Multiple terrorist attacks in Israel; use RPG's and mortars. Seven dead.

  • 109 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#1 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16052281

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-08/18/c_131058947.htm

Egypt can't control the Sinai..who would've thought?

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Didnt you post this last week canned?

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#3 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

Didnt you post this last week canned?

tenaka2
Elaborate my friend.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#4 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Watch Israel's response be massive and leads to tons of collateral damage without actually achieving their goal thus breeding more terrorists. You think they would have learned by now.

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#5 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

Watch Israel's response be massive and leads to tons of collateral damage without actually achieving their goal thus breeding more terrorists. You think they would have learned by now.

Wasdie
"Without achieving their goal"...actually, Israel has a very good ratio at "achieving their goals". Responding to attacks with an offensive always works for Israel. It lets their enemies know who that they can't win. See: a halt in 10+ years of rocket attacks from Gaza after Cast Lead. If they didn't do anything then their enemies would think they could get away with anything and thus more attacks.
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#6 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
waits for isreak to commence massive bombing runs causing loads of collatiral damage... Then watch the world do nothing about it. Multiple accusation that Hezbullah is behiend the attacks ( including th shot up bus) wonder what's gonna happen next....another invasion of lebanon?
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Watch Israel's response be massive and leads to tons of collateral damage without actually achieving their goal thus breeding more terrorists. You think they would have learned by now.

CannedWorms

"Without achieving their goal"...actually, Israel has a very good ratio at "achieving their goals". Responding to attacks with an offensive always works for Israel. It lets their enemies know who that they can't win. See: a halt in 10+ years of rocket attacks from Gaza after Cast Lead. If they didn't do anything then their enemies would think they could get away with anything and thus more attacks.

Good description of the 'circle of violence'.

Thank god the internal pressure in the U.S. is forcing the government to no longer condone the crimes against humanity Israel are guilty off. Hopefully the U.S. will cut off funding soon.

Avatar image for Kantus_Mage
Kantus_Mage

172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Kantus_Mage
Member since 2011 • 172 Posts

Watch Israel's response be massive and leads to tons of collateral damage without actually achieving their goal thus breeding more terrorists. You think they would have learned by now.

Wasdie

So they would act like the US?

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#9 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

waits for isreak to commence massive bombing runs causing loads of collatiral damage... Then watch the world do nothing about it. Multiple accusation that Hezbullah is behiend the attacks ( including th shot up bus) wonder what's gonna happen next....another invasion of lebanon?mayceV
I think Israel will simply hit back harder at militants in Gaza. They will also speed up the building of a fence along the Egypt-Israel border. And I wouldn't be surprised if Hezbollah was behind the attacks, they're desperate for another war (a few weeks ago they shot at the IDF at the Israel-Lebanon border). Their puppet master Iran wants a shadow war with Israel. Soon we will see Hamas, Hezbollah and Syria attack Israel to take the heat off Assad.

Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#10 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Watch Israel's response be massive and leads to tons of collateral damage without actually achieving their goal thus breeding more terrorists. You think they would have learned by now.

CannedWorms

"Without achieving their goal"...actually, Israel has a very good ratio at "achieving their goals". Responding to attacks with an offensive always works for Israel. It lets their enemies know who that they can't win. See: a halt in 10+ years of rocket attacks from Gaza after Cast Lead. If they didn't do anything then their enemies would think they could get away with anything and thus more attacks.

Obviously it doesn't always work for Israel, since well, it's something they've always had to do. Tsk tsk. (;

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#11 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Watch Israel's response be massive and leads to tons of collateral damage without actually achieving their goal thus breeding more terrorists. You think they would have learned by now.

tenaka2

"Without achieving their goal"...actually, Israel has a very good ratio at "achieving their goals". Responding to attacks with an offensive always works for Israel. It lets their enemies know who that they can't win. See: a halt in 10+ years of rocket attacks from Gaza after Cast Lead. If they didn't do anything then their enemies would think they could get away with anything and thus more attacks.

Good description of the 'circle of violence'.

Thank god the internal pressure in the U.S. is forcing the government to no longer condone the crimes against humanity Israel are guilty off. Hopefully the U.S. will cut off funding soon.

So are you going to explain how I posted this news last week even though it only happened a few hours ago? And I don't think Israel will care that much if America cuts funding, if anything the US has more to lose seeing as how they will less influence over Israel-Middle East affairs as well as not being able to share Israeli's technology expertise (see: Iron Dome).

