What would you like to seen in Diablo 3?

Anything that may come to your mind!

Let your Diablo imagination run wild.

A rogue class :?Crimsader

To add onto this, more classes than what they're offering.

A deep storylinebiggest_loser

Dragon Agebiggest_loser

complex choices biggest_loser

Dragon Agebiggest_loser

complex choices biggest_loser

I would like to see more classes.

I want join groups of 20 homies and repeatedly kill baal for phat loot!

No bots, duping, hacking, rushing, online stores, and all that other horrible stuff (I rush, but I would prefer there is not any rushing, although bots are the most of my concern).

I think they are doing most things right though, and fixing all the broken mechanics. I cannot wait for this game!

For them to patch up Battle.net 2 before Diablo 3 comes out. I also want the story to be cool.

I want to see more chalenging game . In D2 80+ character didnt have any problems soloing hell . I want to see in D3 even highest lvl having a chalange soloing.

For them to patch up Battle.net 2 before Diablo 3 comes out. I also want the story to be cool.

ArchonOver

Mule Bank

A deep storyline with complex choices, like in Dragon Age. biggest_loser

Mule Bank

Tuzolord

I would like to see more classes.

blizzgeek

no cookie cutter builds /pipedream

no cookie cutter builds /pipedream

BLaZe462

At least they nerfed Static Field way back when, though. That crap was just silly.

I would like to see them take out that crafting BS. I want to freaking chop people in half with lots of blood...not craft crap.

I would like to see them take out that crafting BS. I want to freaking chop people in half with lots of blood...not craft crap.

edinsftw

if you check out the artisan video they mention that there is a new form of crafting in d3.

Rainbows. :P

I'd like to see low level skills not become obsolete. I'm pretty sure they have addressed that.StopThePresses

This is only true with some kind of buildings, As example: my lvl 89 Fanatic Zealot kill using a lvl 6 skill: Zeal.

What I want: a high res Diablo II with at least 8 players supported. The cut down to 5 is embarrassing.

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]I'd like to see low level skills not become obsolete. I'm pretty sure they have addressed that.Ondoval

This is only true with some kind of buildings, As example: my lvl 89 Fanatic Zealot kill using a lvl 6 skill: Zeal.

What I want: a high res Diablo II with at least 8 players supported. The cut down to 5 is embarrassing.

I would like to see a release date. Oh wait.. that wasn't your question. Umm.. I agree with post above me.Elann2008

I want to see a more complex random dungeon creator where you can't memorize the layout of a level.

[QUOTE="Ondoval"]

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]I'd like to see low level skills not become obsolete. I'm pretty sure they have addressed that.StopThePresses

This is only true with some kind of buildings, As example: my lvl 89 Fanatic Zealot kill using a lvl 6 skill: Zeal.

What I want: a high res Diablo II with at least 8 players supported. The cut down to 5 is embarrassing.

8 players supported: 4 vs 4 team duels = heavy incentives to keep playing in order to equip fully specialized duel characters (VERY expensive).

5 players limit: no team duels = 1/2 of the multiplayer fun disgraced = no incentives to keep playing due the lack of challenges.

Any defense about the reduction of the max amount of players from 8 to 5 is absurd, is a feature nerfed there's no other way to describe it.

I would like to see more classes.

blizzgeek

there are over 20 classes in D3, check the update on IGN or kotaku. dunno y gs hasnt covered it,

I would like to see a release date. Oh wait.. that wasn't your question. Umm.. I agree with post above me.Elann2008

[QUOTE="blizzgeek"]

I would like to see more classes.

salil_707

there are over 20 classes in D3, check the update on IGN or kotaku. dunno y gs hasnt covered it,

It will be 5 starting classes, at least with the initial game, which 4 of them were already known: Barbarian, Monk, Wizzard and Witch Hunter Looks very probable that the 5th one will be some kind of archer/ranger, also, but this is speculative.

another thing i dont understand is y didnt people like the "bright and colorful" demo shown last year and asked blizzard to make it darker?

the game looked fantastic back then, now it does look fantastic, jus a bit too dark for my liking.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_AIobaRP8U3A/SjIFik-UOxI/AAAAAAAAAKY/hCA8nd2fuwM/s400/war+priest+6.jpg

-The above as something akin to a Paladin class.

-Starcraft 2 depth of moddability : P. Seriously it would be great to try to see somebody attempt to make an RTS out of Diablo

-killer kittens

-more classes

-a bit more of a throwback to the artistic style of Diablo II. I'm okay with the current one but I think Diablo III is currently suffering from the "pualdrons that have their own pauldron" stick.

Well honestly Matt Uelmen isn't doint the music for it like the first 2 diablo games..

That was one of my favorite things about Diablo was the music, help set the mood of the game.

He went to Runic games which made Torchlight, and working on Torchlight 2 and (mmo)

I still am interested in Diablo 3, I hope that whoever is composing the music for it, does a great job at it. I have waited for this game for almost 10 years.

I hope it still has some very dark atmospheric settings, like Diablo 1 and some places in Diablo2.

I would like to see excellent optimization on performance...

5 players limit: no team duels = 1/2 of the multiplayer fun disgraced = no incentives to keep playing due the lack of challenges.

Any defense about the reduction of the max amount of players from 8 to 5 is absurd, is a feature nerfed there's no other way to describe it.

Ondoval

I never once team dueled in the game, and barely ever dueled either. I don't care about it. I would not care if they removed PvP from the game entirely. Actually, I'd probably be glad if they did, the way it was implemented, where people who were supposed to be helping could go to town and turn hostile and just generally be annoying. Anyway, it's obvious that a large degree of the game was about what gear you have, which made PvP rather pointless anyway, in my opinion.

You're not going to sell me on the effect it has on a feature I rarely used though.

For PvE, eight players was always a zerg-fest, plain and simple. Stuff flying around everywhere, and (especially if several sorceresses are involved) it's like, "What is even going on? Oh, it doesn't matter. Everything is dead already." If eight players, then why not twelve or twenty? It seems like people are just arbitrarily fixated on the number eight because that's what it was in the previous game. Diablo II was already an easy game. I'm not fooling myself about that. Having that many players just put it in super-easy mode though. All the enemies have more targets to go after, and they can't make everything hit harder because then people would just die in one hit or something, which would obviously be even more stupid.

They could / should (I don't care if they do or not, really) make a seperate PvP arena for people who actually think it's fun to see whose armor has higher resistance to each other's attacks or whatever it is that makes people find PvP in an ARPG compelling.

[QUOTE="blizzgeek"]

I would like to see more classes.

salil_707

there are over 20 classes in D3, check the update on IGN or kotaku. dunno y gs hasnt covered it,

[QUOTE="Ondoval"]5 players limit: no team duels = 1/2 of the multiplayer fun disgraced = no incentives to keep playing due the lack of challenges.

Any defense about the reduction of the max amount of players from 8 to 5 is absurd, is a feature nerfed there's no other way to describe it.

StopThePresses

I never once team dueled in the game, and barely ever dueled either. I don't care about it. I would not care if they removed PvP from the game entirely. Actually, I'd probably be glad if they did, the way it was implemented, where people who were supposed to be helping could go to town and turn hostile and just generally be annoying. Anyway, it's obvious that a large degree of the game was about what gear you have, which made PvP rather pointless anyway, in my opinion.

You're not going to sell me on the effect it has on a feature I rarely used though.

Single player in Diablo II makes not much sense. Cooperative multiplayer is mainly to reach level 70+ in a week or two, or for trading, but once you reach Hell you can either need more people to deal against monster immunities or either you have a very versatile build with god tier items. And when you reach the god tier items status the real deal isn't Diablo Clone or the Uber Tristam, but PvP. PvP oriented gear is more rare, expensive and hard to attain than any other stuff in the game, and to play against skilled players with god tier items is the top of the top.

The game is still broadly popular due high end gear is very hard to obtain, and PvP is what keeps the interest for these god tier items. Disable the PvP and you will see the same coop game that keeps losing players week after week as Left 4 Dead 2.

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]

[QUOTE="Ondoval"]5 players limit: no team duels = 1/2 of the multiplayer fun disgraced = no incentives to keep playing due the lack of challenges.

Any defense about the reduction of the max amount of players from 8 to 5 is absurd, is a feature nerfed there's no other way to describe it.

Ondoval

I never once team dueled in the game, and barely ever dueled either. I don't care about it. I would not care if they removed PvP from the game entirely. Actually, I'd probably be glad if they did, the way it was implemented, where people who were supposed to be helping could go to town and turn hostile and just generally be annoying. Anyway, it's obvious that a large degree of the game was about what gear you have, which made PvP rather pointless anyway, in my opinion.

You're not going to sell me on the effect it has on a feature I rarely used though.

Single player in Diablo II makes not much sense. Cooperative multiplayer is mainly to reach level 70+ in a week or two, or for trading, but once you reach Hell you can either need more people to deal against monster immunities or either you have a very versatile build with god tier items. And when you reach the god tier items status the real deal isn't Diablo Clone or the Uber Tristam, but PvP. PvP oriented gear is more rare, expensive and hard to attain than any other stuff in the game, and to play against skilled players with god tier items is the top of the top.

The game is still broadly popular due high end gear is very hard to obtain, and PvP is what keeps the interest for these god tier items. Disable the PvP and you will see the same coop game that keeps losing players week after week as Left 4 Dead 2.

[QUOTE="salil_707"]

[QUOTE="blizzgeek"]

I would like to see more classes.

StopThePresses

there are over 20 classes in D3, check the update on IGN or kotaku. dunno y gs hasnt covered it,

as i said i cant remember wher i had read it.... if i do find it, you will br the 1st person i shall tell!

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]

[QUOTE="salil_707"]

there are over 20 classes in D3, check the update on IGN or kotaku. dunno y gs hasnt covered it,

salil_707

as i said i cant remember wher i had read it.... if i do find it, you will br the 1st person i shall tell!

I don't see there being more than 7 or 8 classes, and thats at the most.

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]

[QUOTE="salil_707"]

there are over 20 classes in D3, check the update on IGN or kotaku. dunno y gs hasnt covered it,

salil_707

as i said i cant remember wher i had read it.... if i do find it, you will br the 1st person i shall tell!

Of course you don't have the link, because unless one of their reporters really misconstrued something, it doesn't exist.

I want a new Diablo game closer to the original in artistic style. Diablo II was way too "cartoonish" for me. Darker = better. We're descending into Hell after all.

I want a new Diablo game closer to the original in artistic style. Diablo II was way too "cartoonish" for me. Darker = better. We're descending into Hell after all.

Sheplerizer

[QUOTE="Sheplerizer"]

I want a new Diablo game closer to the original in artistic style. Diablo II was way too "cartoonish" for me. Darker = better. We're descending into Hell after all.

StopThePresses

The end of the game in both is an adventure into hell, no? That's besides the point for me anyways. I always liked the original more than Diablo II. Not really sure why. The atmosphere just drew me in more.

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="Sheplerizer"]

I want a new Diablo game closer to the original in artistic style. Diablo II was way too "cartoonish" for me. Darker = better. We're descending into Hell after all.

Sheplerizer

The end of the game in both is an adventure into hell, no? That's besides the point for me anyways. I always liked the original more than Diablo II. Not really sure why. The atmosphere just drew me in more.

Well, technically they could all use the spells...but LOL.

Nazi zombies....

[QUOTE="salil_707"]

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"] How about you either provide a link and a quote or we're going to have to (probably correctly) assume that you don't know what you are talking about?

StopThePresses

as i said i cant remember wher i had read it.... if i do find it, you will br the 1st person i shall tell!

Of course you don't have the link, because unless one of their reporters really misconstrued something, it doesn't exist.

i think its possible as Diablo 2's expansion pack which I had played had around 7-8 classes. These included the Paladin and Assassin which, if I recall correctly were not in Diablo 2. So, we might not see all the classes at launch. They might keep adding classes as DLC's.

But, hey if there ARE 20 classes, its a win!

:D