[QUOTE="lordreaven"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"] It makes me feel like I'm in a war, it's a shame it doesn't do the same for you. Your loss I guess. War isn't always about tactical and slow strategy like ArmA, it's at time hectic where you don't know what's happening. FelipeInsideI'm not even talking about game play, for if it were game play RO2, and Planetside 2 (2 different shooters in style AND game play) do a better job game play wise. I am referring to the art. BF3 looks bad due to the saturation and extreme bloom. ARMA 2 is brighter and more colourful. Is that not sad that a Mil sim that focuses more on gameplay to make it a sim also smacks around an arcade shooter with Graphics in mind? To make it worse ARMA 2 is older. I guess it depends on taste like always. To me BF3 looks better than ArmA2. It does sometimes have too much bloom etc, but I don't let that stop me enjoying the game....which seems to be what other people here do.
Arma 2 doesn't look as undersaturated and blueish gray like BF3.
I don't tihnk BF3 grpahics are bad, I just think they could have been a lot better. The water doesn't look like water and the fires don't look like actual fire.
it looks washed out and bland and I personally hate that. At least what they could do is add a saturation slider like Rockstar does in Red Dead and GTA 4.
Log in to comment