The Martin Luther King memorial statue looks communistic and authoriarian = BAD

  • 86 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Meat_Wad_Fan
Meat_Wad_Fan

9054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Meat_Wad_Fan
Member since 2002 • 9054 Posts

This almost sounds like a regurgitated racist Rush Limbaugh quote... just a hunch.

Avatar image for MetallicaKings
MetallicaKings

4781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 MetallicaKings
Member since 2004 • 4781 Posts

So a quick read of an article said this:

"Jackson said when presented with photographs of four different versions of the statue, which were created by Yixin, Martin Luther King III and sister Bernice King chose the current likeness of their father standing with his arms crossed."

and

"Jackson said he informed the siblings that the particular image they chose had been generating controversy because some say it appears too confrontational. He said King III replied, "Well if my father was not confrontational, given what he was facing at the time, what else could he be?"

http://www.qcitymetro.com/news/articles/controversy_continues_over_mlk_memorial085712598.cfm

I think this sums it up

Avatar image for MetallicaKings
MetallicaKings

4781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 MetallicaKings
Member since 2004 • 4781 Posts

uh oh...

Phaze-Two

You just had to quote me after i realized what i said.

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
he made that pose in a well known photo i believe
Avatar image for PeterDuck
PeterDuck

1048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#56 PeterDuck
Member since 2005 • 1048 Posts

At least communism doesn't exploit third world countries, at least communism doesn't have inheritance wealth, at least communism doesn't bail out the super rich, at least communism doesn't borrow from the future generations, at least communism negates the existence of the rampant greedy corporations, I can go on forever, but that's another subject.

btw, there are plenty more other things that have disgraced America in the past as well as the present.

The only thing I thought when I heard of the Martin Luther King's statue is "why did it take so long to erect it"?

Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

It's not a great design, but I think you're overreacting.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

At least communism doesn't exploit third world countries, at least communism doesn't have inheritance wealth, at least communism doesn't bail out the super rich, at least communism doesn't borrow from the future generations, at least communism negates the existence of the rampant greedy corporations, I can go on forever, but that's another subject.

btw, there are plenty more other things that have disgraced America in the past as well as the present.

The only thing I thought when I heard of the Martin Luther King's statue is "why did it take so long to erect it"?

PeterDuck
I must say good sir, Joseph Stalin is looking up at us after reading that post.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#59 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

They only unveiled it about 30 mins ago I think so they're scarce it seems. Here's one tho. MissLibrarian

Looks like the guy quit halfway through unless he was going for the Michaelangelo prisoners of stone look.

Avatar image for MissLibrarian
MissLibrarian

9589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 MissLibrarian
Member since 2008 • 9589 Posts
Also I can't quote your image.:(LJS9502_basic
Well what do you want me to do about it? Point and laugh? :P
Avatar image for DarthJohnova
DarthJohnova

4599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 DarthJohnova
Member since 2010 • 4599 Posts

At least communism doesn't exploit third world countries, at least communism doesn't have inheritance wealth, at least communism doesn't bail out the super rich, at least communism doesn't borrow from the future generations, at least communism negates the existence of the rampant greedy corporations, I can go on forever, but that's another subject.

btw, there are plenty more other things that have disgraced America in the past as well as the present.

The only thing I thought when I heard of the Martin Luther King's statue is "why did it take so long to erect it"?

PeterDuck

Erect...teehee... :D

Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

At least communism doesn't exploit third world countries

PeterDuck

Have you ever heard of every communistic country in history?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178860 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Also I can't quote your image.:(MissLibrarian
Well what do you want me to do about it? Point and laugh? :P

Weep seems appropriate.:P
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#64 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
There are some aspects of idealised communism that would definitely be beneficial. I'm not sure why so many people are still stuck in blaming communism for all the problems in the world.
Avatar image for fidosim
fidosim

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#65 fidosim
Member since 2003 • 12901 Posts

This clip seems rather relevant given the discussion at hand.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvB5a9_XJ3I#t=6m40s

Not linked because of glitchspot.

Avatar image for Phaze-Two
Phaze-Two

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Phaze-Two
Member since 2009 • 3444 Posts

[QUOTE="Phaze-Two"]

uh oh...

MetallicaKings

You just had to quote me after i realized what i said.

sorry, I deleted it.

Avatar image for MissLibrarian
MissLibrarian

9589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#67 MissLibrarian
Member since 2008 • 9589 Posts
Weep seems appropriate.:PLJS9502_basic
I think you're overestimating my level of emotional involvement in this matter I'm sorry to say.
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#68 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

How does it look communistic? Is he holding a hammer and sickle? Also, most modern-day conservatives would be calling King a communist if he were alive.

Anyways, it does look a little too authoritarian, and it would have been nice to see an African-American artist do it, and it would have been nice to buy American stone.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178860 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Weep seems appropriate.:PMissLibrarian
I think you're overestimating my level of emotional involvement in this matter I'm sorry to say.

:lol: Well it would have been nice....
Avatar image for PeterDuck
PeterDuck

1048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#70 PeterDuck
Member since 2005 • 1048 Posts

[QUOTE="PeterDuck"]

At least communism doesn't exploit third world countries

metroidfood

Have you ever heard of every communistic country in history?

Cuba, USSR. North Korea. There, three separate instances of countries that do not and did not rely on foreign labor to propel and SUSTAIN their economies. Cuba and North Korea have been embargoed for decades which greatly contributes to starvation and economic stagnation. The argument is that the principles of communism are not based on exploitation of those who would be willing to work for less than others. If you find those that will work for 5 cents an hour or whatever (like the Chinese mass producing products for the USA for instance) then why would you pay 15 bucks an hour to an American? that is one of the evils of rampant capitalism and that was the implied principle I was referring to.
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#71 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

There are some aspects of idealised communism that would definitely be beneficial. I'm not sure why so many people are still stuck in blaming communism for all the problems in the world.foxhound_fox

Because communists TOOK UR JIBS!!!

Or maybe it's because of all the misinformation and propaganda that's been spread over the years to smear communism in any form.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178860 Posts
[QUOTE="metroidfood"]

[QUOTE="PeterDuck"]

At least communism doesn't exploit third world countries

PeterDuck

Have you ever heard of every communistic country in history?

Cuba, USSR. North Korea. There, three separate instances of countries that do not and did not rely on foreign labor to propel and SUSTAIN their economies. Cuba and North Korea have been embargoed for decades which greatly contributes to starvation and economic stagnation. The argument is that the principles of communism are not based on exploitation of those who would be willing to work for less than others. If you find those that will work for 5 cents an hour or whatever (like the Chinese mass producing products for the USA for instance) then why would you pay 15 bucks an hour to an American? that is one of the evils of rampant capitalism and that was the implied principle I was referring to.

However they haven't been so good to their citizens.
Avatar image for PeterDuck
PeterDuck

1048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#73 PeterDuck
Member since 2005 • 1048 Posts
There are some aspects of idealised communism that would definitely be beneficial. I'm not sure why so many people are still stuck in blaming communism for all the problems in the world.foxhound_fox
because every other person in capitalist societies thinks that they will somehow be rich one day, which is why they defend the rich, which is why they bail out the rich - they defend an idea, a hope that one day they might be like them. The truth is, only a small percentage ever succeed. And I'm not even talking about those who inherited their wealth.
Avatar image for PeterDuck
PeterDuck

1048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#74 PeterDuck
Member since 2005 • 1048 Posts

However they haven't been so good to their citizens.

I knew this one was coming. It's always inevitable. But how would an idealistic philosophy of communism otherwise survive and persist in the world where the whole of capitalistic-owned world is turned against them? I'm not justifying the actions of communist leaders setting up internment camps and such per se, nor do I think they do it because they are in love with communistic principles necessarily, they do it because they are allowed to. Take away that ability, make them responsible and accountable and take away the restraints of western embargoes and threats of aggression and then you can run the communist experiment and see how it plays out. If it fails in a fair fight then we might just as well conclude that communism is a failed idea OR that humanity isn't mature enough for communism yet.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#75 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="PeterDuck"][QUOTE="metroidfood"]

Have you ever heard of every communistic country in history?