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#12 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Watch Israel's response be massive and leads to tons of collateral damage without actually achieving their goal thus breeding more terrorists. You think they would have learned by now.

BiancaDK

"Without achieving their goal"...actually, Israel has a very good ratio at "achieving their goals". Responding to attacks with an offensive always works for Israel. It lets their enemies know who that they can't win. See: a halt in 10+ years of rocket attacks from Gaza after Cast Lead. If they didn't do anything then their enemies would think they could get away with anything and thus more attacks.

Obviously it doesn't always work for Israel, since well, it's something they've always had to do. Tsk tsk. (;

They always come out fine in the end though. Something you hate to see. (;
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#13 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
[QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Watch Israel's response be massive and leads to tons of collateral damage without actually achieving their goal thus breeding more terrorists. You think they would have learned by now.

"Without achieving their goal"...actually, Israel has a very good ratio at "achieving their goals". Responding to attacks with an offensive always works for Israel. It lets their enemies know who that they can't win. See: a halt in 10+ years of rocket attacks from Gaza after Cast Lead. If they didn't do anything then their enemies would think they could get away with anything and thus more attacks.

...they did so by killing/injuring thousands of civilians in Gaza, or in Jenin where there was a massacre, ok they may get things done...to a certian extent ( rockets are still being fired by freelance terorists from gaza) But they have no care for how it gets done or how disporportional thier response Is to the threat. of the 200 rockets that launched from gaza before cast lead VERY few isrealis were killed or injured. Yet they went in as though all the world was going to end and bombed everything and litterally made it so that gaza was cripple in every way imagineable. Almost all the livestock was killed in gaza durring cast lead, 85% of the farmland 1400 civilians were killed in 2 weeks over 6000 were injured the entire sewage system of Gaza was annihlated, Red cross was no allowed in 59 heath care facilities were hit 2 by white phosphrus, schools, and 600 or so building were destroyed, 8 health personnel were killed. and yet nothing was accomplished. in the case of jenin the took control of the City yet terroristism hasn't stopped so yet agian nothing accomplished really maybe its lessened in the case of jenin but all in all Isreal hasn't made any progress since 06 other than kill thousands of palestinians.
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"]"Without achieving their goal"...actually, Israel has a very good ratio at "achieving their goals". Responding to attacks with an offensive always works for Israel. It lets their enemies know who that they can't win. See: a halt in 10+ years of rocket attacks from Gaza after Cast Lead. If they didn't do anything then their enemies would think they could get away with anything and thus more attacks.CannedWorms

Good description of the 'circle of violence'.

Thank god the internal pressure in the U.S. is forcing the government to no longer condone the crimes against humanity Israel are guilty off. Hopefully the U.S. will cut off funding soon.

So are you going to explain how I posted this news last week even though it only happened a few hours ago? And I don't think Israel will care that much if America cuts funding, if anything the US has more to lose seeing as how they will less influence over Israel-Middle East affairs as well as not being able to share Israeli's technology expertise (see: Iron Dome).

My apologies, its an easy mistake to make your post are all very very similiar.

Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#15 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

They always come out fine in the end though. Something you hate to see. (;CannedWorms

Fine in the end eh? Tell that to the 7 dead jews. : D

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#16 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts

[QUOTE="mayceV"]waits for isreak to commence massive bombing runs causing loads of collatiral damage... Then watch the world do nothing about it. Multiple accusation that Hezbullah is behiend the attacks ( including th shot up bus) wonder what's gonna happen next....another invasion of lebanon?CannedWorms

I think Israel will simply hit back harder at militants in Gaza. They will also speed up the building of a fence along the Egypt-Israel border. And I wouldn't be surprised if Hezbollah was behind the attacks, they're desperate for another war (a few weeks ago they shot at the IDF at the Israel-Lebanon border). Their puppet master Iran wants a shadow war with Israel. Soon we will see Hamas, Hezbollah and Syria attack Israel to take the heat off Assad.

hat is not a good thing. you seem to think that Isreal constantly bombing Gaza is a soultion all it does is worsen thier crimes against humanity and get all their niehghbors pissed off. Nothing is achieved then there's isreals reluctance to make any kind of recognition that the palestian territories are anything other than land to be colonized. The seperation wall is Illeagal the settlements are detrimental to the peace process that already has a leg in the grave. Isreal is making it very difficult to come to any form of peace as shown by the palestine papers. Isreal is digging a hole that pretty soon even the US can't help it out of.
Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#17 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts
[QUOTE="mayceV"][QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Watch Israel's response be massive and leads to tons of collateral damage without actually achieving their goal thus breeding more terrorists. You think they would have learned by now.

