I was a Obama supporter but....

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Dub_c6969
Dub_c6969

6014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Dub_c6969
Member since 2004 • 6014 Posts

Yes I voted for Obama and I was behind him 100% because I wanted change. Everything people said about him I ignored, people said he was a radical, a socialist etc etc...

Why I changed my views you might ask, The dude is a BULLY know doubt about it. If you don't like it you can kiss his ass and he is going to push whatever bill he wants through and that's just that.

He is not for the peoples agendas, he is doing things hes way/his agenda and I'm not going to lie, I did not see it when he was running for President but now sitting back and watching him you can clearly see that he is a bully.

I am not saying this to gain support from you guys (I don't care which side you take) or saying that I am for the Republicans agenda but plain and simple I think the dude is a horrible President and I don't see him getting a second term in the White House.

One more thing is that I think that black people ignore that he is a bad president "only" because he is black (Im black BTW know racism im just saying) and that what ever he does is ok. Yes it is cool to have a black President because it has shown how far America and blacks have come but I honestly think he is letting that go to his head.

I honestly think Obama made a big mistake or that he is going to make a HUGH mistake in the future and something is going to take place. Hopefully its not too bad.

Just wanted to make this short and quick, I suck at grammar obviously but I hope you get what I'm saying.........

Avatar image for metallica_fan42
metallica_fan42

21143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#2 metallica_fan42
Member since 2006 • 21143 Posts
It's politics, they lie. Not much you can do, it's how it's always been.
Avatar image for MystikFollower
MystikFollower

4061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 MystikFollower
Member since 2009 • 4061 Posts

Well, when you have an entire party gridlocking you so you can't push ANY legislation through, and you're supposed to be a president of "Change", then of course things are going to get nasty.

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

yesterday, this lady in my geography class said he was satan. then the man she was talking to said he think's he's the anti-christ.

Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

I get what you're saying. I never voted for Obama :D, but I know plenty of people who did and many of them now regret their decision. His campaign was basically a lie.

I hope that he gets thrown out in 2012. I would love to see the reaction if that were to happen :evil:

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
Vague character generalisations don't have much substance really. I prefer to evaluate politicians based on their policies. Simply because they are so subjective.
Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

Well, when you have an entire party gridlocking you so you can't push ANY legislation through, and you're supposed to be a president of "Change", then of course things are going to get nasty.

MystikFollower

Well, the legislation is awful.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

I get what you're saying. I never voted for Obama :D, but I know plenty of people who did and many of them now regret their decision. His campaign was basically a lie.

I hope that he gets thrown out in 2012. I would love to see the reaction if that were to happen :evil:

dkrustyklown
See, this is what I have trouble comprehending. In what sense was his campaign a lie? Based on policy, Obama has kept the vast majority of his promises so far. You might disagree with the policies he has pursued, or complain he isn't addressing many promises quickly enough, but from a policy standpoint, he has kept the majority of his promises.
Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

Obama is actually very weak. Not only did he drop the public option and give into the Repubs on a bunch of ther things, I don't even think he got a single Republican vote. He's not a bully, he's the opposite. He always gives in to the republicans too much.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
he, bush(2) and any other stimulus backing president should be shot out of a cannon into the sun
Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

Yes I voted for Obama and I was behind him 100% because I wanted change. Everything people said about him I ignored, people said he was a radical, a socialist etc etc...

Why I changed my views you might ask, The dude is a BULLY know doubt about it. If you don't like it you can kiss hes ass and he is going to push whatever bill he wants through and that's just that.

He is not for the peoples agendas, he is doing things hes way/hes agenda and I'm not going to lie, I did not see it when he was running for President but now sitting back and watching him you can clearly see that he is a bully.

I am not saying this to gain support from you guys (I don't care which side you take) or saying that I am for the Republicans agenda but plain and simple I think the dude is a horrible President and I don't see him getting a second term in the White House.

One more thing is that I think that black people ignore that he is a bad president "only" because he is black (Im black BTW know racism im just saying) and that what ever he does is ok. Yes it is cool to have a black President because it has shown how far America and blacks have come but I honestly think he is letting that go to hes head.

