This Week's Box Office Results: About Time Edition

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16879 Posts

After over a year of not making these threads due to sheer laziness, I decided to try to do so again. Why? Damned if I know...I'm just lazy AND fickle.

The following results are from Box Office Mojo.com:

PositionTitleWeekend TakeOverall Total (U.S. Only)
1Pitch Perfect 2$70.3 mil$70.3 mil
2Mad Max: Fury Road$44.4 mil$44.4 mil
3Avengers: Age of Ultron$38.8 mil$372 mil
4Hot Pursuit$5.7 mil$23.5 mil
5Paul Blart 2$3.6 mil$62.9 mil
6Furious 7$3.6 mil$343 mil
7The Age of Adeline$3.2 mil$3.2 mil
8Home$2.7 mil$165 mil
9Ex Machina$2.1 mil$19.5 mil
10Far From the Madding Crowd$1.3 mil$2.6 mil

Pitch Perfect 2 took the top spot this weekend with an estimated $70 mil opening. With the movie making back more than double its estimated $29 mil production cost, a third film is pretty much a given.

The other big film opening this weekend, Mad Max: Fury Road, may not have pulled in the numbers the competition did, but its results were nevertheless impressive, pulling in an estimated $44 mil in the US alone, Not bad being that it's an R-rated movie and a follow-up to a franchise whose last installment was 30 years ago. It's chances for a sequel is up in the air at this point--although it's probably THE best reviewed film this year, it's still has ways to go to make up it's estimated $150 million production budget. It still has international openingd to look forward to, so there's a chance it can make up for it there.

Next week's major releases include the sci-fi film Tomorrowland, and the remake of 1982's horror film Poltergeist.

So, sound off OT...What did YOU see this weekend, and was it any good?

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23034 Posts

I'm pretty amazed at the draw a movie about competitive a capella singing is receiving. It's just not my type of movie, I guess.

I'm pretty excited to see Mad Max, but it's probably going to be a while before I'm able to do so. I'm definitely hoping for a sequel.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#3 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

I watched The Theory of Everything from 2014. It is a great film.

Avatar image for sammyjenkis898
sammyjenkis898

28392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 sammyjenkis898
Member since 2007 • 28392 Posts

I hope Poltergeist bombs.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23034 Posts

@sammyjenkis898: Why is that? I haven't followed it at all.

Avatar image for -God-
-God-

3627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 -God-
Member since 2004 • 3627 Posts

Mad Max being only $44m is disheartening, it's probably one of the best action movies ever made.

It's sad that Avengers2 did so much better but isn't even a fraction as good.

Avatar image for sammyjenkis898
sammyjenkis898

28392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By sammyjenkis898
Member since 2007 • 28392 Posts

@mattbbpl said:

@sammyjenkis898: Why is that? I haven't followed it at all.

Because it looks as lazy as every other remake/reboot Hollywood has shit out over the past decade.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23034 Posts

@sammyjenkis898 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@sammyjenkis898: Why is that? I haven't followed it at all.

Because it looks as lazy as every other remake/reboot Hollywood has shit out over the past decade.

That's unfortunate. I'd be pleased if it could pull it together and actually be decent.

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16879 Posts

@-God- said:

Mad Max being only $44m is disheartening, it's probably one of the best action movies ever made.

It's sad that Avengers2 did so much better but isn't even a fraction as good.

I think that the weekend take is on par with what most analysts predicted. It's still an great opening, though, and I imagine once the international openings kick in, it'll go much higher. I I think what probably caught everyone off guard is the huge amount of critical praise for it--I don't think no one saw that coming. Maybe that'll factor in the studio's decision on whether or not they'll go for a sequel.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

56123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10  Edited By DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 56123 Posts

Mad Max did well for a R rated film. Mad Max should hold really well, Pitch Perfect 2 should drop pretty heavily and who knows about Poltergeist and Tomorrowland. We have a four way race for first which pretty much never happens.

Edit: Hallenbeck77, How was Mad Max?