"Without achieving their goal"...actually, Israel has a very good ratio at "achieving their goals". Responding to attacks with an offensive always works for Israel. It lets their enemies know who that they can't win. See: a halt in 10+ years of rocket attacks from Gaza after Cast Lead. If they didn't do anything then their enemies would think they could get away with anything and thus more attacks.

...they did so by killing/injuring thousands of civilians in Gaza, or in Jenin where there was a massacre, ok they may get things done...to a certian extent ( rockets are still being fired by freelance terorists from gaza) But they have no care for how it gets done or how disporportional thier response Is to the threat. of the 200 rockets that launched from gaza before cast lead VERY few isrealis were killed or injured. Yet they went in as though all the world was going to end and bombed everything and litterally made it so that gaza was cripple in every way imagineable. Almost all the livestock was killed in gaza durring cast lead, 85% of the farmland 1400 civilians were killed in 2 weeks over 6000 were injured the entire sewage system of Gaza was annihlated, Red cross was no allowed in 59 heath care facilities were hit 2 by white phosphrus, schools, and 600 or so building were destroyed, 8 health personnel were killed. and yet nothing was accomplished. in the case of jenin the took control of the City yet terroristism hasn't stopped so yet agian nothing accomplished really maybe its lessened in the case of jenin but all in all Isreal hasn't made any progress since 06 other than kill thousands of palestinians.

200? No... 2001:   4 2002:  35 2003: 155 2004: 281 2005: 179 2006: 946 2007: 896 And 21 people were killed..not to mention the countless time Israeli's were forced into bomb shelters. Cast Lead helped put an end to that. If Israel didn't respond Hamas would think they could get with it. BUT after Cast Lead they were forced into stopping rocket attacks as they were desperate to avoid another war with Israel. They even had to discipline splinter groups..something that was previously unheard of. So yes Israel accomplished what they intended.
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Watch Israel's response be massive and leads to tons of collateral damage without actually achieving their goal thus breeding more terrorists. You think they would have learned by now.

mayceV
"Without achieving their goal"...actually, Israel has a very good ratio at "achieving their goals". Responding to attacks with an offensive always works for Israel. It lets their enemies know who that they can't win. See: a halt in 10+ years of rocket attacks from Gaza after Cast Lead. If they didn't do anything then their enemies would think they could get away with anything and thus more attacks.

...they did so by killing/injuring thousands of civilians in Gaza, or in Jenin where there was a massacre, ok they may get things done...to a certian extent ( rockets are still being fired by freelance terorists from gaza) But they have no care for how it gets done or how disporportional thier response Is to the threat. of the 200 rockets that launched from gaza before cast lead VERY few isrealis were killed or injured. Yet they went in as though all the world was going to end and bombed everything and litterally made it so that gaza was cripple in every way imagineable. Almost all the livestock was killed in gaza durring cast lead, 85% of the farmland 1400 civilians were killed in 2 weeks over 6000 were injured the entire sewage system of Gaza was annihlated, Red cross was no allowed in 59 heath care facilities were hit 2 by white phosphrus, schools, and 600 or so building were destroyed, 8 health personnel were killed. and yet nothing was accomplished. in the case of jenin the took control of the City yet terroristism hasn't stopped so yet agian nothing accomplished really maybe its lessened in the case of jenin but all in all Isreal hasn't made any progress since 06 other than kill thousands of palestinians.

Does it really matter if only one was killed by rockets from gaza and thousands killed by retaliation from Israel? Just because the initiation was not effective does not mean the retaliation should follow like a domino. They have made it clear that they hold the same mentality as those who want them culled. Just that Israel seems to be much better at making every attack do as much as possible.
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#19 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
[QUOTE="mayceV"][QUOTE="CannedWorms"]"Without achieving their goal"...actually, Israel has a very good ratio at "achieving their goals". Responding to attacks with an offensive always works for Israel. It lets their enemies know who that they can't win. See: a halt in 10+ years of rocket attacks from Gaza after Cast Lead. If they didn't do anything then their enemies would think they could get away with anything and thus more attacks.CannedWorms
...they did so by killing/injuring thousands of civilians in Gaza, or in Jenin where there was a massacre, ok they may get things done...to a certian extent ( rockets are still being fired by freelance terorists from gaza) But they have no care for how it gets done or how disporportional thier response Is to the threat. of the 200 rockets that launched from gaza before cast lead VERY few isrealis were killed or injured. Yet they went in as though all the world was going to end and bombed everything and litterally made it so that gaza was cripple in every way imagineable. Almost all the livestock was killed in gaza durring cast lead, 85% of the farmland 1400 civilians were killed in 2 weeks over 6000 were injured the entire sewage system of Gaza was annihlated, Red cross was no allowed in 59 heath care facilities were hit 2 by white phosphrus, schools, and 600 or so building were destroyed, 8 health personnel were killed. and yet nothing was accomplished. in the case of jenin the took control of the City yet terroristism hasn't stopped so yet agian nothing accomplished really maybe its lessened in the case of jenin but all in all Isreal hasn't made any progress since 06 other than kill thousands of palestinians.

200? No... 2001:   4 2002:  35 2003: 155 2004: 281 2005: 179 2006: 946 2007: 896 And 21 people were killed..not to mention the countless time Israeli's were forced into bomb shelters. Cast Lead helped put an end to that. If Israel didn't respond Hamas would think they could get with it. BUT after Cast Lead they were forced into stopping rocket attacks as they were desperate to avoid another war with Israel. They even had to discipline splinter groups..something that was previously unheard of. So yes Israel accomplished what they intended.

so because 21 people were killed and the couple thousand (if even that) forcced into bomb shelters you say Isreal had the right to drop hundreds of bombs on civilians? health care facilities? really? come on now I can accept isreal defending itself that is perfectly reasonable. However the way theydo it is illeagal and immoral. Now what do you say to the massacre in jenin? what is the justification there?
Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#20 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"]They always come out fine in the end though. Something you hate to see. (;BiancaDK

Fine in the end eh? Tell that to the 7 dead jews. : D

Shows you up for the person you truely are. And if I was going to respond with an actual reply..then you are thinking small-scale. Look at the bigger picture and you'll see which country is the more fruitful despite what it's up against. (;
Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#21 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"]

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

Good description of the 'circle of violence'.

Thank god the internal pressure in the U.S. is forcing the government to no longer condone the crimes against humanity Israel are guilty off. Hopefully the U.S. will cut off funding soon.

tenaka2

So are you going to explain how I posted this news last week even though it only happened a few hours ago? And I don't think Israel will care that much if America cuts funding, if anything the US has more to lose seeing as how they will less influence over Israel-Middle East affairs as well as not being able to share Israeli's technology expertise (see: Iron Dome).

My apologies, its an easy mistake to make your post are all very very similiar.

Oh, that was intended to be a joke? Leave it to the professionals is my advice. And I could say the same to you..
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"]They always come out fine in the end though. Something you hate to see. (;CannedWorms

Fine in the end eh? Tell that to the 7 dead jews. : D

Shows you up for the person you truely are. And if I was going to respond with an actual reply..then you are thinking small-scale. Look at the bigger picture and you'll see which country is the more fruitful despite what it's up against. (;

Person you are? Every single thread you post is pro-isreal anti-arab and for the most part condoning anything and everything israel does.

You show extreme bias and before you accuse anyone of anything you should have alook at your post history, in my opinion.

Avatar image for EasyStreet
EasyStreet

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 EasyStreet
Member since 2003 • 11672 Posts

You in the end when the ameircan empire goes broke will spell the end of the last euro-trash colony.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
Why is this thread filled with more personal attacks from other thread's debates than the content of links in the OP?
Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#25 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts
[QUOTE="mayceV"] so because 21 people were killed and the couple thousand (if even that) forcced into bomb shelters you say Isreal had the right to drop hundreds of bombs on civilians? health care facilities? really? come on now I can accept isreal defending itself that is perfectly reasonable. However the way theydo it is illeagal and immoral. Now what do you say to the massacre in jenin? what is the justification there?

Let me make one thing clear: I don't justify the death of civilians. All I'm saying is Israel obviously done something right if it stopped the end of countless rockets and it taught Hamas a huge lesson. As for Jenin, well again I'm not condoning civilians being killed but again Israeli was responding to attacks and it seems as though they again got to the root of the problem.
Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#26 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

Person you are? Every single thread you post is pro-isreal anti-arab and for the most part condoning anything and everything israel does.

You show extreme bias and before you accuse anyone of anything you should have alook at your post history, in my opinion.

tenaka2

Give me one example where I've said something as distasteful as that? Exactly, you can't.

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#27 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

You in the end when the ameircan empire goes broke will spell the end of the last euro-trash colony.

EasyStreet
Keep dreaming..
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#28 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
Why is this thread filled with more personal attacks from other thread's debates than the content of links in the OP? CreasianDevaili
I'm guessing its a more personal thing to the TC, I'm waitting for a reply. Also its funny, I'm thinking about showing him how his weekly "palestinians hamas and PLO are all evil" threads can go both ways, over here I'm plagued with news about Isreal bombing tunnels and what not killing 5 or so civilains every few days. Just recently actually Isreal dropped bombs and killed a man and injured 3, a week or so prior to that they killed another two bombing, and opened fire on protestors not even a week ago killing 6. strangley enough all of these are ignored and chpped up to collateral damage. Many people are willing to recognize Isreal has even more blood on thier hands than the infamous hamas and hezbullah do.
Avatar image for EasyStreet
EasyStreet

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 EasyStreet
Member since 2003 • 11672 Posts
[QUOTE="EasyStreet"]

You in the end when the ameircan empire goes broke will spell the end of the last euro-trash colony.

CannedWorms
Keep dreaming..

You might keep dreaming as well.
Avatar image for yellerbelly
yellerbelly

1008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 yellerbelly
Member since 2008 • 1008 Posts
When you state that Israel gets to the root of the problem with their attacks and massacres, it sure sounds like you are justfying attacks on civilians. And the sheer fact that this attack has happened is surely enough proof that their heavyhanded and dispropotionate responses is not the way for the region to find stability.
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#31 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
[QUOTE="mayceV"] so because 21 people were killed and the couple thousand (if even that) forcced into bomb shelters you say Isreal had the right to drop hundreds of bombs on civilians? health care facilities? really? come on now I can accept isreal defending itself that is perfectly reasonable. However the way theydo it is illeagal and immoral. Now what do you say to the massacre in jenin? what is the justification there?CannedWorms
Let me make one thing clear: I don't justify the death of civilians. All I'm saying is Israel obviously done something right if it stopped the end of countless rockets and it taught Hamas a huge lesson. As for Jenin, well again I'm not condoning civilians being killed but again Israeli was responding to attacks and it seems as though they again got to the root of the problem.

So why do you blindly defend Isreal to the death? do you atleast admit that they have lots of blood on thier hands? .
Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#32 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts
[QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="EasyStreet"]

You in the end when the ameircan empire goes broke will spell the end of the last euro-trash colony.

EasyStreet
Keep dreaming..

You might keep dreaming as well.

I don't need to dream though, that's the difference. You're presumption is grounded on no facts. Israel is here to stay, with or without America's $.
Avatar image for th3warr1or
th3warr1or

20637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#33 th3warr1or
Member since 2007 • 20637 Posts

You in the end when the ameircan empire goes broke will spell the end of the last euro-trash colony.

EasyStreet
Ok, thanks for your input.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#34 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"]They always come out fine in the end though. Something you hate to see. (;CannedWorms

Fine in the end eh? Tell that to the 7 dead jews. : D

Shows you up for the person you truely are. And if I was going to respond with an actual reply..then you are thinking small-scale. Look at the bigger picture and you'll see which country is the more fruitful despite what it's up against. (;

I love how you respond with incoherent zealous pro-israel babble whenever the validity of your propaganda is rendered void. (:

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#35 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts
[QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="mayceV"] so because 21 people were killed and the couple thousand (if even that) forcced into bomb shelters you say Isreal had the right to drop hundreds of bombs on civilians? health care facilities? really? come on now I can accept isreal defending itself that is perfectly reasonable. However the way theydo it is illeagal and immoral. Now what do you say to the massacre in jenin? what is the justification there?mayceV
Let me make one thing clear: I don't justify the death of civilians. All I'm saying is Israel obviously done something right if it stopped the end of countless rockets and it taught Hamas a huge lesson. As for Jenin, well again I'm not condoning civilians being killed but again Israeli was responding to attacks and it seems as though they again got to the root of the problem.

So why do you blindly defend Isreal to the death? do you atleast admit that they have lots of blood on thier hands? .

I will admit they have sometimes used excessive force when it was unnecessary, and a two-state solution is better than a one-state solution (for everyone involved).
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#36 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]Person you are? Every single thread you post is pro-isreal anti-arab and for the most part condoning anything and everything israel does.

You show extreme bias and before you accuse anyone of anything you should have alook at your post history, in my opinion.

CannedWorms

Give me one example where I've said something as distasteful as that? Exactly, you can't.

I can! : D Pick me, pick me!

