This topic is locked from further discussion.
If only I had just went out and had a bunch of babies it wouldn't have taken over 4 years to get a permanent resident card for the states. It's almost like they don't want skilled workers moving there.
That seems like a poor defense for breaking into something though,If only I had just went out and had a bunch of babies it wouldn't have taken over 4 years to get a permanent resident card for the states. It's almost like they don't want skilled workers moving there.
slimjimbadboy
SHOOT ILLEGALS ON SIGHT
Â
AS FOR THOSE BEING LEGAL, THERE ARE ALREADY PROCESSES YOU'D NEED TO GO THROUGH, PASS THAT, AND BAM, U.S CITIZEN
[QUOTE="slimjimbadboy"]That seems like a poor defense for breaking into something though,If only I had just went out and had a bunch of babies it wouldn't have taken over 4 years to get a permanent resident card for the states. It's almost like they don't want skilled workers moving there.
Canon-Gatorade
Not going to lie, I didn't read the OP. Just wanted to point out that it's much harder for legitimate cases to enter and live in the states as oppose to doing illegally. I lived in the states under school/work visas prior to the green card if that's what you were referring to in quote.
Shooting illegal immagrants on site would probably do something. It would be terribly inhumane and awful, but it would help control illegal immagration.
What ever we do, we should not allow anyone here illegally to have a pathway to citizenship one way or the other without them leaving. The Us granted "amnesty" to illegals years ago and it just sent a message to those here now that if they break our laws by entering the country without going through the proper channels, nothing will happen to them and they will eventually get to be US citizens. Well, that is BS and if they cannot come here properly, then they do not deserve citizenship no matter why they are here.WhiteKnight77What about the ones that are illegal that have been here for years? I am in the minority here, but I think those who come out admitting they are illegal, like there was a CNN thing where they came out because they want there parents and think they should be legal citizens because they are like 14-16 years old illegal in the country, I think all those should be kicked out. You have been taking away resources for years, and you want relatives of yours to be instant citizens because of it?
[QUOTE="Scissorman88"]shooting an illegal = murder How about the shooting the lawbreakers as they run around the fence at legal border crossings (yeah, they do this too)? I am also for planting mine fields across the southern border, 300 yards deep. Some would be pressure mines, others would be pressure release mines.SHOOT ILLEGALS ON SIGHT
Â
AS FOR THOSE BEING LEGAL, THERE ARE ALREADY PROCESSES YOU'D NEED TO GO THROUGH, PASS THAT, AND BAM, U.S CITIZEN
NEWMAHAY
Either way, we shouldn't give out blanket amnesty. It sets an extremely bad precedent and it's immoral. We can't reward criminal behavior, and we can't punish those who weren't responsible for their parents actions.
We can't punish those who weren't responsible for their pareants actions? So like that CNN thing, if they have been in the country illegally for years, and come out wanting to gain citizen ship immediately and asking for their parents as well, we should just give it to them? I may be in the minority but that does not make any sense to me, not only because those kids who are now teenagers plus were snuck in, but they have been occupying space and contributing to the consumtion of resources legal citizens should have the right to get and more. Yes they should be punished of they don't come out and state it when they are ABLE to asap. If you are in a situation where you can be honest, and you don't, that makes no sense at any logical angle.Either way, we shouldn't give out blanket amnesty. It sets an extremely bad precedent and it's immoral. We can't reward criminal behavior, and we can't punish those who weren't responsible for their parents actions.
airshocker
We can't punish those who weren't responsible for their pareants actions? So like that CNN thing, if they have been in the country illegally for years, and come out wanting to gain citizen ship immediately and asking for their parents as well, we should just give it to them? I may be in the minority but that does not make any sense to me, not only because those kids who are now teenagers plus were snuck in, but they have been occupying space and contributing to the consumtion of resources legal citizens should have the right to get and more. Yes they should be punished of they don't come out and state it when they are ABLE to asap. If you are in a situation where you can be honest, and you don't, that makes no sense at any logical angle.Canon-Gatorade
I fail to see how you got any of that from my statement.
[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]What ever we do, we should not allow anyone here illegally to have a pathway to citizenship one way or the other without them leaving. The Us granted "amnesty" to illegals years ago and it just sent a message to those here now that if they break our laws by entering the country without going through the proper channels, nothing will happen to them and they will eventually get to be US citizens. Well, that is BS and if they cannot come here properly, then they do not deserve citizenship no matter why they are here.Canon-GatoradeWhat about the ones that are illegal that have been here for years? I am in the minority here, but I think those who come out admitting they are illegal, like there was a CNN thing where they came out because they want there parents and think they should be legal citizens because they are like 14-16 years old illegal in the country, I think all those should be kicked out. You have been taking away resources for years, and you want relatives of yours to be instant citizens because of it? No matter how long in they have been in the country, they are lawbreakers and they do not deserve citizenship awarded to them due to the fact that they have been here 16 or so years.
