Benchmark Thread V. 3

I'll update thread tomorrow. I'm glad to see people still posting new scores :D

I've had mobos that came with SLI bridges and also last 2 EVGA 780 TI's I purchased came with SLI bridges in the states.

@GoldenElementXL: Lol at all the SLI bidges that come with the RVE!

Single card run. 4770K @ 4.4GHz, 4X4GB @ 1866mhz, R9 290 @ 1142 / 1500 - Firestrike - 10904

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3686524

I tested my old non-gaming PC from 2011 just for fun. That crap was probably $550 or so when I got it... and to think I tried to play Witcher 2 on it. lol

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3660652

453 with AMD Radeon HD 6530D(1x) and AMD A6-3600

my msi 7870 came with a bridge

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3755459

9734 firestrike with my GTX970 which replaced my 7970. Nothing overclocked.

-Sky Diver-
Another little update: 4770K @ 4.4GHz, X2 R9 290's @ 1100 / 1400
Score - 37640
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5381094

Ran again and turned off antivirus. Apparantly thats worth 100 points or so. 9842 with my i7 4770k and gtx970 strix. all at stock

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5469383?

All updated

I've added Fire Strike Ultra benchmark. (it's in post #9)

I want to see how all you guys with the 900 series do with 4k.

Fire Strike Ultra - 4770K @ 4.4GHz, 1866mhz RAM, X2 R9 290's @ 1100 / 1400
Score - 4981
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5478615

@insane_metalist: W00t, more please people!!

You should also add Extreme Fire Strike and Extreme 3DMark11 to the list.
Also, if it's not hard for you to edit. My Ultra run was @ 1100 / 1400

Holy hell my rig isn't ready for 4K by any means...... Better throw more money at it.

Fire Strike Ultra - 5027 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5486299?

Weak ass Titans Blacks.............

@klunt_bumskrint: my 19000 breaking fire strike wasn't updated.

@GoldenElementXL: Updated but I need your CPU/GPU clocks. Also redo your catzilla bench.

Just posted a new Catzilla score and added 1500 points to my Sky Diver score :D

@klunt_bumskrint: CPU 4.2 GPU stock.

Put a small OC on my card. :P I know it can reach much higher clocks

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3780052

I finally broke 10K! Going to continue playing with the cpu in the next couple of days.

FireMark: 10281

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3799406

@Legend002: Are you clocks in 3dMark correct?

@klunt_bumskrint:

That would be correct.

Tiny update: another single card run, managed to squeeze a tiny bit more out of my main R9 290 - 4770K @ 4.4GHz, 1866mhz, R9 290 @ 1143 / 1500
Firestrike Score - 10934
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5603034

OK new result by adding my second Asus Strix GTX970. Went from 9842->15114

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5647926?

Updated your score.

Added this one to the list.

Took the 4K Firestrike test with my single GTX 680.. Which only has 2GB... And got a whopping 1061 points. This is at stock clocks for this card... 1137/1500. I might see if I can break the 1100 points wall :P

My Score 3dMark

Pretty happy with my physics score (14,300)! Not bad for a 5 year old motherboard and a CPU that cost me $90 shipped :)

GioVela Catzilla 720p = 24443

The CPU is newer right? Anyway it is a 6 core one, 12 threads, running at 3.8. Sure today's modern CPU might be running another Ghz higher, but clock for it is not that big difference. And most people on this board uses 4 cores CPU. 3DMark is one benchmark where you see benefit of having extra cores.

I'll update tomorrow as I am heading of to bed now. 1am here.

It's a 5 year old CPU too. Was like $1500 brand new (server CPU).

But now the warrantiy periods are ending so big companies are upgrading servers again. (And the used cpu's are showing up on eBay)

Most people are easily getting 4.4Ghz out of them. The enthusiast overclockers get 4.7Ghz out of them.

And I'm not sure why the benchmark doesn't show, but Turbo Mode adds another 2 multipliers on all 6 cores. I. So with Turbo it's 4.14Ghz

@horgen: I just ran the same test for 4k. Firestrike Ultra, I was inspired by all the GTX970 memory talk. I got 4747.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5737496?

And for that simple reason please post proof of actual CPU speed and or GPU clocks if 3Dmark doesn't get them right.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3966164

10,257

I suppose thats better than the previous.

Been trying to see what the max is for this card.

No picture, but I can can post one showing the clocks if needed

+95 on the core put me at 1449

+240 on the mem 7492

_____________
Edited myself in. :P Looking at the leaderboards, might be possible to pass the 7990 person above me
Depending on how good this cards memory is, I could probably squeeze another +200 out of it.

New High for me

11,190 3DMark

Catzilla

Catzilla 1.3 25122

Sky Diver 28,955

Cloud Gate 31624

Updated

@horgen:

Pretty good single GPU ranking :)

Yeah. You are beaten by a single 780Ti though...

No one with GTX 980 on here?

Well I couldn't resist to do some benchies too:

Firestrike: 10026 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5784723 - 4770K(3,7) - GTX970(1178/1753) - 2133 RAM

Skydiver: 27036 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5784659 - 4770K(3,7) - GTX970(1178/1753) - 2133 RAM

Cloudgate: 26188 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5784584 - 4770K(3,7) - GTX970(1178/1753) - 2133 RAM

Thank you for posting it like this. Sadly I do not have the time to update it now, but I'll do so tomorrow. :)

You welcome.

No worries, I will wait as long as it takes. :)

List updated!

Soon we will have to clean out old scores.

New High for me lol

11,444

The GPU overclock was 1463mhz and 7750 Memory

Results not found =/

oops, topped it anyway

11,610 Firestrike

33414 Cloud Gate

16,643 Physics score, not bad for a CPU that cost me $100 shipped.

Only the 8 cores, and the 5Ghz 5930K has a higher physics score on our list.

@GioVela2010: You're so very close to my 680 SLI score!