@Aljosa23:
1) Well, rich people aren't receiving welfare.
2) They were giving money to people who passed the tests, which I think it's unnecessary...that boosts the costs a lot, but with such a low rate of drug users (assuming it's even moderately accurate) the need for tests does seem ridiculous.
3) True, although I'm thinking some of them will starve anyway; when you're using money for drugs when you can't afford food you're either counting on the government to feed you or you just see it as more money for drugs.
4) Seems like an excellent idea, to be honest. If only that could be monitored without major costs...
4 seems a bit crazy to me. I could see limiting how much money for food stamps could be used to buy junk food (maybe say $50 a month) or having food stamps be actually stamps that pay for specific items (gallon of milk, dozen eggs, etc.), but I don't think food stamps should exclude people who eat unhealthy. There's a difference between testing someone for coke and testing someone for Coke.
Log in to comment