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"]Why is this thread filled with more personal attacks from other thread's debates than the content of links in the OP? mayceV
I'm guessing its a more personal thing to the TC, I'm waitting for a reply. Also its funny, I'm thinking about showing him how his weekly "palestinians hamas and PLO are all evil" threads can go both ways, over here I'm plagued with news about Isreal bombing tunnels and what not killing 5 or so civilains every few days. Just recently actually Isreal dropped bombs and killed a man and injured 3, a week or so prior to that they killed another two bombing, and opened fire on protestors not even a week ago killing 6. strangley enough all of these are ignored and chpped up to collateral damage. Many people are willing to recognize Isreal has even more blood on thier hands than the infamous hamas and hezbullah do.

I sadly say that is a part of the bigger issue of people holding entire countries abroad totally responsible and for any and all military or harmful humanitarian efforts by default. I think in general the people without rockets or munitions are the ones who would really like for it all to stop from all sides. However I would also account that hamas or hezbullah are equal to the IDF in goals. The effects from them all are not equal, but that does not mean that the lesser bloody hand is only covered in less blood due to lack of equal resources. Least that is my view. Which also leads me to the maybe biased assumption that none of this will ever stop.

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#38 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
Sorry but uhhh if you support any military opperation like cast lead or what happened in Jenin simply due to the results, makes It hard to believe you dettest the killing of civilians jenin was a straigh up massacre nothing more nothing less, sure they killed 40 hamas officials however they killed so many civilains and destroyed the entire refugee camp and blew down houses knowing people were inside. don't believe the isreali hed count look at 3rd party ones such as.. the name escapes me but it was a british NGO that re affirmed that Jenin was indeed a massacre. So if you're against killing civilians then you should be horrified at isreal's responses to threats.
Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#39 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"]

Fine in the end eh? Tell that to the 7 dead jews. : D

BiancaDK

Shows you up for the person you truely are. And if I was going to respond with an actual reply..then you are thinking small-scale. Look at the bigger picture and you'll see which country is the more fruitful despite what it's up against. (;

I love how you respond with incoherent zealous pro-israel babble whenever the validity of your propaganda is rendered void. (:

It's no problem..but I only do that when I feel the need to retaliate to the delusional extreme left-wing wet-dream of something bad happening to Israel. (;
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"]Shows you up for the person you truely are. And if I was going to respond with an actual reply..then you are thinking small-scale. Look at the bigger picture and you'll see which country is the more fruitful despite what it's up against. (;CannedWorms

I love how you respond with incoherent zealous pro-israel babble whenever the validity of your propaganda is rendered void. (:

It's no problem..but I only do that when I feel the need to retaliate to the delusional extreme left-wing wet-dream of something bad happening to Israel. (;

I love how you respond with incoherent zealous pro-israel babble whenever the validity of your propaganda is rendered void. (:

Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#41 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

It's no problem..but I only do that when I feel the need to retaliate to the delusional extreme left-wing wet-dream of something bad happening to Israel. (;CannedWorms

Your rampant delusion has a pretty nifty self-defence mechanism, gotta' hand it to ya' : D

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#42 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
[QUOTE="mayceV"][QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"]Why is this thread filled with more personal attacks from other thread's debates than the content of links in the OP? CreasianDevaili
I'm guessing its a more personal thing to the TC, I'm waitting for a reply. Also its funny, I'm thinking about showing him how his weekly "palestinians hamas and PLO are all evil" threads can go both ways, over here I'm plagued with news about Isreal bombing tunnels and what not killing 5 or so civilains every few days. Just recently actually Isreal dropped bombs and killed a man and injured 3, a week or so prior to that they killed another two bombing, and opened fire on protestors not even a week ago killing 6. strangley enough all of these are ignored and chpped up to collateral damage. Many people are willing to recognize Isreal has even more blood on thier hands than the infamous hamas and hezbullah do.

