It would have to be Rage for me.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Rage,was very sad when I saw how bad the game was,plus the PC version was a horrible port...
BF3 is also on the list,EA made too many dumb decisions that turned me away from buying the game completely(Origin spyware,browser-based menus,switching from PC to console as a main development platform in the middle of production,etc)
I'm more of a RPG player, so it has to be DA2. They got rid of all the stuff that made it a great PC game, and even on console it wasn't all that good. I thought Bioware might fix it up with a lot of patches, but they pretty much abandoned it after release. Sure, they released a few DLC but almostno patches for the base game.
MW3, not much to say, SP was short, game feels too old, and a developer that asks users to upvote their product because its metacritic score was horrible is pathetic. Crysis 2, not because the game was bad, but the incredible lack of patching and support.
Almost no patches? So you didn't see 1.01, 1.02, or 1.03? I went and checked on Impulse, which has patch history, and those three patches fixed a ton of things.I'm more of a RPG player, so it has to be DA2. They got rid of all the stuff that made it a great PC game, and even on console it wasn't all that good. I thought Bioware might fix it up with a lot of patches, but they pretty much abandoned it after release. Sure, they released a few DLC but almostno patches for the base game.
James00715
Rage and Red Faction: Armageddon.
BF 3 is in its current state worse than BC 2, but I still have faint hope it will be fixed.
[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]Just curious. What did you not like about TOR? Surely, you haven't leveled up to 50 already? Although I might believe you since a have friend's guild member that has hit 50 as a Sith Sorc already. :P1.DA2
2. TOR
Elann2008
I come from a background of playing SWG, EVE, and Ultima Online. Those are the only mmo's that could capture my attention. I prefer a sandbox experience--freedom, complexity, custimizability, player created content. TOR just seemed like more of the same kind of themepark MMO that I have seen again and again. My love of star wars wasn't enough to make me love that game. I found completing the missions and listening to the dialog tedious. I wanted to skip through it all.
To put it bluntly: too simplistic.
Its a preference thing. I understand why they made it the way they did--its just not for me, but being a huge fan of Star Wars I was disappointed. It would be my #1 disappointment except for the fact that I found DA2 to be so abysmally bad that it earned my #1 slot.
No I got to level 20 ish I think. I don't need to go further. My problem with it isn't a level thing; its from the ground up.
Just curious. What did you not like about TOR? Surely, you haven't leveled up to 50 already? Although I might believe you since a have friend's guild member that has hit 50 as a Sith Sorc already. :P[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]
1.DA2
2. TOR
Mr_Ditters
I come from a background of playing SWG, EVE, and Ultima Online. Those are the only mmo's that could capture my attention. I prefer a sandbox experience--freedom, complexity, custimizability, player created content. TOR just seemed like more of the same kind of themepark MMO that I have seen again and again. My love of star wars wasn't enough to make me love that game. I found completing the missions and listening to the dialog tedious. I wanted to skip through it all.
To put it bluntly: too simplistic.
Its a preference thing. I understand why they made it the way they did--its just not for me, but being a huge fan of Star Wars I was disappointed. It would be my #1 disappointment except for the fact that I found DA2 to be so abysmally bad that it earned my #1 slot.
No I got to level 20 ish I think. I don't need to go further. My problem with it isn't a level thing; its from the ground up.
Ahhh I see. Sounds very fair. Thank you for the feedback. :)I'd have to say BF3 from what I've heard from my friends. I'm so glad that I didn't fall for their peer pressure. I didn't care for the beta, but they all bought it when they came out, they played it for about a week, but have yet to touch it since.
I'd have to say BF3 from what I've heard from my friends. I'm so glad that I didn't fall for their peer pressure. I didn't care for the beta, but they all bought it when they came out, they played it for about a week, but have yet to touch it since.
Cwagmire21
Story of my life. Bugs overwhelming is pretty much what stopped me from bothering with it.
[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]
I'd have to say BF3 from what I've heard from my friends. I'm so glad that I didn't fall for their peer pressure. I didn't care for the beta, but they all bought it when they came out, they played it for about a week, but have yet to touch it since.
GD1551
Story of my life. Bugs overwhelming is pretty much what stopped me from bothering with it.