[QUOTE="Canon-Gatorade"][QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]What ever we do, we should not allow anyone here illegally to have a pathway to citizenship one way or the other without them leaving. The Us granted "amnesty" to illegals years ago and it just sent a message to those here now that if they break our laws by entering the country without going through the proper channels, nothing will happen to them and they will eventually get to be US citizens. Well, that is BS and if they cannot come here properly, then they do not deserve citizenship no matter why they are here.WhiteKnight77What about the ones that are illegal that have been here for years? I am in the minority here, but I think those who come out admitting they are illegal, like there was a CNN thing where they came out because they want there parents and think they should be legal citizens because they are like 14-16 years old illegal in the country, I think all those should be kicked out. You have been taking away resources for years, and you want relatives of yours to be instant citizens because of it? No matter how long in they have been in the country, they are lawbreakers and they do not deserve citizenship awarded to them due to the fact that they have been here 16 or so years. But like I said, we are in the minority, and I am not sure if there is a compromise, unless you know one I can't think of.
If the state would open borders and stop funding welfare programs that they (among others) abuse then we wouldn't have to worry about immigrants at all.LaihendiIs getting welfare really that simple for the average citizen?
If the state would open borders and stop funding welfare programs that they (among others) abuse then we wouldn't have to worry about immigrants at all.Laihendi'cept for the raging cartel blood baths in mexico
[QUOTE="Laihendi"]If the state would open borders and stop funding welfare programs that they (among others) abuse then we wouldn't have to worry about immigrants at all.Canon-GatoradeIs getting welfare really that simple for the average citizen? Yes because hospitals are forced by law to serve people even if they don't pay.
[QUOTE="Canon-Gatorade"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]If the state would open borders and stop funding welfare programs that they (among others) abuse then we wouldn't have to worry about immigrants at all.LaihendiIs getting welfare really that simple for the average citizen? Yes because hospitals are forced by law to serve people even if they don't pay. I am talking the other part of the welfare programs.
[QUOTE="Canon-Gatorade"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]If the state would open borders and stop funding welfare programs that they (among others) abuse then we wouldn't have to worry about immigrants at all.LaihendiIs getting welfare really that simple for the average citizen? Yes because hospitals are forced by law to serve people even if they don't pay.so those people should just die if they need help?
Yes because hospitals are forced by law to serve people even if they don't pay.so those people should just die if they need help? If you are concerned about people dying from lack of adequate medical care then feel free to start a charity organization to address that problem. Your bleeding heart liberal agenda is not an excuse to steal my money. If you want to help someone then you do it. I should not be forced to help a stranger. I should be able to keep my money to help myself and those who are important to me.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Canon-Gatorade"] Is getting welfare really that simple for the average citizen?MakeMeaSammitch
Yes because hospitals are forced by law to serve people even if they don't pay.so those people should just die if they need help? I don't know why, but I laughed when I read this. I think that should still be kept as long as they aren't helping some illegal homicidal maniac, which luckily there are not too many of those.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Canon-Gatorade"] Is getting welfare really that simple for the average citizen?MakeMeaSammitch
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]so those people should just die if they need help? If you are concerned about people dying from lack of adequate medical care then feel free to start a charity organization to address that problem. Your bleeding heart liberal agenda is not an excuse to steal my money. If you want to help someone then you do it. I should not be forced to help a stranger. I should be able to keep my money to help myself and those who are important to me.[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Yes because hospitals are forced by law to serve people even if they don't pay.Laihendi
It's a yes or no question. Do you think that people should be left to die if they can't pay or don't have insurance?
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]so those people should just die if they need help? If you are concerned about people dying from lack of adequate medical care then feel free to start a charity organization to address that problem. Your bleeding heart liberal agenda is not an excuse to steal my money. If you want to help someone then you do it. I should not be forced to help a stranger. I should be able to keep my money to help myself and those who are important to me.If you're that selfish of a person, then your opinion doesn't matter.[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Yes because hospitals are forced by law to serve people even if they don't pay.Laihendi
If you are concerned about people dying from lack of adequate medical care then feel free to start a charity organization to address that problem. Your bleeding heart liberal agenda is not an excuse to steal my money. If you want to help someone then you do it. I should not be forced to help a stranger. I should be able to keep my money to help myself and those who are important to me.If you're that selfish of a person, then your opinion doesn't matter. If you can't refute a statement, then your negative opinion of that statement does not matter.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]so those people should just die if they need help?
MakeMeaSammitch
If you are concerned about people dying from lack of adequate medical care then feel free to start a charity organization to address that problem. Your bleeding heart liberal agenda is not an excuse to steal my money. If you want to help someone then you do it. I should not be forced to help a stranger. I should be able to keep my money to help myself and those who are important to me.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]so those people should just die if they need help?
Guybrush_3
It's a yes or no question. Do you think that people should be left to die if they can't pay or don't have insurance?
Lai ignores questions in which he knows that he's boxed in.