I sadly say that is a part of the bigger issue of people holding entire countries abroad totally responsible and for any and all military or harmful humanitarian efforts by default. I think in general the people without rockets or munitions are the ones who would really like for it all to stop from all sides. However I would also account that haman or hezbullah are equal to the IDF in goals. The effects from them all are not equal, but that does not mean that the lesser bloody hand is only covered in less blood due to lack of equal resources. Least that is my view. Which also leads me to the maybe biased assumption that none of this will ever stop.

until Isreal is ready to actually bring a reasonable negotiation to the table nothing will ever progress, The first thing they need to do is stop settlement expansion. over 200 houses were green lit in settlements. How can you reasonably negotiate when one side is already helping themselves to the land you're negotiating?
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#43 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

I love how you respond with incoherent zealous pro-israel babble whenever the validity of your propaganda is rendered void. (:

tenaka2

I genuinely snickered. /love

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#44 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts
Sorry but uhhh if you support any military opperation like cast lead or what happened in Jenin simply due to the results, makes It hard to believe you dettest the killing of civilians jenin was a straigh up massacre nothing more nothing less, sure they killed 40 hamas officials however they killed so many civilains and destroyed the entire refugee camp and blew down houses knowing people were inside. don't believe the isreali hed count look at 3rd party ones such as.. the name escapes me but it was a british NGO that re affirmed that Jenin was indeed a massacre. So if you're against killing civilians then you should be horrified at isreal's responses to threats.mayceV
I support the reasoning behind the operations but not the 'collateral damage'. Two different things. I always look at '3rd party" sources, in that the figures I posted was from a third party source (Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center).
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

5 dead? That's nothing. In Detroit we call that "breakfast".

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#46 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"]It's no problem..but I only do that when I feel the need to retaliate to the delusional extreme left-wing wet-dream of something bad happening to Israel. (;BiancaDK

Your rampant delusion has a pretty nifty self-defence mechanism, gotta' hand it to ya' : D

Delusion..me? Nah. Self-defence? Maybe. (:
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="mayceV"] I'm guessing its a more personal thing to the TC, I'm waitting for a reply. Also its funny, I'm thinking about showing him how his weekly "palestinians hamas and PLO are all evil" threads can go both ways, over here I'm plagued with news about Isreal bombing tunnels and what not killing 5 or so civilains every few days. Just recently actually Isreal dropped bombs and killed a man and injured 3, a week or so prior to that they killed another two bombing, and opened fire on protestors not even a week ago killing 6. strangley enough all of these are ignored and chpped up to collateral damage. Many people are willing to recognize Isreal has even more blood on thier hands than the infamous hamas and hezbullah do.mayceV
I sadly say that is a part of the bigger issue of people holding entire countries abroad totally responsible and for any and all military or harmful humanitarian efforts by default. I think in general the people without rockets or munitions are the ones who would really like for it all to stop from all sides. However I would also account that haman or hezbullah are equal to the IDF in goals. The effects from them all are not equal, but that does not mean that the lesser bloody hand is only covered in less blood due to lack of equal resources. Least that is my view. Which also leads me to the maybe biased assumption that none of this will ever stop.

until Isreal is ready to actually bring a reasonable negotiation to the table nothing will ever progress, The first thing they need to do is stop settlement expansion. over 200 houses were green lit in settlements. How can you reasonably negotiate when one side is already helping themselves to the land you're negotiating?

So on the terms of pure goverment standings you do not think that all the sides do not have too much blood on their hands to shake and actually trust each other? Also that even if say hamas and Israel both did a genuine proceedings, that there isn't enough bad blood on both sides for an outside influence to easily refuel the fire? That is the problem. I do not think the sides are "ever" ready to talk genuine peace when all sides are. It seems when a hand there is extended it is bitten. Vice versa as well. For that.. there is blame but it is on both sides. But blame will not keep people from getting killed on both sides either who have never raised a weapon to the other.

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#48 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
[QUOTE="mayceV"]Sorry but uhhh if you support any military opperation like cast lead or what happened in Jenin simply due to the results, makes It hard to believe you dettest the killing of civilians jenin was a straigh up massacre nothing more nothing less, sure they killed 40 hamas officials however they killed so many civilains and destroyed the entire refugee camp and blew down houses knowing people were inside. don't believe the isreali hed count look at 3rd party ones such as.. the name escapes me but it was a british NGO that re affirmed that Jenin was indeed a massacre. So if you're against killing civilians then you should be horrified at isreal's responses to threats.CannedWorms
I support the reasoning behind the operations but not the 'collateral damage'. Two different things. I always look at '3rd party" sources, in that the figures I posted was from a third party source (Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center).