I honestly think Obama made a big mistake or that he is going to make a HUGH mistake in the future and something is going to take place. Hopefully its not too bad.

Just wanted to make this short and quick, I suck at grammar obviously but I hope you get what I'm saying.........

Dub_c6969

Obama's as white as he is black.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

Well, when you have an entire party gridlocking you so you can't push ANY legislation through, and you're supposed to be a president of "Change", then of course things are going to get nasty.

MystikFollower
the other party cant gridlock, its like trying to stop a five lane highway with a powerwheels, it just cant happen.
Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts

Thats politics...he has his political agenda and he will do what he needs to within the law also blacks overwhelmingly vote democrat...skin colour aside

Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

[QUOTE="MystikFollower"]

Well, when you have an entire party gridlocking you so you can't push ANY legislation through, and you're supposed to be a president of "Change", then of course things are going to get nasty.

surrealnumber5

the other party cant gridlock, its like trying to stop a five lane highway with a powerwheels, it just cant happen.

What are you talking about? The Republicans try to hold up EVERYTHING and they succeeded for a year or so with Healthcare. And in the end we got a crappy watered down bill and no Republican votes.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

yesterday, this lady in my geography class said he was satan. then the man she was talking to said he think's he's the anti-christ.

needled24-7
i would ask for proof but i have seen some raise him to savior and others do the anti-christ thing, both sides are idiots as is barry when it comes to economics
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#16 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

What exactly is Obama supposed to do? The Republicans basically made it clear that they wanted health care reform to be his "Waterloo" and that they would oppose anything, regardless of what it was. Before passage of the bill in the Senate, 721 amendments had been proposed by Republicans, 161 of which passed and were included in the bill. The idea that the Democrats shut out the Republicans is just total nonsense - no offense. The Republicans shut themselves out. The Democrats were just working with what they had available.

Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

See, this is what I have trouble comprehending. In what sense was his campaign a lie? Based on policy, Obama has kept the vast majority of his promises so far. You might disagree with the policies he has pursued, or complain he isn't addressing many promises quickly enough, but from a policy standpoint, he has kept the majority of his promises.Danm_999

Firstly, during the campaign, he emphatically rejected the notion of an individual health insurance mandate. He blasted Hillary Clinton throughout the primaries on the subject.

Secondly, he stated that no one making less than $250k/year would see any tax increases, yet the healthcare bill raised taxes that many people making less than $250k/year will have to pay. Now you have his chief economic adviser publicly mulling a VAT tax that would hit anyone that purchases anything.

Thirdly, he promised that the Health Care bill would be crafted tranparently and in full view of CSPAN cameras. All we the people got to see, however, were the floor debates that happened after the bill was written up. The actual writing of the bill, with input from committees, insurance companies, medical associations, pharmaceutical companies, and stockbrokers was done behind closed doors. There was nothing transparent about the process. I want to know exactly what kind of input big pharma and Blue Cross had in crafting the legislation. As it stands, we will never know.

Those are three massive lies, and people need to call him on them.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#18 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="MystikFollower"]

Well, when you have an entire party gridlocking you so you can't push ANY legislation through, and you're supposed to be a president of "Change", then of course things are going to get nasty.

surrealnumber5

the other party cant gridlock, its like trying to stop a five lane highway with a powerwheels, it just cant happen.

Well there's this thing called the filibuster. :P

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="MystikFollower"]

Well, when you have an entire party gridlocking you so you can't push ANY legislation through, and you're supposed to be a president of "Change", then of course things are going to get nasty.

SgtKevali

the other party cant gridlock, its like trying to stop a five lane highway with a powerwheels, it just cant happen.

What are you talking about? The Republicans try to hold up EVERYTHING and they succeeded for a year or so with Healthcare. And in the end we got a crappy watered down bill and no Republican votes.

the bipartisan support was not for but against the bill, because it was bad. if all of the dems voted the same way there is nothing the reps could do about it..... well scott changed that THIS YEAR. just because the bipartisan support was against it does not mean it was being gridlocked by one party, it was being held up by both parties
Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

he, bush(2) and any other stimulus backing president should be shot out of a cannon into the sunsurrealnumber5

I agree.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="MystikFollower"]

Well, when you have an entire party gridlocking you so you can't push ANY legislation through, and you're supposed to be a president of "Change", then of course things are going to get nasty.

