I keep hearing from people when I talk to them about religion that reason cannot be used against faith.
Well why not?
Why can't reason be used to explore and question faith? It seems to me to be a cop out to say that faith is untouchable by trying to use reason to better understand it. That faith is untouchable, that the one aspect that seems most important in life is inscrutable to logic. Everything we better understand about our world around has been from reason and logic.
If we are to attribute everything to faith that we don't understand, why don't we just go back and live in the middle ages and believe that objects fall to the ground because they "desire" to do so?
To relegate all that we don't understand to belief without first trying to apply what we as a species have learned and discovered seems, as awkward as it may sound, like an insult to faith and seems to minimize its importance.
Thoughts?
P. S.- This is NOT meant as a "disprove or prove God" thread. I'm just having trouble understanding why faith is above and beyond the realm of understanding, especially when something like the Bible is clearly understood by reason and held as evidence of God.......and a reason for faith.
Log in to comment