unless a company sets a wave of JRPGs to particular system. Final Fantasy is able to do that, but this gen it is less reliable thanks to it going multi-platform. Dragon Quest is the other, which is going to DS and Wii.
and no, Valkyria Chronicles is not a RPG. I see nothing RPG about it. Maybe leveling, but so many games have leveling these days, and we don't call those RPG. Equipment? also just about every game seems to have those these days. This is just plain ol' strategy game, there is no sub genre and no nothing. There is no exploration, and NPC chatting is nearly zero. I had more interaction in Romance of the Three Kingdom games, which is a game that no one will mistake it for RPG.
I feel like only reason Valkyria Chronicles is called JRPG is because it's made in Japan, and it has anime styled cut scene which seems to make people automatically think "oh! it must be JRPG!"
Number of games is often more important than quality of the games. People like variety and people's value towards a game is subjective. Give me 100 marios, and it will worth less than 1 Rule of Rose to me. PS1 and PS2 didn't have major success just because it had quality games, but because it had largest quantity of games.
So considering all that, yes PS3 future looks shaky at best for the moment when it comes to RPGs. I think my assessment of the situation is fairly accurate considering how the history of gaming industry looked like, and current situation of the industry.
Log in to comment