GabuEx

the other party cant gridlock, its like trying to stop a five lane highway with a powerwheels, it just cant happen.

Well there's this thing called the filibuster. :P

not with the super majority

edit: or is it supra majority? dont feel like looking it up

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="needled24-7"]

yesterday, this lady in my geography class said he was satan. then the man she was talking to said he think's he's the anti-christ.

surrealnumber5

i would ask for proof but i have seen some raise him to savior and others do the anti-christ thing, both sides are idiots as is barry when it comes to economics

Oh let me guess, you think he's an idiot because he supports Keynesian policies? :roll:

Anyway, I voted for him and right now I have every intention of voting for him again in 2012.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"] See, this is what I have trouble comprehending. In what sense was his campaign a lie? Based on policy, Obama has kept the vast majority of his promises so far. You might disagree with the policies he has pursued, or complain he isn't addressing many promises quickly enough, but from a policy standpoint, he has kept the majority of his promises.dkrustyklown

Firstly, during the campaign, he emphatically rejected the notion of an individual health insurance mandate. He blasted Hillary Clinton throughout the primaries on the subject.

Secondly, he stated that no one making less than $250k/year would see any tax increases, yet the healthcare bill raised taxes that many people making less than $250k/year will have to pay. Now you have his chief economic adviser publicly mulling a VAT tax that would hit anyone that purchases anything.

Thirdly, he promised that the Health Care bill would be crafted tranparently and in full view of CSPAN cameras. All we the people got to see, however, were the floor debates that happened after the bill was written up. The actual writing of the bill, with input from committees, insurance companies, medical associations, pharmaceutical companies, and stockbrokers was done behind closed doors. There was nothing transparent about the process. I want to know exactly what kind of input big pharma and Blue Cross had in crafting the legislation. As it stands, we will never know.

Those are three massive lies, and people need to call him on them.



Of course he's broken promises. All politicians do that. They do that even if they 100% intend to follow through when they initially lie.

However, as I also said, he has thus far kept the majority of campaign promises, almost 10 times more promises have been honoured or are in the works than broken according to Politifact; which tracks campaign promises and gives them ratings based on his completion.

So when people call his campaign a big lie, when he has kept vastly more promises than he's broken, it seems out of touch with reality.

Avatar image for Dub_c6969
Dub_c6969

6014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Dub_c6969
Member since 2004 • 6014 Posts

[QUOTE="Dub_c6969"]

Yes I voted for Obama and I was behind him 100% because I wanted change. Everything people said about him I ignored, people said he was a radical, a socialist etc etc...

Why I changed my views you might ask, The dude is a BULLY know doubt about it. If you don't like it you can kiss hes ass and he is going to push whatever bill he wants through and that's just that.

He is not for the peoples agendas, he is doing things hes way/hes agenda and I'm not going to lie, I did not see it when he was running for President but now sitting back and watching him you can clearly see that he is a bully.

I am not saying this to gain support from you guys (I don't care which side you take) or saying that I am for the Republicans agenda but plain and simple I think the dude is a horrible President and I don't see him getting a second term in the White House.

One more thing is that I think that black people ignore that he is a bad president "only" because he is black (Im black BTW know racism im just saying) and that what ever he does is ok. Yes it is cool to have a black President because it has shown how far America and blacks have come but I honestly think he is letting that go to hes head.

I honestly think Obama made a big mistake or that he is going to make a HUGH mistake in the future and something is going to take place. Hopefully its not too bad.

Just wanted to make this short and quick, I suck at grammar obviously but I hope you get what I'm saying.........

SgtKevali

Obama's as white as he is black.

HA... I wish most people thought like you......
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#25 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Firstly, during the campaign, he emphatically rejected the notion of an individual health insurance mandate. He blasted Hillary Clinton throughout the primaries on the subject.