If you are concerned about people dying from lack of adequate medical care then feel free to start a charity organization to address that problem. Your bleeding heart liberal agenda is not an excuse to steal my money. If you want to help someone then you do it. I should not be forced to help a stranger. I should be able to keep my money to help myself and those who are important to me.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]so those people should just die if they need help?
Guybrush_3
It's a yes or no question. Do you think that people should be left to die if they can't pay or don't have insurance?
No, I think they should be left to take responsibility for their own lives or find someone who will help them without being threatened at gunpoint by the government.don't deport the illegals, put them in prisons for life. LonelynightThe Mexican Government does that, though maybe not for life.
[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] If you are concerned about people dying from lack of adequate medical care then feel free to start a charity organization to address that problem. Your bleeding heart liberal agenda is not an excuse to steal my money. If you want to help someone then you do it. I should not be forced to help a stranger. I should be able to keep my money to help myself and those who are important to me.Laihendi
It's a yes or no question. Do you think that people should be left to die if they can't pay or don't have insurance?
No, I think they should be left to take responsibility for their own lives or find someone who will help them without being threatened at gunpoint by the government. Contradictory answer.[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] If you are concerned about people dying from lack of adequate medical care then feel free to start a charity organization to address that problem. Your bleeding heart liberal agenda is not an excuse to steal my money. If you want to help someone then you do it. I should not be forced to help a stranger. I should be able to keep my money to help myself and those who are important to me.Laihendi
It's a yes or no question. Do you think that people should be left to die if they can't pay or don't have insurance?
No, I think they should be left to take responsibility for their own lives or find someone who will help them without being threatened at gunpoint by the government.I sincerely hope that you get cancer and can't afford chemo treatment.ultimate irony.
also, you don't work, you don't pay taxes.
No, I think they should be left to take responsibility for their own lives or find someone who will help them without being threatened at gunpoint by the government.I sincerely hope that you get cancer and can't afford chemo treatment.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]
It's a yes or no question. Do you think that people should be left to die if they can't pay or don't have insurance?
MakeMeaSammitch
ultimate irony.
also, you don't work, you don't pay taxes.
He can leech off his parents, broI sincerely hope that you get cancer and can't afford chemo treatment.[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
[QUOTE="Laihendi"] No, I think they should be left to take responsibility for their own lives or find someone who will help them without being threatened at gunpoint by the government.DroidPhysX
ultimate irony.
also, you don't work, you don't pay taxes.
He can leech off his parents, brobut that would contradict his whole personal responsiblity ideals.[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] If you are concerned about people dying from lack of adequate medical care then feel free to start a charity organization to address that problem. Your bleeding heart liberal agenda is not an excuse to steal my money. If you want to help someone then you do it. I should not be forced to help a stranger. I should be able to keep my money to help myself and those who are important to me.Laihendi
It's a yes or no question. Do you think that people should be left to die if they can't pay or don't have insurance?
No, I think they should be left to take responsibility for their own lives or find someone who will help them without being threatened at gunpoint by the government. That looks an awful lot like a "yes" to me.[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] If you are concerned about people dying from lack of adequate medical care then feel free to start a charity organization to address that problem. Your bleeding heart liberal agenda is not an excuse to steal my money. If you want to help someone then you do it. I should not be forced to help a stranger. I should be able to keep my money to help myself and those who are important to me.Laihendi
It's a yes or no question. Do you think that people should be left to die if they can't pay or don't have insurance?
No, I think they should be left to take responsibility for their own lives or find someone who will help them without being threatened at gunpoint by the government.Your answer doesn't make sense you say no but then you make it sound like yes they should be left to die.
If someone breaks into your house, you don't offer them a sandwich and a place to stay. I say total lock-down of the border, and anyone who can't produce papers be deported immediately. If they won't go, DHS has 1.6 billion rounds that can be put to use. They are clearly breaking the law. Would a American citizen get a free pass breaking the law in another country? HELL NO!
If they want to learn English, are a hard worker, pay taxes, and go through the process like everyone else, I'm all for it. But for them to come over and demand a free ride is outrageous.
No, I think they should be left to take responsibility for their own lives or find someone who will help them without being threatened at gunpoint by the government.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]
It's a yes or no question. Do you think that people should be left to die if they can't pay or don't have insurance?
Guybrush_3
Your answer doesn't make sense you say no but then you make it sound like yes they should be left to die.
You are creating a false dilemma. A person doesn't have to receive socialized medicine or die. You are showing an obvious statist bias.No, I think they should be left to take responsibility for their own lives or find someone who will help them without being threatened at gunpoint by the government.I sincerely hope that you get cancer and can't afford chemo treatment.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]
It's a yes or no question. Do you think that people should be left to die if they can't pay or don't have insurance?
MakeMeaSammitch
ultimate irony.
also, you don't work, you don't pay taxes.
It is ironic that you consider me to be an awful person and you to be a good person, when you are the one hoping for others to die of cancer whereas I do not wish harm on anyone. I don't think this is even the first time you have said something like this.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment