First HD4870 512MB review (google translated)

  • 58 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for RazorGR
RazorGR

1605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 RazorGR
Member since 2005 • 1605 Posts

A little slower than the GTX280 (though it beats it in some tests) for half the price!

LINK

Avatar image for aoshi_shinumori
aoshi_shinumori

791

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 aoshi_shinumori
Member since 2006 • 791 Posts
simply wow...
Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts
Isnt there going to be a HD 4870 1gb version? The memory looks like its holding the HD 4870 back when put against the GTX 280.
Avatar image for IQT786
IQT786

2604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 IQT786
Member since 2005 • 2604 Posts
does it have unlocked shaders
Avatar image for chandlerr_360
chandlerr_360

5078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: -2

#5 chandlerr_360
Member since 2006 • 5078 Posts
Meh. The performance over the HD 4850 does not warrant $100 IMO, not to mention it has a double slot cooler...I know it needs it but I just hate them so much. The card sure is sexy though :P
Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts

Meh. The performance over the HD 4850 does not warrant $100 IMO, not to mention it has a double slot cooler...I know it needs it but I just hate them so much. The card sure is sexy though :Pchandlerr_360

once u start going into 4xAA and 8xAA the diffrence between the 4850 and 4870 becomes alot bigger making it worth it especially at 1920x1200 rez . as for the dual slot cooler thing personally for me thats a good thing the card will run cooler and make less noise doing it there also a good amount ofoverclokcing potentional now :D.

the card is amasing for the priceim defintly going to get one once the 1G version comes out.

Avatar image for matrixian
matrixian

624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 matrixian
Member since 2003 • 624 Posts
Nice, it beats the gtx 260 for a 100$ less. I'm not too surprised though, even the 4850 gave a good challenge to the 260 in several games.
Avatar image for PC_X360
PC_X360

1074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 PC_X360
Member since 2008 • 1074 Posts
But I heard the 4870 will have a single slot cooler. My case is too small for dual-slot cards. And the temperature is unacceptable.100 degree Celsius! Are you kidding me??!
Avatar image for tequilasunriser
tequilasunriser

6379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 tequilasunriser
Member since 2004 • 6379 Posts

the temperature is unacceptable.100 degree Celsius! Are you kidding me??!PC_X360

With updated drivers and support from programs like RivaTuner that won't be so much of an issue as you'll be able to boost your fan speeds. Also, reapplication of thermal compounds, such as Arctic Silver, will help. I'm not worried about it and you shouldn't either. They know what they are releasing.

Avatar image for wklzip
wklzip

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 wklzip
Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts

Very hot in every sense.

Damn it needs a new driver to correct those temps, if the card runs fine even at 100C its probable that it may still work normally at 110C.

Also the higher settings, the bigger its performance difference.

I expect price drops for the GTX260. Gotta love price wars :)

Avatar image for A4Audiguy
A4Audiguy

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 A4Audiguy
Member since 2007 • 218 Posts
Man I cant wait. Ive been waiting for these to come out. I dont know if i'll go Nvidia or Ati, but either way everyone is a winner with the huge price drops
Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts
Im still going to wait. I need to see how the 1Gb version of the 4870 peforms compared to the 4850/4870/4870X2. I expect nvidia to drop prices significantly.
Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts
Im still going to wait. I need to see how the 1Gb version of the 4870 peforms compared to the 4850/4870/4870X2. I expect nvidia to drop prices significantly. Killfox
and hopefully ati well also drop there prices even lowers imigine 4870 for 250$ :D gotta love price wars
Avatar image for JP_Russell
JP_Russell

12893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 JP_Russell
Member since 2005 • 12893 Posts
Wow, that's pretty impressive, particularly for the price. I personally wouldn't get it until some drivers were released that fix that stinkin' fan, though. 79 idle, 97 load? Hoo, boy. I live in Florida, and it's already warm in my house with it being summertime and all. That card would turn my room into hell on earth.
Avatar image for wklzip
wklzip