Secondly, he stated that no one making less than $250k/year would see any tax increases, yet the healthcare bill raised taxes that many people making less than $250k/year will have to pay. Now you have his chief economic adviser publicly mulling a VAT tax that would hit anyone that purchases anything.

Thirdly, he promised that the Health Care bill would be crafted tranparently and in full view of CSPAN cameras. All we the people got to see, however, were the floor debates that happened after the bill was written up. The actual writing of the bill, with input from committees, insurance companies, medical associations, pharmaceutical companies, and stockbrokers was done behind closed doors. There was nothing transparent about the process. I want to know exactly what kind of input big pharma and Blue Cross had in crafting the legislation. As it stands, we will never know.

Those are three massive lies, and people need to call him on them.

dkrustyklown

In total, thus far, he has broken 19 promises, kept 109, and reached a compromise on an additional 34. If we count the latter group as 0.5 of a promise kept, that means that thus far he has kept 78% of the promises which have reached a conclusion one way or another. Now, of course, that's not 100% (only one president in history has ever kept 100% of his promises), and he should rightly be called on the promises that he has broken, but acting as though his entire campaign was one big lie is just, well, wrong. The vast majority of what he said he was going to do he either did or is in the process of doing.

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts

[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

[QUOTE="Dub_c6969"]

Yes I voted for Obama and I was behind him 100% because I wanted change. Everything people said about him I ignored, people said he was a radical, a socialist etc etc...

Why I changed my views you might ask, The dude is a BULLY know doubt about it. If you don't like it you can kiss hes ass and he is going to push whatever bill he wants through and that's just that.

He is not for the peoples agendas, he is doing things hes way/hes agenda and I'm not going to lie, I did not see it when he was running for President but now sitting back and watching him you can clearly see that he is a bully.

I am not saying this to gain support from you guys (I don't care which side you take) or saying that I am for the Republicans agenda but plain and simple I think the dude is a horrible President and I don't see him getting a second term in the White House.

One more thing is that I think that black people ignore that he is a bad president "only" because he is black (Im black BTW know racism im just saying) and that what ever he does is ok. Yes it is cool to have a black President because it has shown how far America and blacks have come but I honestly think he is letting that go to hes head.

I honestly think Obama made a big mistake or that he is going to make a HUGH mistake in the future and something is going to take place. Hopefully its not too bad.

Just wanted to make this short and quick, I suck at grammar obviously but I hope you get what I'm saying.........

Dub_c6969

Obama's as white as he is black.

HA... I wish most people thought like you......

in America if you are half black you are black... you are accepted in the black community which cant be said about the white community

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="needled24-7"]

yesterday, this lady in my geography class said he was satan. then the man she was talking to said he think's he's the anti-christ.

chessmaster1989

i would ask for proof but i have seen some raise him to savior and others do the anti-christ thing, both sides are idiots as is barry when it comes to economics

Oh let me guess, you think he's an idiot because he supports Keynesian policies? :roll:

Anyway, I voted for him and right now I have every intention of voting for him again in 2012.

yes, thats just it. John Maynard Keynes was wrong and every time his system is tried to any large degree it fails
Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] the other party cant gridlock, its like trying to stop a five lane highway with a powerwheels, it just cant happen. surrealnumber5

What are you talking about? The Republicans try to hold up EVERYTHING and they succeeded for a year or so with Healthcare. And in the end we got a crappy watered down bill and no Republican votes.

the bipartisan support was not for but against the bill, because it was bad. if all of the dems voted the same way there is nothing the reps could do about it..... well scott changed that THIS YEAR. just because the bipartisan support was against it does not mean it was being gridlocked by one party, it was being held up by both parties

The bill got bad when the corporatists in the Congress got their hands on it.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#29 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

not with the super majority

surrealnumber5

The supermajority that they don't have?

Avatar image for muller39
muller39

14953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 muller39
Member since 2008 • 14953 Posts

I'm Canadian so I'll stick to being neutral.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

not with the super majority

GabuEx

The supermajority that they don't have?

they did, last year before scott brown
Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

Of course he's broken promises. All politicians do that. They do that even if they 100% intend to follow through when they initially lie.