LJS9502_basic

Cuba, USSR. North Korea. There, three separate instances of countries that do not and did not rely on foreign labor to propel and SUSTAIN their economies. Cuba and North Korea have been embargoed for decades which greatly contributes to starvation and economic stagnation. The argument is that the principles of communism are not based on exploitation of those who would be willing to work for less than others. If you find those that will work for 5 cents an hour or whatever (like the Chinese mass producing products for the USA for instance) then why would you pay 15 bucks an hour to an American? that is one of the evils of rampant capitalism and that was the implied principle I was referring to.

However they haven't been so good to their citizens.

That's debatable. North Korea I won't defend, but they're barely communist anyways, more of a dictatorship that came to power using communist rhetoric. The USSR, many citizens had fairly decent standards of living until their economy started going downhill (and really that wasn't due to anything endemic to communism), though that is excepting the people that had their property reposessed or were jailed or killed by the regime. On that note, though, Stalin was a major departure from traditional communism and killed as many Trotskyists as he did anti-communists.

Cuba, they simply don't have many marketable resources. The citizens are poor because they live in a poor country, not because they live in a communist country. However, there are many Cubans who don't mind the standard of living, especially in comparison to the U.S., which they see as extravagant and exploitative.

Avatar image for PeterDuck
PeterDuck

1048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#76 PeterDuck
Member since 2005 • 1048 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="PeterDuck"] Cuba, USSR. North Korea. There, three separate instances of countries that do not and did not rely on foreign labor to propel and SUSTAIN their economies. Cuba and North Korea have been embargoed for decades which greatly contributes to starvation and economic stagnation. The argument is that the principles of communism are not based on exploitation of those who would be willing to work for less than others. If you find those that will work for 5 cents an hour or whatever (like the Chinese mass producing products for the USA for instance) then why would you pay 15 bucks an hour to an American? that is one of the evils of rampant capitalism and that was the implied principle I was referring to.theone86

However they haven't been so good to their citizens.

That's debatable. North Korea I won't defend, but they're barely communist anyways, more of a dictatorship that came to power using communist rhetoric. The USSR, many citizens had fairly decent standards of living until their economy started going downhill (and really that wasn't due to anything endemic to communism), though that is excepting the people that had their property reposessed or were jailed or killed by the regime. On that note, though, Stalin was a major departure from traditional communism and killed as many Trotskyists as he did anti-communists.

Cuba, they simply don't have many marketable resources. The citizens are poor because they live in a poor country, not because they live in a communist country. However, there are many Cubans who don't mind the standard of living, especially in comparison to the U.S., which they see as extravagant and exploitative.

I know it's debatable. I'm just making arguments and pointing to some misconceptions about communism. People assume that communism fails or failed because on its own accord without realizing that there were competing and much stronger countries with opposing ideologies. It was not a fair fight. I agree about Korea, however, it is obvious that so many countries do not like Korea because of it's forcefull collective system and militarism which is why they won't trade with it. There are plenty of other dictatorships in Africa for instance that get the US foreign aid in exchange for spheres of influence, however this "foreign aid" only ends up keeping the particular dictator in power. Korea does not get any of that, it is being starved to death, so go figure whether more North Koreans die of state-created starvation as opposed to foreign-created starvation. Yes, Stalin put plenty of taint on communism that isn't going away any time soon.

"The citizens are poor because they live in a poor country, not because they live in a communist country."

precisely. You nailed it

As for Cuba, well, they could be making a fortune with Tourism and Tobacco sales for instance, but they are being embargoed and travel is restricted. And the Central and South American countries are being influenced by the US through foreign aid and other means to NOT trade with Cuba, hence, no fair fight

Avatar image for tylergamereview
tylergamereview

2051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#77 tylergamereview
Member since 2006 • 2051 Posts

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

I guess taste is different for all people, but I think it looks like crap.

Reminds me of Han Solo after Jaba the Hut froze his arse.

GreySeal9

I don't know if I'd go as far as to call it crap, but it does rub me the wrong way for some reason.

Same for me. I don't care who made it, but this statue doesn't really do it for me. He should look more friendly I think. Stop crossing those arms and open them up in a big hug.

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

[QUOTE="PeterDuck"]

At least communism doesn't exploit third world countries

metroidfood

Have you ever heard of every communistic country in history?