Avatar image for -God-
-God-

3627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By -God-
Member since 2004 • 3627 Posts

Yeah i think MM will have amazing legs and make more money over time rather than instantly due to how it kinda came out of nowhere.

Has very good word of mouth.

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16879 Posts

@davillain- said:

Mad Max did well for a R rated film. Mad Max should hold really well, Pitch Perfect 2 should drop pretty heavily and who knows about Poltergeist and Tomorrowland. We have a four way race for first which pretty much never happens.

Edit: Hallenbeck77, How was Mad Max?

The wife and I went to go see it Friday night, and we both enjoyed it immensely. I give George Miller tons of credit for making an truly old-school action film that's really not made anymore. If you can, try to catch it in theaters, even if it's a matinee show. It's too good to simply wait for the blu-ray or VOD release.

Avatar image for TheHighWind
TheHighWind

5724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 TheHighWind
Member since 2003 • 5724 Posts

Good to see these threads again, or maybe I miss them every week.

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16879 Posts

@TheHighWind said:

Good to see these threads again, or maybe I miss them every week.

I've been very busy--this is the first time in almost a year I've made one, but I'm going to give an honest effort to do so again every Sunday, time permitting.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

56123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#15  Edited By DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 56123 Posts

@hallenbeck77: Cool. I was supposed to go Friday night but I end up working overtime. Going this Wednesdays since I'm off that day.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b797108c254e
deactivated-5b797108c254e

11245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#16 deactivated-5b797108c254e
Member since 2013 • 11245 Posts

So who can tell me what Mad Max is about? I remember watching it as a little kid and thinking it was about a bunch of desert biker gangs chasing and beating each other up. I was thinking whether it goes deeper than that and whether or not I should give this one a shot but I watched the trailer and it still looks like a movie about a bunch of desert biker gangs chasing and beating each other up so I still have no idea what it's about....

Oh yeah, and things like this that makes me go "wtf?"

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16879 Posts

@korvus: Prior to a global war that decimated the world's resources, "Mad" Max Rockatansky was a cop tasked with protecting the highways of the Outback from motorcycle gangs that were terrorizing the citizens. However, he was unable to protect his wife and child from them, which killed his family in cold blood. Pushed to the breaking point, Max hunts them down and takes revenge on them before disappearing into the Outback. By the time second film opens, society has collapsed completely, and war has wiped Australia and its resources of food, fuel and weapons. No longer a cop, Max becomes focused on one thing--his own survival, at any cost.

And things like the gif above makes me go "F*** yeah!"

Avatar image for deactivated-5b797108c254e
deactivated-5b797108c254e

11245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-5b797108c254e
Member since 2013 • 11245 Posts

@hallenbeck77: Ok, nice, so it does have a bit of back story. What about the movies themselves, what do they focus on? Also, thank you for taking the time to explain it to me =D

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16879 Posts

@korvus:

The movies highlight a lot of intense driving action and stuntwork sequences, way before it was fashionable and cheaper to do such things with CGI today. The stories themselves are simple--people and gangs trying to survive and rebuild--to a certain extent--in a post-apocalyptic society. The first two films (Mad Max, Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior) were great. The third movie (Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome) was a bit weaker, but still worth viewing.

Even if you never seen the original films, You can still be able to see Fury Road with no problem. There's a brief narration in the beginning by Max that more or less brings you up to speed in the world of the movie.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b797108c254e
deactivated-5b797108c254e

11245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By deactivated-5b797108c254e
Member since 2013 • 11245 Posts

@hallenbeck77: So should I be expecting a "switch brain off and enjoy the action" kind of movie with very barebone storytelling?

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16879 Posts

@korvus said:

So should I be expecting a "switch brain off and enjoy the action" kind of movie with very barebone storytelling?

Granted the films aren't exactly Shakespeare, and they're not deep, but it'd be a disservice to chalk them up as just "switch brain off and enjoy". From a technical aspect, they showcase how traditional action movies were shot and presented--pure pratical effects, free of stylized editing, hyper-cuts, shaky cam, CGI, etc. that's so commonplace today. Even with the latest movie, the way it's filmed you're able to see and appreciate all of the action taking place onscreen and the return of old-fashioned stuntwork. The director, George MIller, is in his 70s, and what he shows in the latest movie puts more recent action films made by younger directors to shame.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b797108c254e
deactivated-5b797108c254e

11245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-5b797108c254e
Member since 2013 • 11245 Posts

@hallenbeck77: Oh, I understand, I just meant from a storytelling point of view, not a technical one =) Even the trailer shows the quality in that aspect.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

44568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#23 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 44568 Posts

well, at least Mad Max beat Buffy The Vampire: Age of Megatron or whatever it was

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Mad Max was pretty awesome

I'll probably end up watching Pitch Perfect 2 and Age of Ultron this coming weekend

Avatar image for LZ71
LZ71

10524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 LZ71
Member since 2008 • 10524 Posts

Is anyone excited for Tomorrowland. Like at all.

Oh, and

@sammyjenkis898 said:

I hope Poltergeist bombs.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@korvus said:

So who can tell me what Mad Max is about? I remember watching it as a little kid and thinking it was about a bunch of desert biker gangs chasing and beating each other up. I was thinking whether it goes deeper than that and whether or not I should give this one a shot but I watched the trailer and it still looks like a movie about a bunch of desert biker gangs chasing and beating each other up so I still have no idea what it's about....

Oh yeah, and things like this that makes me go "wtf?"

I'm confident that it works well within the context of the movie, but stuff like that gif sort of give me a bad vibe. Viewing it out of context, it just seems TOO excessive and implausible. Like, I'm assuming that's one of the vehicles going after Max and Furiosa. If so, what the hell is the point of that? That's so wildly impractical that it's just ridiculous. That shit is clearly just for show, but who the hell is watching? Why the need to include a mobile concert stage with flame-throwing guitarists when you could just fucking kill Max? Why make a point about showing off your bling when the only person watching is immediately about to get murdered? The Road Warrior was kind of nuts too, but at least it felt a little bit more grounded. When Humongous' men decided to kill Max, they didn't need that extravagant bullshit. They just kept it simple and murdered everyone they could without showing off.

But yeah...I'm sure it works okay in the overall context of the movie. I'll find out tomorrow. But taken out of context, that scene is one of the most goofy looking things to me. No one drives shit like that. ESPECIALLY when they're going into battle and ESPECIALLY when they live in a world where things like gasoline are almost nonexistant.

Avatar image for sammyjenkis898
sammyjenkis898

28392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27  Edited By sammyjenkis898
Member since 2007 • 28392 Posts

@LZ71 said:

Is anyone excited for Tomorrowland. Like at all.

Oh, and

I would be if Lindelof didn't write the thing.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Hopefully more people go see mad max, because with a budget of $150 million it needs to make quite a bit of money for there to be sequels

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#29 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Saw Age of Ultron last night.

Was both delighted and slightly disappointed. It was a solid movie, but definitely no where close to Guardians of the Galaxy in terms of writing and quality... and the sheer lack of setup for Infinity War was severely disappointing (i.e. Thanos being finally brought in as a main antagonist).

It was a "good" comic book movie, but not up to the standard we've come to expect. And it's entire existence was like that of Mass Effect 2 to the Mass Effect franchise. All "setup" for what's coming next. If Infinity War Part 1/2 doesn't step it up, I'm going to be incredibly disappointed.

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#30 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

@-God- said:

Mad Max being only $44m is disheartening, it's probably one of the best action movies ever made.

It's sad that Avengers2 did so much better but isn't even a fraction as good.

44m opening weekend for an R-rated film is quite excellent. The studio is extremely happy right now with that result. What was a gamble and could have been a $100 million loss will now make money for the studio. The Hangover for example had a $44 million dollar opening weekend and went on to earn $277 million. Mad Max likely won't hold as well as The Hangover but they can expect really decent profit from the film. It should take home at least $150 million from the domestic haul. It'll likely have decent holdovers given the good reviews and no significant action films being released for a few weeks.

Avatar image for -God-
-God-

3627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31  Edited By -God-
Member since 2004 • 3627 Posts

@ferrari2001 said:
@-God- said:

Mad Max being only $44m is disheartening, it's probably one of the best action movies ever made.

It's sad that Avengers2 did so much better but isn't even a fraction as good.

44m opening weekend for an R-rated film is quite excellent. The studio is extremely happy right now with that result. What was a gamble and could have been a $100 million loss will now make money for the studio. The Hangover for example had a $44 million dollar opening weekend and went on to earn $277 million. Mad Max likely won't hold as well as The Hangover but they can expect really decent profit from the film. It should take home at least $150 million from the domestic haul. It'll likely have decent holdovers given the good reviews and no significant action films being released for a few weeks.

True, but I feel a movie this good deserves to do by far much better. It's sucks when crap like Avengers: Age of Tranformers makes 10x more cash.

Avatar image for Qixote
Qixote

10843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#32 Qixote
Member since 2002 • 10843 Posts

Not too shabby for rated R. The last rated R movie to do better than $44 million opening weekend was Fifty Shades of Grey in February with a whopping $85m (alot of horny females out there). Before that you have to go all the way back to last June with 22 Jump Street with $57m. Still, I thought Max would have done better than it did. Similar to Star Wars, it has alot of nostalgia from older movies driving it. And the stellar reviews in the consensus definitely should have given it a bigger boost than it did.

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33  Edited By Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16879 Posts

@Qixote said:

Not too shabby for rated R. The last rated R movie to do better than $44 million opening weekend was Fifty Shades of Grey in February with a whopping $85m (alot of horny females out there). Before that you have to go all the way back to last June with 22 Jump Street with $57m. Still, I thought Max would have done better than it did. Similar to Star Wars, it has alot of nostalgia from older movies driving it. And the stellar reviews in the consensus definitely should have given it a bigger boost than it did.

I think the reviews and the take make internationally are going to weigh in heavy in the studio's decision to greenlight the sequel, if they do decide to (As of today, it's made $110 worldwide total.)

Avatar image for silkylove
silkylove

8579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 silkylove
Member since 2002 • 8579 Posts

As others have said, Mad Max is killing it overseas. They'll be well north of the $150 million budget by next week. Hardy has already signed on for three more so no worries. Sequel assured.

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16879 Posts

@silkylove said:

As others have said, Mad Max is killing it overseas. They'll be well north of the $150 million budget by next week. Hardy has already signed on for three more so no worries. Sequel assured.

That's a standard clause in a lot of contracts. Just because an actor has signed on to make a sequel, it doesn't mean that it will always get made--despite the accolades some movies get, the bottom line for movie studios, is that first and foremost, it's a business. Most studios aren't willing to sink $100-150 million plus into a project if they aren't going to get a significant return--just making back production costs won't be enough. Just for the sake of argument, if it doesn't get the numbers they hope for once it's said and done, you can bet that either:

A. They'll make a follow-up, but make changes to make it more profitable (ex. a PG-13 rating to get more people in theaters to see it), or lower the budget.

B. They'll scrap the sequel altogether (Possible, but I think unlikely at this point.)

Avatar image for silkylove
silkylove

8579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By silkylove
Member since 2002 • 8579 Posts

@hallenbeck77:

I also said they'll be in the black by next week. Of course studios tend to lock up an actor for multiple sequels regardless, but if you combine that with outstanding ratings, the fact that the movie is a virtual lock to make over $250 million at the box office if it has any legs at all (it will since Jurassic World is almost a month away), the fact that Miller already has the story for the next one, and a sequel is assured. And we're not even talking about bluray/DVD sales, the book, the art of the movie book, the comics, the soundtrack. All of these are selling well. iOTA has seen an increase in his album sales simply because people loved Coma Doof Warrior.