However, as I also said, he has thus far kept the majority of campaign promises, almost 10 times more promises have been honoured than broken according to Politifact; which tracks campaign promises and gives them ratings based on his completion.

So when people call his campaign a big lie, when he has kept vastly more promises than he's broken, it seems out of touch with reality.

Danm_999

How many promises are kept vs how many are broken is completely irrelevant to an individual that thinks that one of the broken promises is important. To that person, Obama is a liar. A person that cares about a specific, broken promise may not care about the promises that are kept. It's not a points game. A single broken promise turns a campaign into a lie to a person that really cares about that specific promise.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#33 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

not with the super majority

surrealnumber5

The supermajority that they don't have?

they did, last year before scott brown

In name only. Having a D beside your name does not dictate 100% of your votes. The difference between 59 and 60 senators of one party is wildly overblown.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="SgtKevali"] What are you talking about? The Republicans try to hold up EVERYTHING and they succeeded for a year or so with Healthcare. And in the end we got a crappy watered down bill and no Republican votes.

SgtKevali

the bipartisan support was not for but against the bill, because it was bad. if all of the dems voted the same way there is nothing the reps could do about it..... well scott changed that THIS YEAR. just because the bipartisan support was against it does not mean it was being gridlocked by one party, it was being held up by both parties

The bill got bad when the corporatists in the Congress got their hands on it.

it was never good and its still bad. the only good health care reform the fed can do would be to open up cross state bidding for coverage using the UCC.... that and tort reform
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#35 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"]

Of course he's broken promises. All politicians do that. They do that even if they 100% intend to follow through when they initially lie.

However, as I also said, he has thus far kept the majority of campaign promises, almost 10 times more promises have been honoured than broken according to Politifact; which tracks campaign promises and gives them ratings based on his completion.

So when people call his campaign a big lie, when he has kept vastly more promises than he's broken, it seems out of touch with reality.

dkrustyklown

How many promises are kept vs how many are broken is completely irrelevant to an individual that thinks that one of the broken promises is important. To that person, Obama is a liar. A person that cares about a specific, broken promise may not care about the promises that are kept. It's not a points game. A single broken promise turns a campaign into a lie to a person that really cares about that specific promise.

Saying that a given person feels betrayed by Obama over one single promise is a vastly different claim than that his campaign as a whole was unqualifiedly a lie. That implies that he has broken all or the vast majority of his promises, which is untrue.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"]

Of course he's broken promises. All politicians do that. They do that even if they 100% intend to follow through when they initially lie.

However, as I also said, he has thus far kept the majority of campaign promises, almost 10 times more promises have been honoured than broken according to Politifact; which tracks campaign promises and gives them ratings based on his completion.

So when people call his campaign a big lie, when he has kept vastly more promises than he's broken, it seems out of touch with reality.

dkrustyklown

How many promises are kept vs how many are broken is completely irrelevant to an individual that thinks that one of the broken promises is important. To that person, Obama is a liar. A person that cares about a specific, broken promise may not care about the promises that are kept. It's not a points game. A single broken promise turns a campaign into a lie to a person that really cares about that specific promise.

So then you're basically admitting this isn't a rational or objective view of a candidate's integrity, but a perception thing?

Is there any campaign by that benchmark that cannot be called a lie? If the intent of your original post was to point out all politicians lie, then kudos, but that's not really a reason to specifically target one man, is it?

I'm sorry, but do you actually believe there will ever be a candidate who keeps 100% of their campaign promises? Do we even want that? Do we want politicians shackled to pre-election promises years down the line stopping them from acting in a particular way?

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#37 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

I'm sorry, but do you actually believe there will ever be a candidate who keeps 100% of their campaign promises?

Danm_999

James Polk, for the record. :P

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]

The supermajority that they don't have?

GabuEx

they did, last year before scott brown

In name only. Having a D beside your name does not dictate 100% of your votes. The difference between 59 and 60 senators of one party is wildly overblown.

i dont stand by either party, the only thing i care about is the market place and my personal freedoms. if some democrats voted with the republicans against a bill and it was ran through it seems like one party charging full speed with out the full support of its body and despite the other
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
I don't think republicans would have been any better, in fact I think they would have been worse. Presidents don't have a lot of power it all falls on the influencial people they surround themselves with and the congress/senate. Obama could have had good intentions but I guess he realized that, really, it isn't up to him.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#40 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"]

I'm sorry, but do you actually believe there will ever be a candidate who keeps 100% of their campaign promises?

