Street Fighter II
Fallout 3
Super Mario Bros 3
I can see Just Cause 2 and Bioshock 2 joining the listgerudoman320
'Blew Away' are strong words, and I can't really think of any sequels that stomped all over their predecessors, except perhaps Return To Castle Wolfenstein. Some sequels were obviously better looking and more technically proficient, but sometimes fell short in terms of story or longevity. Anyway, some games that I feel were 'better' than their predecessors include:
Half-Life 2
System Shock 2
Aliens vs Predator 2
Age Of Empires II
Return To Castle Wolfenstein
Duke Nukem 3D
Eye Of The Beholder II
Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind
Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II
Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield and Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear
SWAT 3
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory
Ultima Underworld II
Cossacks: The Art Of War
FEAR 2
Gothic II
Heretic II
Max Payne 2
Prince Of Persia: Sands Of TimeAnd the controversial ones:
Fallout 3. Yes, I've played the original Fallout (in fact, I'm replaying it as I'm playing Fallout 3), and I have to be honest, I find Fallout 3 more immersive and engaging. I think the devs really managed to nail the atmosphere, and retain most of the elements of the preceding games.
Quake IV. It didn't do anything really innovative when compared to other FPS games, but I do feel it was a better experience than it's direct sequel Quake 2 (which is the only valid comparison, because it was a continuation of the Stroggos story line, and nothing to do with Quake 3).
RobertBowen
Look, three peoples said that fallout 3 is better.and with you, that would be four dakan. Btw, I have heard from fallout veterans that fallout 3 is a joke compared to previous fallouts.Fallout 3 blew Fallout 2 way way away! :shock:
BeckMall
Log in to comment