This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mareczek99
Mareczek99

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 Mareczek99
Member since 2006 • 357 Posts

Hi,

I would like to ask You guys, if it is worth to actually bother OCing my CPU at this stage.

I got an AMD Athlon II x4 640 running at stock 3.0Ghz

I got some stock cooling, no extra fans, no water cooling ect.

My PSU is a 450W no brand one but it is relatively new (bought about 3-4 months ago)

I already OCed my GPU (HD5670 Iceq) up to 820Mhz GPU and 1030Mhz Memory clocks and I also OCed my double Geil DDR3's 2GB sticks up to 1600.

It all runs fine and stable, so I was wondering, since my ASRock N68-GS3 UCC has an option to play around with CPU clocks, if it is anyhow timeworthy to fool around with it.

Oh.. typos..

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#2 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

Hi,

I would like to ask You guys, if it is worth to actually bother OCing my CPU at this stage.

I got an AMD Athlon II x4 640 running at stock 3.0Ghz

I got some stock cooling, no extra fans, no water cooling ect.

My PSU is a 450W no brand one but it is relatively new (bought about 3-4 months ago)

I already OCed my GPU (HD5670 Iceq) up to 820Mhz GPU and 1030Mhz Memory clocks and I also OCed my double Geil DDR3's 2GB sticks up to 1600.

It all runs fine and stable, so I was wondering, since my ASRock N68-GS3 UCC has an option to play around with CPU clocks, if it is anyhow timeworthy to fool around with it.

Oh.. typos..

Mareczek99

Dont bother with OC'ing running that HD5670 ´meanig you won't be able to play games/settings you couldn't before the OC´. If you can afford a better grahics would it give you alot better performance in games, the HD5670 is weak oc'ed or not, OC'ing is great but overclocking that CPU would not benefit you in any way. BTW what resolution are you running games?

Avatar image for Mareczek99
Mareczek99

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#3 Mareczek99
Member since 2006 • 357 Posts

[QUOTE="Mareczek99"]

Hi,

I would like to ask You guys, if it is worth to actually bother OCing my CPU at this stage.

I got an AMD Athlon II x4 640 running at stock 3.0Ghz

I got some stock cooling, no extra fans, no water cooling ect.

My PSU is a 450W no brand one but it is relatively new (bought about 3-4 months ago)

I already OCed my GPU (HD5670 Iceq) up to 820Mhz GPU and 1030Mhz Memory clocks and I also OCed my double Geil DDR3's 2GB sticks up to 1600.

It all runs fine and stable, so I was wondering, since my ASRock N68-GS3 UCC has an option to play around with CPU clocks, if it is anyhow timeworthy to fool around with it.

Oh.. typos..

swehunt

Dont bother with OC'ing running that HD5670 ´meanig you won't be able to play games/settings you couldn't before the OC´. If you can afford a better grahics would it give you alot better performance in games, the HD5670 is weak oc'ed or not, OC'ing is great but overclocking that CPU would not benefit you in any way. BTW what resolution are you running games?


I got a 18,5 inch monitor supporting up to 1600x900 but I usually play at 1366x768 with 4x AA. I know that card is a budget (though plays most games with high settings and AA + Vsync fine) I will buy a 6850 soon but I wanted to know, if the Athlon II x4 640 can squeeze out some additional power via OverClocking it.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#4 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

[QUOTE="swehunt"]

[QUOTE="Mareczek99"]

Hi,

I would like to ask You guys, if it is worth to actually bother OCing my CPU at this stage.

I got an AMD Athlon II x4 640 running at stock 3.0Ghz

I got some stock cooling, no extra fans, no water cooling ect.

My PSU is a 450W no brand one but it is relatively new (bought about 3-4 months ago)

I already OCed my GPU (HD5670 Iceq) up to 820Mhz GPU and 1030Mhz Memory clocks and I also OCed my double Geil DDR3's 2GB sticks up to 1600.

It all runs fine and stable, so I was wondering, since my ASRock N68-GS3 UCC has an option to play around with CPU clocks, if it is anyhow timeworthy to fool around with it.

Oh.. typos..

Mareczek99

Dont bother with OC'ing running that HD5670 ´meanig you won't be able to play games/settings you couldn't before the OC´. If you can afford a better grahics would it give you alot better performance in games, the HD5670 is weak oc'ed or not, OC'ing is great but overclocking that CPU would not benefit you in any way. BTW what resolution are you running games?


I got a 18,5 inch monitor supporting up to 1600x900 but I usually play at 1366x768 with 4x AA. I know that card is a budget (though plays most games with high settings and AA + Vsync fine) I will buy a 6850 soon but I wanted to know, if the Athlon II x4 640 can squeeze out some additional power via OverClocking it.

Yes, the CPU will just about linear increase it's performance with a OC of the CPU freq, add bus speeds to that (sice it's not a BE CPU and you cant OC via multi) you'll gain even a little better than liniear. But better CPU performance won't help with the games. Going with a HD6850 you should aim a little higher with the CPU, getting it to 3.5Ghz x4 should be a simple task if you got even a half decent chip. 1600*900 and even more so 1366*768 isn't that demanding resolution and a HD6850 should run most games very good. The resolution much balance what part gets most stress, the lower the resolution the more the performance of the CPU matter, the higher the more a game stress the GPU, with a HD6850 the CPU might be the weaker link in RTS or heavily CPU dependant games particular running a 1366*768 resolution, OC would probably help in such a scenario.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#5 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Depends on how you overclock it, but you'll need an insane voltage increase to get it stable around 3.7ghz-4.0ghz(and I'm not sure that's possible).

Avatar image for gamerns
gamerns

374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 gamerns
Member since 2011 • 374 Posts

Your system is well balanced and there's no reason to overclock anything. Only if you get a better gfx card like 6870, then a little CPU overclock would make sense. And no reason to lower the resolution eather, especially for an LCD monitor. I play at 1920x1080 with HD4670 512MB, so I'm sure your 5670 can handle 1600x900 just fine.

Avatar image for Mareczek99
Mareczek99

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#7 Mareczek99
Member since 2006 • 357 Posts

Your system is well balanced and there's no reason to overclock anything. Only if you get a better gfx card like 6870, then a little CPU overclock would make sense. And no reason to lower the resolution eather, especially for an LCD monitor. I play at 1920x1080 with HD4670 512MB, so I'm sure your 5670 can handle 1600x900 just fine.

gamerns


That is true, but I get some issues with screen size and position while swapping resolutions, so in games that does not support 1600x900 will have to swich back. Sadly my monitor does not auto-adjust itself when jumping from 1600x900 which is kind of bummer really. Dunno why..

Avatar image for gamerns
gamerns

374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 gamerns
Member since 2011 • 374 Posts

When you change the resolution just click the "auto" button on your monitor and it should set everything right, and it will probably remember that setting, too.

Avatar image for Mareczek99
Mareczek99

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#9 Mareczek99
Member since 2006 • 357 Posts

When you change the resolution just click the "auto" button on your monitor and it should set everything right, and it will probably remember that setting, too.

gamerns

I tried, but it seems to not remember that setting. I can adjust it manually, but I truly hate doing that.

It'd a LED Phillips 196VL and seems like 1600x900 is simply fit to the screen but it looses it's sharpness.

Is it possible it's not a fully supported res. but shrunk to fit the screen?

I don't really mind playing on 1366x768 in a screen this size with 4x AA but beeing able to play on 1600x900 would be nice actually.