I still can't believe I only have 5 hrs in MP, but I've always been a CoD gamer so that could have to do with it...[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]
I'd have to say BF3 from what I've heard from my friends. I'm so glad that I didn't fall for their peer pressure. I didn't care for the beta, but they all bought it when they came out, they played it for about a week, but have yet to touch it since.
GD1551
Story of my life. Bugs overwhelming is pretty much what stopped me from bothering with it.
I was disappointed with BF3 but probably because my expectations were too high.
After playing it some more and thinking about it, I consider it the best online shooter in existence--in spite of its flaws and what it could have been.
Whats better?
[QUOTE="GD1551"]
[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]
I'd have to say BF3 from what I've heard from my friends. I'm so glad that I didn't fall for their peer pressure. I didn't care for the beta, but they all bought it when they came out, they played it for about a week, but have yet to touch it since.
Mr_Ditters
Story of my life. Bugs overwhelming is pretty much what stopped me from bothering with it.
I was disappointed with BF3 but probably because my expectations were too high.
After playing it some more and thinking about it, I consider it the best online shooter in existence--in spite of its flaws and what it could have been.
Whats better?
Call of Duty in "SOME PARTS" Read: some parts.[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"][QUOTE="GD1551"]
Story of my life. Bugs overwhelming is pretty much what stopped me from bothering with it.
FelipeInside
I was disappointed with BF3 but probably because my expectations were too high.
After playing it some more and thinking about it, I consider it the best online shooter in existence--in spite of its flaws and what it could have been.
Whats better?
Call of Duty in "SOME PARTS" Read: some parts.Im not sure what you mean by that. How about some specifics?
Call of Duty in "SOME PARTS" Read: some parts.[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]
I was disappointed with BF3 but probably because my expectations were too high.
After playing it some more and thinking about it, I consider it the best online shooter in existence--in spite of its flaws and what it could have been.
Whats better?
Mr_Ditters
Im not sure what you mean by that. How about some specifics?
Well, I've heard there's lots of technical issues (bugs, hit detection, performance) in BF3. Not saying MW3 doesn't have any but a lot less. But apart from the technical viewpoint, I just find CoD more fun most of the time. (as do many other people). Still, it is VERY hard to compare these two cause they play completely differently.[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"] Call of Duty in "SOME PARTS" Read: some parts.FelipeInside
Im not sure what you mean by that. How about some specifics?
Well, I've heard there's lots of technical issues (bugs, hit detection, performance) in BF3. Not saying MW3 doesn't have any but a lot less. But apart from the technical viewpoint, I just find CoD more fun most of the time. (as do many other people). Still, it is VERY hard to compare these two cause they play completely differently.I have experienced some of the problems with BF3. The game would crash while switching maps. It was fixed with the last update. There are little issues that annoy me. I havent had the issues with hit detection like I had with BC2. The game seems to perform well enough on a ATI 4890 which is a couple of years old ($200 when I bought it July 2009). Even if COD is more polished, I still prefer BF3. I like COD, but I prefer BF3. There is just so much more going on--tanks, jets, choppers, all of the bells and whistles, huge maps.
COD is nice for when you have small chunks of time. You can sit down, play a few rounds and rank up. BF3 is great for when you have hours of free time and can squad up with your friends and win a huge battle.
Ive been playing RO2 lately. That game is a mess but there is something about it. It has a lot of potential even though it was released as a disaster. The modding community could turn that into the best fps alive.
COD fails for the simple reason of kill streaks. Most of the time you're not doing the killing but instead it's a helicoptor 100 feet in the air. It's a good game for consolities who can't aim properly on a gamepad but it's a terrible PC FPS.
COD fails for the simple reason of kill streaks. Most of the time you're not doing the killing but instead it's a helicoptor 100 feet in the air. It's a good game for consolities who can't aim properly on a gamepad but it's a terrible PC FPS.
ShimmerMan
So when you play BF3 in a helicopter, it isn't you either doing the killing?
Oh, that's why there are professional tournaments on PC?
I don't play BF. But I assume in BF it's a player controlling the movement of the helicoptor and not the cpu. MW you simply point and click whilst the cpu rotates around the map, and it's very easy to get kills. Also some of the air support you don't even have to aim.
And also there's tournaments for loads of crappy games. Doesn't really mean anything except those games are popular and score a high amount of viewers.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment