Call of Duty: WWII

Avatar image for kualx
Kualx

20

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1 Kualx
Member since 2017 • 20 Posts

World War 2 baby! COD is going back to its roots this year. What do you all think about that?

Avatar image for urbangamez
urbangamez

3511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By urbangamez
Member since 2010 • 3511 Posts

good idea ww 2 with modern graphics should be outstanding and lots of material exists for a great storyline for a sp campaign, plenty of famous battles for a mp campaign now they just have to execute

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

I just hope it won't become another MW game or as World at War ended up.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

58305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#4 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 58305 Posts

Very underwhelmed.

They could make 100 more CoD games before returning to WWII and it would still be too soon. The era is tapped out from a basic FPS perspective; unless they do something innovative, or change the story up (either with an alt-history thing like Man in the High Castle, or some really unheard of perspective or story), I won't be impressed.

But I will probably buy it all the same against my better judgement. I enjoyed Infinite Warfare enough.

Avatar image for madrocketeer
madrocketeer

10589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -6

User Lists: 0

#5 madrocketeer
Member since 2005 • 10589 Posts

Er, it's a COD game? If that means yet another 5 1/2 hour corridor-linear scripted-to-death campaign, gimmicky multiplayer and worn-out zombie mode package, I'm not interested.

Avatar image for relytgaming
RelytGaming

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6 RelytGaming
Member since 2017 • 8 Posts

I really don't know about all this, COD seems dead but if there is any way to revitalize the franchise this could be it!

Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

ill be getting it :)

Avatar image for Mickeyminime
Mickeyminime

1581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#8 Mickeyminime
Member since 2008 • 1581 Posts

I'm going to pass like i did with all the others

I only ever owned MW 1,2,3, BO and W@W.

BO killed it and i stopped buying them ever since. I only got MW3 because i liked the MW series. Not to mention, COD comes out every year. Its not worth the cash for a very short game

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

@Mickeyminime said:

I'm going to pass like i did with all the others

I only ever owned MW 1,2,3, BO and W@W.

BO killed it and i stopped buying them ever since. I only got MW3 because i liked the MW series. Not to mention, COD comes out every year. Its not worth the cash for a very short game

Black Ops 2 was one of the best so you missed out there.

As for the topic, I've always had fun with COD games but problem on PC is that the population is always low these days so hard to find a match a few months after launch.

Hopefully this new one gets PC gamers back into it.

Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#10 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11511 Posts

I dont care what skin they put on it, it'll still be the same boring gameplay

Avatar image for vrex7
VRex7

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 VRex7
Member since 2017 • 49 Posts

I'm not mad at it. I'm glad Sledgehammer is finally taking it back, as an OG player that bit is exciting for me and I really hope they deliver on the narrative. I always want to give COD the benefit of the doubt because it WAS a great game to start so I hope this release will live up to the promises.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

I heard this one was going to have 48 players maps and also vehicles maybe ?

Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#13  Edited By with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11511 Posts

@FelipeInside said:

I heard this one was going to have 48 players maps and also vehicles maybe ?

jesus, if true they are being pretty transparent in their attempt to ape battlefield

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

@FelipeInside said:
@Mickeyminime said:

I'm going to pass like i did with all the others

I only ever owned MW 1,2,3, BO and W@W.

BO killed it and i stopped buying them ever since. I only got MW3 because i liked the MW series. Not to mention, COD comes out every year. Its not worth the cash for a very short game

Black Ops 2 was one of the best so you missed out there.

As for the topic, I've always had fun with COD games but problem on PC is that the population is always low these days so hard to find a match a few months after launch.

Hopefully this new one gets PC gamers back into it.

You'll never see high populations like the old days of CoD1,CoDUO, CoD2, CoD4, and WaW. As long they keep giving PC gamers the shaft every year. At least dedicated servers and a server browser would be nice.

And like isn't like the game now is only a boring 12-16 players in a match?

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

@with_teeth26 said:
@FelipeInside said:

I heard this one was going to have 48 players maps and also vehicles maybe ?

jesus, if true they are being pretty transparent in their attempt to ape battlefield

It seems they are taking a bit from everywhere. So far from different articles I've read:

- 48 player maps (some, not all)

- Destructible environments (probably not as much as BF)

- Vehicles (rumoured because when you choose a squad, you have to choose a class like Airborne or Infantry etc)

- A social place like the Tower on Destiny

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

17808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 225

User Lists: 0

#16 BassMan
Member since 2002 • 17808 Posts

Hard to get excited for another WWII FPS (especially COD). Even though there have not been many WWII FPS over recent years, WWII has been played out in both games and films. Not that epic anymore. I am more interested in the unique character stories about WWII than the huge war itself.