GabuEx

James Polk, for the record. :P

Wow, did not know that one. I was aware Polk was one of the underrated performers, but to actually have 100% promises kept.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"]

I'm sorry, but do you actually believe there will ever be a candidate who keeps 100% of their campaign promises?

GabuEx

James Polk, for the record. :P

ron paul.... this being the net i had to do it
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#42 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

i dont stand by either party, the only thing i care about is the market place and my personal freedoms. if some democrats voted with the republicans against a bill and it was ran through it seems like one party charging full speed with out the full support of its body and despite the other surrealnumber5

I don't see how it can be claimed that this was "ran through" and that they were "charging full speed" when it took over a year from start to finish to get this single bill passed in both chambers of Congress...

Avatar image for Tauruslink
Tauruslink

6586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Tauruslink
Member since 2005 • 6586 Posts

Nah I have to disagree. In regards to the healthcare bill, I literally saw how Obama went from wanting to work with the Republicans, to the Republicans not wanting to compromise at all, to Obama simply having to move on without them. He promised healthcare reforme and now he has done it. I don't know why people are upset because a president is actually going through with his campaign promises. :?

Avatar image for njean777
njean777

3807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 njean777
Member since 2007 • 3807 Posts

well until we get rid of this party bull crap then maybe we can have a good president, until then, we are gonna have crappy ones that push their parties agenda regardless of whats good for the american people.

Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#45 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts

He's not doing a bad job for only being in a year.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#46 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="Danm_999"]

I'm sorry, but do you actually believe there will ever be a candidate who keeps 100% of their campaign promises?

Danm_999

James Polk, for the record. :P

Wow, did not know that one. I was aware Polk was one of the underrated performers, but to actually have 100% promises kept.

Well he didn't promise much, having only four main points of policy. He achieved them all in his four years as president, however, and consequently did not seek another term, as he did not see what purpose it would serve when he had done what he came to do.

Easily one of the most principled presidents on account of that, really.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#47 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]i dont stand by either party, the only thing i care about is the market place and my personal freedoms. if some democrats voted with the republicans against a bill and it was ran through it seems like one party charging full speed with out the full support of its body and despite the other GabuEx

I don't see how it can be claimed that this was "ran through" and that they were "charging full speed" when it took over a year from start to finish to get this single bill passed in both chambers of Congress...

I thought Republicans were a bit two faced on that front. They essentially refused to negotiate at all on the bill (Frum's comment they wanted it to be Obama's Waterloo) then complained when Democratic supporters stopped courting them and continued on their own.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]i dont stand by either party, the only thing i care about is the market place and my personal freedoms. if some democrats voted with the republicans against a bill and it was ran through it seems like one party charging full speed with out the full support of its body and despite the other GabuEx

I don't see how it can be claimed that this was "ran through" and that they were "charging full speed" when it took over a year from start to finish to get this single bill passed in both chambers of Congress...

im not going to do any hypothetical situations, but it took that long because both houses wanted their own bill passed, once kennedy died there was only one bill that could be passed, and it did not long after
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#49 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

I thought Republicans were a bit two faced on that front. They essentially refused to negotiate at all on the bill (Frum's comment they wanted it to be Obama's Waterloo) then complained when Democratic supporters stopped courting them and continued on their own.Danm_999

Well considering that they're now boldly declaring that the current financial reform bill, whose purpose is to prevent the need for bailouts, is a bailout, I think it's becoming increasingly clear that they will say anything at all as long as they feel it will gain them an iota of public support.

Avatar image for fidosim
fidosim

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#50 fidosim
Member since 2003 • 12901 Posts
I don't think he's a bully so much as he's just very insecure. He is soft-skinned and doesn't tolerate criticism very well at all, and it shows, despite his "cool and collected" image.