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 wklzip
Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts

[QUOTE="Killfox"]Im still going to wait. I need to see how the 1Gb version of the 4870 peforms compared to the 4850/4870/4870X2. I expect nvidia to drop prices significantly. johnny27
and hopefully ati well also drop there prices even lowers imigine 4870 for 250$ :D gotta love price wars

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

Avatar image for Domobomb
Domobomb

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Domobomb
Member since 2004 • 1914 Posts

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

wklzip

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

Avatar image for Evz0rz
Evz0rz

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Evz0rz
Member since 2006 • 4624 Posts
[QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

Domobomb

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

Avatar image for chandlerr_360
chandlerr_360

5078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: -2

#18 chandlerr_360
Member since 2006 • 5078 Posts
[QUOTE="Domobomb"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

Evz0rz

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

If the GTX 280 went to $350 ATI would be finished, along with their entire 4800 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

Avatar image for slyr114
slyr114

736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 slyr114
Member since 2004 • 736 Posts

http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/

regualr not translated english version

Avatar image for Domobomb
Domobomb

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Domobomb
Member since 2004 • 1914 Posts
[QUOTE="Evz0rz"][QUOTE="Domobomb"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

chandlerr_360

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

If the GTX 280 went to $350 ATI would be finished, along with their entire 4800 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

I really doubt nVidia could sustain a $350 GTX280 for long.

Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts

[QUOTE="Evz0rz"][QUOTE="Domobomb"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

chandlerr_360

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

If the GTX 280 went to $350 ATI would be finished, along with their entire 4800 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

then ati would counter with the 4870x2 for 300$? alotugh then both nvidia and ati would be losing alot of money.

Avatar image for chandlerr_360
chandlerr_360

5078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: -2

#22 chandlerr_360
Member since 2006 • 5078 Posts
johnny27
[QUOTE="Evz0rz"][QUOTE="Domobomb"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

chandlerr_360

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

If the GTX 280 went to $350 ATI would be finished, along with their entire 4800 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

then ati would counter with the 4870x2 for 300$? alotugh then both nvidia and ati would be losing alot of money.

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

Avatar image for Taiko88
Taiko88

1854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Taiko88
Member since 2004 • 1854 Posts

Isnt there going to be a HD 4870 1gb version? The memory looks like its holding the HD 4870 back when put against the GTX 280.Jamiemydearx3

512mb vs 1gb is unimportant. Games barely if not, use the 512mb of the vram, 1GB is overkill and pointless as it does not anything to the game in terms of fps.

Avatar image for Evz0rz
Evz0rz

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Evz0rz
Member since 2006 • 4624 Posts
[QUOTE="chandlerr_360"][QUOTE="Evz0rz"][QUOTE="Domobomb"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

Domobomb

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

If the GTX 280 went to $350 ATI would be finished, along with their entire 4800 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

I really doubt nVidia could sustain a $350 GTX280 for long.

Hey I can dream :P

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
Well the good thing about the 100C temps are that when we overclock later we will know acceptable temperatures.
Avatar image for wklzip
wklzip

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 wklzip
Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

chandlerr_360

:shock:
What?

Avatar image for deniiiii21
deniiiii21

1261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 deniiiii21
Member since 2007 • 1261 Posts
4870x2 destroys 280GTX and anything Nvidia has, if they launched a 4870x2 for around 400$ it would be game over Nvidia, back to the drawing board.
Avatar image for TicTac8745
TicTac8745

3902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#29 TicTac8745
Member since 2007 • 3902 Posts
[QUOTE="johnny27"]chandlerr_360
[QUOTE="Evz0rz"][QUOTE="Domobomb"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

chandlerr_360

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

If the GTX 280 went to $350 ATI would be finished, along with their entire 4800 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

then ati would counter with the 4870x2 for 300$? alotugh then both nvidia and ati would be losing alot of money.

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

Unless you have some time machine - how do you know that the GTX280 already outperforms a HD4870X2 (R700 I believe)? The card (4870 X2) hasn't even been released yet.

Avatar image for PC_X360
PC_X360

1074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 PC_X360
Member since 2008 • 1074 Posts
[QUOTE="chandlerr_360"][QUOTE="johnny27"]TicTac8745
[QUOTE="Evz0rz"][QUOTE="Domobomb"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

chandlerr_360

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

If the GTX 280 went to $350 ATI would be finished, along with their entire 4800 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

then ati would counter with the 4870x2 for 300$? alotugh then both nvidia and ati would be losing alot of money.

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

Unless you have some time machine - how do you know that the GTX280 already outperforms a HD4870X2 (R700 I believe)? The card (4870 X2) hasn't even been released yet.

[/QUOTEWhere is the 4870X2??
Avatar image for TicTac8745
TicTac8745

3902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#31 TicTac8745
Member since 2007 • 3902 Posts
[QUOTE="TicTac8745"][QUOTE="chandlerr_360"][QUOTE="johnny27"]PC_X360
[QUOTE="Evz0rz"][QUOTE="Domobomb"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

chandlerr_360

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

If the GTX 280 went to $350 ATI would be finished, along with their entire 4800 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

then ati would counter with the 4870x2 for 300$? alotugh then both nvidia and ati would be losing alot of money.

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

Unless you have some time machine - how do you know that the GTX280 already outperforms a HD4870X2 (R700 I believe)? The card (4870 X2) hasn't even been released yet.

Where is the 4870X2??

We don't know it's final name yet, it's been speculated to be named 4870 X2, but the codename is R700 and it is another dual GPU on one PCB setup like the 3870 X2 (hence why some would call it 4870 X2)

Search R700 on Google, you might find some preview articles - I believe the card is coming sometime in July. (Hope LordEC will jump into this thread, If I said something wrong, I believe he would smack the living daylights out of me :P )

Avatar image for Wesker776
Wesker776

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Wesker776
Member since 2005 • 7004 Posts

If the GTX 280 went to $350 NVIDIA would be finished, along with their entire 200 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

chandlerr_360

Fixed that quote for you. ;)

Avatar image for Wesker776
Wesker776

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Wesker776
Member since 2005 • 7004 Posts

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

chandlerr_360

Right, a single HD4870 is roughly 10-20% slower than GTX 280 (the gap closes when 8xMSAA is used), so obviously two RV770 will be slower than a GTX 280! :roll: Also, I love the fact that you have a review sample of the HD4870 X2, but you're not willing to share your benchmarks. :roll:

Avatar image for Wesker776
Wesker776

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Wesker776
Member since 2005 • 7004 Posts

As for R700, I think most of you will be surprised at how well it scales with two RV770 chips.

If anyone has been paying attention to the RV770 architecture diagram, you'll notice a thing called a "CrossFire Sideport" connected to the "Hub":

(Yes it's a s*** diagram, but it's the only decent one I could find)

Anandtech reports that this on-die port is disabled on the RV770 chips powering the HD4850 and HD4870. They further go on and say that on DAAMiT's upcoming R700 product, the port will be utlised to help increase communication between the two RV770 chips (apart from the speculated PLX PCIE 2.0 bridge chip).

I'm not saying that this will definitely make R700 much more superior to HD4870 CrossFire (in fact, I believe R700 and RV770 CrossFire will be tied), but keep in mind that RV770 in its XT (HD4870) form consumes quite a lot of power. DAAMiT's alternative strategy to achieve 'HD4870 CrossFire like performance' on R700 would probably be to clock both RV770 chips at 625MHz (HD4850 speeds) and increase dual-GPU communication (either by more bandwidth or lower latency via the "CrossFire Sideport").

R700 will of course be fitted with GDDR5 memory--whether or not each GPU will share the same memory buffer, or each be paired with 512MB or each be paired with 1GB, remains to be unforeseen however.

Avatar image for chandlerr_360
chandlerr_360

5078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: -2

#35 chandlerr_360
Member since 2006 • 5078 Posts
[QUOTE="chandlerr_360"]

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

Wesker776

Right, a single HD4870 is roughly 10-20% slower than GTX 280 (the gap closes when 8xMSAA is used), so obviously two RV770 will be slower than a GTX 280! :roll: Also, I love the fact that you have a review sample of the HD4870 X2, but you're not willing to share your benchmarks. :roll:

Trust me, the GTX 280 will be outperforming the HD 4870x2 (when it comes out in early August).

Avatar image for rik666
rik666

488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 rik666
Member since 2005 • 488 Posts
[QUOTE="Evz0rz"][QUOTE="Domobomb"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

chandlerr_360

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

If the GTX 280 went to $350 ATI would be finished, along with their entire 4800 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

Wtf?

That's wrong, NVIDIA. would be finished, The 4870 (and x2) are equal, or better cards.

Avatar image for RazorGR
RazorGR

1605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 RazorGR
Member since 2005 • 1605 Posts
[QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="chandlerr_360"]

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

chandlerr_360

Right, a single HD4870 is roughly 10-20% slower than GTX 280 (the gap closes when 8xMSAA is used), so obviously two RV770 will be slower than a GTX 280! :roll: Also, I love the fact that you have a review sample of the HD4870 X2, but you're not willing to share your benchmarks. :roll:

Trust me, the GTX 280 will be outperforming the HD 4870x2 (when it comes out in early August).

Show us your benchmarks please!

Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts
[QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="chandlerr_360"]

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

chandlerr_360

Right, a single HD4870 is roughly 10-20% slower than GTX 280 (the gap closes when 8xMSAA is used), so obviously two RV770 will be slower than a GTX 280! :roll: Also, I love the fact that you have a review sample of the HD4870 X2, but you're not willing to share your benchmarks. :roll:

Trust me, the GTX 280 will be outperforming the HD 4870x2 (when it comes out in early August).

So far unofficial benchmarks that were made in 3d mark vantage at computex show exactly opposite, which is expected.

Avatar image for Wesker776
Wesker776

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Wesker776
Member since 2005 • 7004 Posts
[QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="chandlerr_360"]

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

chandlerr_360

Right, a single HD4870 is roughly 10-20% slower than GTX 280 (the gap closes when 8xMSAA is used), so obviously two RV770 will be slower than a GTX 280! :roll: Also, I love the fact that you have a review sample of the HD4870 X2, but you're not willing to share your benchmarks. :roll:

Trust me, the GTX 280 will be outperforming the HD 4870x2 (when it comes out in early August).

I think it's time you moved out of your arse, and into the real world.

Take a look at HD4870's in CrossFire (keep in mind that benchmarks are a 2560x1600 with 4xAA/16xAF enabled--all with only a 512MB memory buffer for the HD4870's):

Source: http://techreport.com/articles.x/14990/1

Yeah, that GTX 280 will really smack that HD4870 X2 alright! :roll:

Avatar image for hargZer0
hargZer0

96

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 hargZer0
Member since 2006 • 96 Posts
[QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="chandlerr_360"]

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

chandlerr_360

Right, a single HD4870 is roughly 10-20% slower than GTX 280 (the gap closes when 8xMSAA is used), so obviously two RV770 will be slower than a GTX 280! :roll: Also, I love the fact that you have a review sample of the HD4870 X2, but you're not willing to share your benchmarks. :roll:

Trust me, the GTX 280 will be outperforming the HD 4870x2 (when it comes out in early August).

This is possible but it will depend on the specs of the GT200's once they have gone through the 55nm die shrink. People on Gurur3d have got their 65nm GTX280's running with the core at 730mhz so the 55nm versions should be as high or higher than that at stock.

Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts
[QUOTE="chandlerr_360"][QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="chandlerr_360"]

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

Wesker776

Right, a single HD4870 is roughly 10-20% slower than GTX 280 (the gap closes when 8xMSAA is used), so obviously two RV770 will be slower than a GTX 280! :roll: Also, I love the fact that you have a review sample of the HD4870 X2, but you're not willing to share your benchmarks. :roll:

Trust me, the GTX 280 will be outperforming the HD 4870x2 (when it comes out in early August).

I think it's time you moved out of your arse, and into the real world.

Take a look at HD4870's in CrossFire (keep in mind that benchmarks are a 2560x1600 with 4xAA/16xAF enabled--all with only a 512MB memory buffer for the HD4870's):

Source: http://techreport.com/articles.x/14990/1

Yeah, that GTX 280 will really smack that HD4870 X2 alright! :roll:

:lol: HD 4870 beats out the GTX 280 alone in some of those benchmarks.

AND WHY DOES CRYSIS+ATI=FAIL?

Avatar image for Luminouslight
Luminouslight

6397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Luminouslight
Member since 2007 • 6397 Posts
[QUOTE="johnny27"]chandlerr_360
[QUOTE="Evz0rz"][QUOTE="Domobomb"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

imagine 4870 for $249 nvidia counters with gtx260 OCed for $249... that would be damn nice! :D

chandlerr_360

That wouldn't be much of a counter would it?

No but a GTX280 at $350 sure as hell would

If the GTX 280 went to $350 ATI would be finished, along with their entire 4800 line. Good thing that won't happen :)

then ati would counter with the 4870x2 for 300$? alotugh then both nvidia and ati would be losing alot of money.

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

I would disagree, currently, crossfire 4870's currently beat one GTX280 quite sufficiently.

Avatar image for chandlerr_360
chandlerr_360

5078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: -2

#43 chandlerr_360
Member since 2006 • 5078 Posts
[QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="chandlerr_360"][QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="chandlerr_360"]

Too bad the GTX 280 outperforms the 4870X2.

Jamiemydearx3

Right, a single HD4870 is roughly 10-20% slower than GTX 280 (the gap closes when 8xMSAA is used), so obviously two RV770 will be slower than a GTX 280! :roll: Also, I love the fact that you have a review sample of the HD4870 X2, but you're not willing to share your benchmarks. :roll:

Trust me, the GTX 280 will be outperforming the HD 4870x2 (when it comes out in early August).

I think it's time you moved out of your arse, and into the real world.

Take a look at HD4870's in CrossFire (keep in mind that benchmarks are a 2560x1600 with 4xAA/16xAF enabled--all with only a 512MB memory buffer for the HD4870's):

Source: http://techreport.com/articles.x/14990/1

Yeah, that GTX 280 will really smack that HD4870 X2 alright! :roll:

:lol: HD 4870 beats out the GTX 280 alone in some of those benchmarks.

AND WHY DOES CRYSIS+ATI=FAIL?

Exactly, that is BS. Those benchies are not even legit, plus they are using a GTX 280 without updated drivers. Nividia is releasing refined drivers for the GTX 280 before the release of the HD 4870x2 in August, and it WILL outperform it, you will see.

Avatar image for Domobomb
Domobomb

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Domobomb
Member since 2004 • 1914 Posts

Exactly, that is BS. Those benchies are not even legit, plus they are using a GTX 280 without updated drivers. Nividia is releasing refined drivers for the GTX 280 before the release of the HD 4870x2 in August, and it WILL outperform it, you will see.

chandlerr_360

You should also note ATI's drivers still need time to mature, and the 4870 isn't even out yet! Or should be out today?

Avatar image for chandlerr_360
chandlerr_360

5078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: -2

#45 chandlerr_360
Member since 2006 • 5078 Posts
[QUOTE="chandlerr_360"]

Exactly, that is BS. Those benchies are not even legit, plus they are using a GTX 280 without updated drivers. Nividia is releasing refined drivers for the GTX 280 before the release of the HD 4870x2 in August, and it WILL outperform it, you will see.

Domobomb

You should also note ATI's drivers still need time to mature, and the 4870 isn't even out yet! Or should be out today?

I'm in the Nvidia PartnerForce program and the GTX 200 series is actually getting drivers that will significantly be boosting their performance in late July. ATI's drivers on the other hand will most likely only be fixing the fan speed and power adjustment problems with the new cards. It is also imporant to remember that 2 HD 4870's in crossfire will be more powerful than a single HD 4870x2, simply because of power requirments and shared GPU limits.

As for the HD 4870 release date, isn't it Monday? I am not sure but I thought it was Monday...

Avatar image for Wesker776
Wesker776

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Wesker776
Member since 2005 • 7004 Posts

AND WHY DOES CRYSIS+ATI=FAIL?

Jamiemydearx3

Because Crysis + Nvidia = $$$ for Crytek. ;)

Exactly, that is BS. Those benchies are not even legit, plus they are using a GTX 280 without updated drivers. Nividia is releasing refined drivers for the GTX 280 before the release of the HD 4870x2 in August, and it WILL outperform it, you will see.

chandlerr_360

Holy crap, you're 110% fanboy alright. -_-

You have the bollocks to call out bulls*** on The Tech Report, one of the best editorials on the net, yet you post back with nothing but blubbery fanboy rubbish?

My lord, this is a waste of my time--good day to you, sir. Have fun gaming on your 8600 GTS. ;)

Avatar image for chandlerr_360
chandlerr_360

5078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: -2

#47 chandlerr_360
Member since 2006 • 5078 Posts
[QUOTE="Jamiemydearx3"]

AND WHY DOES CRYSIS+ATI=FAIL?

Wesker776

Because Crysis + Nvidia = $$$ for Crytek. ;)

Exactly, that is BS. Those benchies are not even legit, plus they are using a GTX 280 without updated drivers. Nividia is releasing refined drivers for the GTX 280 before the release of the HD 4870x2 in August, and it WILL outperform it, you will see.

chandlerr_360

Holy crap, you're 110% fanboy alright. -_-

You have the bollocks to call out bulls*** on The Tech Report, one of the best editorials on the net, yet you post back with nothing but blubbery fanboy rubbish?

My lord, this is a waste of my time--good day to you, sir. Have fun gaming on your 8600 GTS. ;)

I have two systems running ATI cards, both a HD 3850 and a HD 4850, but facts are facts. Like I said, I sell Nvidia products and know a little bit more about them than you might.

Avatar image for wklzip
wklzip

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 wklzip
Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts

I have two systems running ATI cards, both a HD 3850 and a HD 4850, but facts are facts. Like I said, I sell Nvidia products and know a little bit more about them than you might.

chandlerr_360

:lol:


Sry, but i can bet that Wesker knows a lot more about hardware than you.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="Jamiemydearx3"]

AND WHY DOES CRYSIS+ATI=FAIL?

chandlerr_360

Because Crysis + Nvidia = $$$ for Crytek. ;)

Exactly, that is BS. Those benchies are not even legit, plus they are using a GTX 280 without updated drivers. Nividia is releasing refined drivers for the GTX 280 before the release of the HD 4870x2 in August, and it WILL outperform it, you will see.

chandlerr_360

Holy crap, you're 110% fanboy alright. -_-

You have the bollocks to call out bulls*** on The Tech Report, one of the best editorials on the net, yet you post back with nothing but blubbery fanboy rubbish?

My lord, this is a waste of my time--good day to you, sir. Have fun gaming on your 8600 GTS. ;)

I have two systems running ATI cards, both a HD 3850 and a HD 4850, but facts are facts. Like I said, I sell Nvidia products and know a little bit more about them than you might.

So you work at Bestbuy? You said you sell nvidia cards.

Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts

So you work at Bestbuy? You said you sell nvidia cards.

CreasianDevaili

lmao