What should I get first? Ill eventually get both, but what first?
Tell me some +/- (Good Points /Bad Points)
!!!Without any spoilers please!!!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
What should I get first? Ill eventually get both, but what first?
Tell me some +/- (Good Points /Bad Points)
!!!Without any spoilers please!!!
Well I have been playing Bioshock for about 6 hours now. and its pimptastic... if you enjoyed System shock 2 then you will enjoy BioShock... I know I'm enjoying it... My stupid job is preventing me from playing it right now but that won't stop me from reading about it...
This is absolutely no contest. BioShock has already dethroned Ocarina of Time as the highest scoring game ever on gamerankings.com (let's hope it keeps the 99% as more reviews come in) and has already been "locked in" for Game of The Year by several magazines and sites, because they simply can't see anything else this year being better. Everybody is calling it the best thing since sliced bread, while everybody is also calling Quake Wars a low quality Battlefield knockoff.
Do your part and tell game publishers that we want more original masterpieces, not me-too clones of lowest common denominator games.
The QW beta sucked, to put it nicely.DGFreak
Lol Ouch.
Thanks a bundle guys im gonna get BioShock for sure then.
Also E3BigC I have 2142, TY for the recommendation though.
Iv been playing 2142 to hold me off till I got one of these... I got GRAW 2 but it doesnt work YAY UBISOFT BUG TEAM!
No Online at all? Bummer, but oh well.
Anyway. Thanks again.
PS: ET got owned Via votes.
I choose Bioshock more than quake wars because Bioshock has elements that makes this game a great FPS, and the idea of the plasmids is amazing, but most of all the story is more interesting. Quake wars is a game that is designed for Online battles, dont get me wrong I like Quake wars but ,Bioshock is better.
[QUOTE="19chevelle72"]neither games are out, so lets just make up random crap to make a judgementbblundell
I'm not making up random crap.....read posts before you make yourself look foolish....I've played ETQW GG noob
You've played the BETAS, the same betas as the rest of us. SAY it one more time BETA. but since you've played Quake1 through 6 your an expert at telling how a game will turn out, even though its a beta and things sometimes change. And as far as Bioshock is concerned its not OUT yet. It could totaly suck for all we know. PROBLY NOT but again its not out. So here it comes again:
neither games are out, so lets just make up random crap to make a judgement
My post wasn't directed at you, but since you talk out the side of you head, might as well shut u up.
I haven't played Bioshock at all and I know little about it (I hate getting into hype...) but I've played enough Quake Wars to know that it's going to be fun forever where as I'll beat Bioshock after I get it and probably never play it again.
Multiplayer = unlimited replay value.
I played that beta 2 of Enemy Territorys:QW and I have to say its alot like the free version of Enemy Territorys (WWII). Fast paced run around shooting people, type of game. They TRIED to make it tactical by allowing you to lean around walls or go prone, but no one every uses that because its 100% pointless. You move way to quick (out run a tank) and it just ruins a majority of the games highlights. Also there are very few vehicles and they seemed to be dumbed down so anyone can use them. Swiftstrike5
You've played one map...
The map dictates the tactics and valley lacks any CQB...
And it's great that there's few vehicles because the battlefield series is HORRIBLE because of its vehicles. It's a first person shooter, not a first person driver.
[QUOTE="bblundell"][QUOTE="19chevelle72"]neither games are out, so lets just make up random crap to make a judgement19chevelle72
I'm not making up random crap.....read posts before you make yourself look foolish....I've played ETQW GG noob
You've played the BETAS, the same betas as the rest of us. SAY it one more time BETA. but since you've played Quake1 through 6 your an expert at telling how a game will turn out, even though its a beta and things sometimes change. And as far as Bioshock is concerned its not OUT yet. It could totaly suck for all we know. PROBLY NOT but again its not out. So here it comes again:
neither games are out, so lets just make up random crap to make a judgement
My post wasn't directed at you, but since you talk out the side of you head, might as well shut u up.
Are you so gullible to actually believe that ETQW is going to stray far from what the beta is now? The beta is garbage, it offers nothing morethan Battlefield in a Quake setting. The fireteams don't even add any type of helpfor the gameeither. WTF did I ever say I was an expert? I said I wasn't going to make a decision on Bioshock because I haven't played the demo/isn't out yet. Your post doesn't seem to make that much sense considering your babbling on about fake information about me being an expert....(still trying ot figure that sh*t out).
I haven't played Bioshock at all and I know little about it (I hate getting into hype...) but I've played enough Quake Wars to know that it's going to be fun forever where as I'll beat Bioshock after I get it and probably never play it again.
Multiplayer = unlimited replay value.
D9-THC
Apparently IGN, Eurogamer, 1Up, GameSpy, PCGamer, GamePro and PCZone and everybody else who has actually played the game disagrees with you. There has not been a single review yet that says BioShock won't take atleast 25 hours of your time, plus the inevitable second and third and so on replays through it. Add the modding community to the mix, and we have ourselves quite a lot of potential gameplay time. I doubt there's going to be much to Quake Wars that we haven't already seen a billion times in better games.
According to the reviews, BioShock has tied with or outright dethroned Ocarina of Time as the highest scoring game of all time. That's pretty serious; a multi-million copy selling game that became the poster child of Nintendo and video gaming in general and is constantly at the top of #1 best game ever charts is now being gravely threatened by BioShock. Let that sink in for a moment. Quake Wars has no ****ing chance and I will laugh at you even more than I am now if you try justifying QW over the highest scoring game of all time.
Multiplayer = unlimited replay value.
D9-THC
I Agree. LikeRTCW:ET people add mods, maps, etc. to it... so in the long run itl last longer. Im bored of 2142 I need a multiplayer FPSexperience.
Ill eventually get ET but BioShock first.
Lol outrun a tank? Thats kinda not cool.
Quake wars is a game I would stay away from. BF2142 is much better in gameplay pacing and just in general. Go with Bioshock and then probably in the future with Crysis or Frontlines Fuel of War if that turns out to be good for you multiplayer fps.splintercell989
I hope theyput outa demo after the game's release. That would be awsome.
Mmmm Crysis....
From the demo, Bioshock is a good game but so far it seems like people are blowing it way out of proportion. It's good, but not that good.-Unreal-
Luckily for us, game reviewers are smart enough to review the entire game instead of just basing their opinion on a 15-30 minute demo.
I'd say get Bioshock.
I'm in the Quake Wars beta also and though I like it (I'm not a Quake fan so I'm not holding it up against other Quake games) I feel the Bioshock demo I played on my 360 was better.
At this point in the ETQW beta they need work on vehicle control. Otherwise it plays similar to BF2 but without commanders and it is objective based. I didn't like BF2142 so I cannot compare.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment