Julius Caesar vs Sun Tzu

Julius Caesar:

VS

Sun Tzu

Who would lead their side to Victory and why?

Sun Tzu might not even have existed, so.Cherokee_Jack

Same with Julius Caesar

Sun Tzu because he is a badass. Also, he has a beard.

Genghis Khan is better than both in my opinion.

Look at how pissed off that face looks.

My money is on Tzu.

Genghis Khan in my opinion.

Look at how pissed off that face looks.

[QUOTE="Vesica_Prime"]

Genghis Khan in my opinion.

Look at how pissed off that face looks.

rockerbikie

There's no denying that Caesar was an excellent general but Genghis Khan was such an accomplished general that he managed to conquer all of China and controlled Subotai the only general to ever successfully conquer all of Russia.

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]Sun Tzu might not even have existed, so.UserBane

Same with Julius Caesar

I dunno Caesar was a very accomplished General.rockerbikie

Sun Tzu. Many of his teachings are still important and still widely used today. Even in business. Julius Caesar, not so much. But you can't pick two great people and say who would win. It all depends on details, their armies, the lay out of the land, their knowledge of the land, etc.Jaguar_Shade

[QUOTE="Jaguar_Shade"]Sun Tzu. Many of his teachings are still important and still widely used today. Even in business. Julius Caesar, not so much. But you can't pick two great people and say who would win. It all depends on details, their armies, the lay out of the land, their knowledge of the land, etc.SuperSaiyanLink

Chinese armies of that period would have been able to turn Roman armies into confetti, so Tzu'd obviously win.

[QUOTE="rockerbikie"]I dunno Caesar was a very accomplished General.Jaguar_Shade

Fear of a Bot Planet!!

Sun Tzu. Many of his teachings are still important and still widely used today. Even in business. Julius Caesar, not so much. But you can't pick two great people and say who would win. It all depends on details, their armies, the lay out of the land, their knowledge of the land, etc.Jaguar_Shade

[QUOTE="SuperSaiyanLink"]

[QUOTE="Jaguar_Shade"]Sun Tzu. Many of his teachings are still important and still widely used today. Even in business. Julius Caesar, not so much. But you can't pick two great people and say who would win. It all depends on details, their armies, the lay out of the land, their knowledge of the land, etc.Jaguar_Shade

[QUOTE="Jaguar_Shade"][QUOTE="SuperSaiyanLink"]Divide and conquer?

rockerbikie

Actually the principle of discpline in armies was based of Caesar.rockerbikie

Genghis Khan would be the man for the job. Sun Tzu may have written the book, but Genghis read it, thought it was rubbish, and rode all over them both with his mounted archers.

Or maybe Alexander the great would be the boy for the job....

this guy

Chinese had kung fu. th3warr1or

Sun Tzu...

Caesar's military career completely outshines Tzu's. Tzu's claim to fame is a book, and even fact has been called into question. limpbizkit818

Caeser. I don't know why.

&

lt;p>this guy

comp_atkins

Where and when.

I'm gonna go with Caesar, for no other reason than Caesar's works are not quoted all the time by idiots.

Since I know very little about the tactics and strategies of either individual (I read the Art of War a long time ago, but remember very little), then it is really impossible to say who would actually win if they were contemporary individuals. Considering Sun Tzu supposedly existed almost 500 years before Caesar, I'm going to have to say this is an impossible hypothetical, since militaristic technological means were neither similar between those periods or in those areas of the world.

Asian soldiers were generally more skilled and disciplined. Their tactics were superior to Romans in many of their battles. While Romans had sophisticated formations, the Asians did more than just Arrow Barrage --> Light Infantry charge --> Cavalry charge in skirmishes. Adam_the_Nerd

Your ignorance is astounding.

Asian soldiers were generally more skilled and disciplined. Their tactics were superior to Romans in many of their battles. While Romans had sophisticated formations, the Asians did more than just Arrow Barrage --> Light Infantry charge --> Cavalry charge in skirmishes. Adam_the_Nerd

I'll be more polite about it than the other guy: Where are you getting this information?