so you support the sentence" lets stop the terrorists."? good so do I and I'm pretty sure everyone in the world would. its the actions that are being argued and Isreal Isn't exactly a clean white lamb.Ok nice isreal wants to keep its state from being isolated overrun and what not, then hurry up and start the negotiation... the PLO stated if isreal was to halt settlement expansion then negotiations would be possible. but no it took half the world to pressure the PLO to go into negotiations ( currently overseen by tony blair I think) to negotiate with Isreal even if isreal is already helping themselves to what's being negotiated. these negotiations overseen by tony blair aren't even getting anywhere. After 20 years of failed negotiations I'm suprised the PLO didn't give up on ever comeing up with an agreement with isreal. Isreal is holding up everything and prolonging this occupation for God knows what reason. Not the PLO, Not hamas or extremists but isreal themselves, If they are willing to recognize that palestinians are indeed human beings then the problem is solved.
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#49 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts

[QUOTE="mayceV"][QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] I sadly say that is a part of the bigger issue of people holding entire countries abroad totally responsible and for any and all military or harmful humanitarian efforts by default. I think in general the people without rockets or munitions are the ones who would really like for it all to stop from all sides. However I would also account that haman or hezbullah are equal to the IDF in goals. The effects from them all are not equal, but that does not mean that the lesser bloody hand is only covered in less blood due to lack of equal resources. Least that is my view. Which also leads me to the maybe biased assumption that none of this will ever stop. CreasianDevaili

until Isreal is ready to actually bring a reasonable negotiation to the table nothing will ever progress, The first thing they need to do is stop settlement expansion. over 200 houses were green lit in settlements. How can you reasonably negotiate when one side is already helping themselves to the land you're negotiating?

So on the terms of pure goverment standings you do not think that all the sides do not have too much blood on their hands to shake and actually trust each other? Also that even if say hamas and Israel both did a genuine proceedings, that there isn't enough bad blood on both sides for an outside influence to easily refuel the fire? That is the problem. I do not think the sides are "ever" ready to talk genuine peace when all sides are. It seems when a hand there is extended it is bitten. Vice versa as well. For that.. there is blame but it is on both sides. But blame will not keep people from getting killed on both sides either who have never raised a weapon to the other.

I agree though, both sides are to blame and honestly I'm not even sure the PLO are really qualified to be the representitive ofthe palestian people. I mean if anything the PA have just shown that all they want is to create a little stat called palestine and were prepared at one point to give up East jeruslem, most of the west bank to do it. I'm not even sure I'd trust the PLO enough to do something in favor of the people or even solve any of the problems in the territories...atleast until i see how sept. 20th goes and what the PLO plans to do in terms of right of return and East Jeruslem.
Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#50 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

[QUOTE="CannedWorms"][QUOTE="mayceV"]Sorry but uhhh if you support any military opperation like cast lead or what happened in Jenin simply due to the results, makes It hard to believe you dettest the killing of civilians jenin was a straigh up massacre nothing more nothing less, sure they killed 40 hamas officials however they killed so many civilains and destroyed the entire refugee camp and blew down houses knowing people were inside. don't believe the isreali hed count look at 3rd party ones such as.. the name escapes me but it was a british NGO that re affirmed that Jenin was indeed a massacre. So if you're against killing civilians then you should be horrified at isreal's responses to threats.mayceV
I support the reasoning behind the operations but not the 'collateral damage'. Two different things. I always look at '3rd party" sources, in that the figures I posted was from a third party source (Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center).

so you support the sentence" lets stop the terrorists."? good so do I and I'm pretty sure everyone in the world would. its the actions that are being argued and Isreal Isn't exactly a clean white lamb.Ok nice isreal wants to keep its state from being isolated overrun and what not, then hurry up and start the negotiation... the PLO stated if isreal was to halt settlement expansion then negotiations would be possible. but no it took half the world to pressure the PLO to go into negotiations ( currently overseen by tony blair I think) to negotiate with Isreal even if isreal is already helping themselves to what's being negotiated. these negotiations overseen by tony blair aren't even getting anywhere. After 20 years of failed negotiations I'm suprised the PLO didn't give up on ever comeing up with an agreement with isreal. Isreal is holding up everything and prolonging this occupation for God knows what reason. Not the PLO, Not hamas or extremists but isreal themselves, If they are willing to recognize that palestinians are indeed human beings then the problem is solved.

Yes I do. And judging by your post I'm not sure you're aware that negotiations are DEFINITELY over. The PLO are going to the UN in September to get unilateral recognition of Palestine. And the only reason they are "prolonging the occupation" is because they don't want to give up East Jerusalem, Har Homa and a few other pieces of land (which I understand). They know there is no chance of the PLO willing to negotiate EJ and a few other stragetically important bits of land vital for Israel's security. If the PLO said they would be willing to give up EJ and strategic land I'm sure negotiations would be back on and they could reach a compromise.