History,

China's still doing it

:P

Avatar image for bigdcstile
bigdcstile

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 bigdcstile
Member since 2004 • 2236 Posts

How does it look communistic? Is he holding a hammer and sickle? Also, most modern-day conservatives would be calling King a communist if he were alive.

Anyways, it does look a little too authoritarian, and it would have been nice to see an African-American artist do it, and it would have been nice to buy American stone.

theone86
If he were alive? Dude, they called him a communist when he was alive.
Avatar image for Tokugawa77
Tokugawa77

1554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#80 Tokugawa77
Member since 2009 • 1554 Posts

I knew this one was coming. It's always inevitable. But how would an idealistic philosophy of communism otherwise survive and persist in the world where the whole of capitalistic-owned world is turned against them? I'm not justifying the actions of communist leaders setting up internment camps and such per se, nor do I think they do it because they are in love with communistic principles necessarily, they do it because they are allowed to. Take away that ability, make them responsible and accountable and take away the restraints of western embargoes and threats of aggression and then you can run the communist experiment and see how it plays out. If it fails in a fair fight then we might just as well conclude that communism is a failed idea OR that humanity isn't mature enough for communism yet.

PeterDuck

Communism sounds all nice and fair, but it is not and never will be practical. As long as such as thing as human greed exists, communism will always fail and be worse to the people it claims to defend than capitalism ever was.

It is a good point though, that Cuba is poor becase of embargoes (imposed by capitalists), not because of the fact that they are communist.

Avatar image for the_ChEeSe_mAn2
the_ChEeSe_mAn2

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Member since 2003 • 8463 Posts
Not sure if I agree with that particular pose as well. Even though he did strike that similar pose in a photo, I don't think it makes a good memorial pose.
Avatar image for PeterDuck
PeterDuck

1048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#82 PeterDuck
Member since 2005 • 1048 Posts

[QUOTE="metroidfood"]

[QUOTE="PeterDuck"]

At least communism doesn't exploit third world countries

dercoo

Have you ever heard of every communistic country in history?

History,

China's still doing it

:P

not really China has millionaires and billionaires
Avatar image for PeterDuck
PeterDuck

1048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#83 PeterDuck
Member since 2005 • 1048 Posts

[QUOTE="PeterDuck"]

I knew this one was coming. It's always inevitable. But how would an idealistic philosophy of communism otherwise survive and persist in the world where the whole of capitalistic-owned world is turned against them? I'm not justifying the actions of communist leaders setting up internment camps and such per se, nor do I think they do it because they are in love with communistic principles necessarily, they do it because they are allowed to. Take away that ability, make them responsible and accountable and take away the restraints of western embargoes and threats of aggression and then you can run the communist experiment and see how it plays out. If it fails in a fair fight then we might just as well conclude that communism is a failed idea OR that humanity isn't mature enough for communism yet.

Tokugawa77

Communism sounds all nice and fair, but it is not and never will be practical. As long as such as thing as human greed exists, communism will always fail and be worse to the people it claims to defend than capitalism ever was.

It is a good point though, that Cuba is poor becase of embargoes (imposed by capitalists), not because of the fact that they are communist.

there is such a thing as learning from mistakes. I know human nature sucks, nor do I think that communism is necessarily the way to go. Im simply not going to nay say without know most of the facts. Communism did not have a fair fight, at least yet. So it doesn't warrant to say that it failed because of human greed, There were other factors, such as the fact that America practically ruled the world in the 20th century and still does to a degree today.
Avatar image for r4v3gl0ry
r4v3gl0ry

1285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#85 r4v3gl0ry
Member since 2006 • 1285 Posts

It's definitely not communistic but it has an aura of authority to it. It also looks like it was made to revere. But again, it's MLK with a stoic and proud look, not The Greatest Most Respected and Glorious and Did I Mention Awesome Leader Martin Il-Sung Jr...

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

44635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#86 lamprey263  Online
Member since 2006 • 44635 Posts
the place holder plague to the statue reads...
At this site will be erected the Dr Martin Luther King Jr Memorial The memorial will embody the man, the movement, and the message. It will honor the 20th century visionary who brought about change through the principles of nonviolence and equality for all. It will be a memorial symbolizing promise and hope for a brighter future for humanity.
...jeez, just seething with communist sentiment. :roll: