Explosion at Iran Nuclear facility

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15960456

I'm suprised there was no news on this, appearently there was an Expolsion at another facility on the 12 of November also.

did Achmed drop the plutonium rods again? :P

Well then, Iranian nuclear problem solved?

did Achmed drop the plutonium rods again? :P

wis3boi

Well then, Iranian nuclear problem solved?

worlock77

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Well then, Iranian nuclear problem solved?

wis3boi

[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Well then, Iranian nuclear problem solved?

Engrish_Major

[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Well then, Iranian nuclear problem solved?

Engrish_Major

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Well then, Iranian nuclear problem solved?

wis3boi

You should stick to the anime-jerking. Irans missile force is formidable, the first place it'll strike will be US troops in Iraq. They have air-defences Iraq only had wet-dreams about. This is what happens when Russia and China invest in their oil-partner. Besides, who is truly stupid enough to believe the 'duh got duh WMD' chestnut twice inside one decade?

[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Well then, Iranian nuclear problem solved?

roadkill88

You should stick to the anime-jerking. Irans missile force is formidable, the first place it'll strike will be US troops in Iraq. They have air-defences Iraq only had wet-dreams about. This is what happens when Russia and China invest in their oil-partner. Besides, who is truly stupid enough to believe the 'duh got duh WMD' chestnut twice inside one decade?

[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Well then, Iranian nuclear problem solved?

Engrish_Major

[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"] i think the chances of them blowing themselves up is higher than a missile of theirs getting enough airtime to leave the countryEngrish_Major

You should stick to the anime-jerking. Irans missile force is formidable, the first place it'll strike will be US troops in Iraq. They have air-defences Iraq only had wet-dreams about. This is what happens when Russia and China invest in their oil-partner. Besides, who is truly stupid enough to believe the 'duh got duh WMD' chestnut twice inside one decade?

There are 50,000 US Troops in Iraq, untill December 31st 2011. This is what happens people rely on kleptocratic media to inform them on what goes on around the world. Here's something else they won't tell you: Iran has an MRBM of North-Korean/Chinese developed, highly accurate MRBM's, over 1,000 of that variant alone scattered throughout their Country. A constant signal is sent to them from their high-value targets (E.g. nuclear reactors). Once that signal is interupted, i.e. the reactor is destroyed, the missiles will launch within miliseconds and pre-determined targets. These are missiles that can't be shot down, as the Patriot System has proven itself incapable of shooting down inferior missiles. They can't be bombed because only the Iranians know where they are. The targets will be the Israeli town of Dimona, US troops in Afghanistan, Saudi oil wells and Kuwaiti oil wells.

That is just the first thing Iran will do. Nodong medium range ballistic missiles have a range, payload and accuracy as well as speed that make Saddams SCUD's look like zulu spears.

There are 50,000 US Troops in Iraq, untill December 31st 2011. This is what happens people rely on kleptocratic media to inform them on what goes on around the world. Here's something else they won't tell you: Iran has an MRBM of North-Korean/Chinese developed, highly accurate MRBM's, over 1,000 of that variant alone scattered throughout their Country. A constant signal is sent to them from their high-value targets (E.g. nuclear reactors). Once that signal is interupted, i.e. the reactor is destroyed, the missiles will launch within miliseconds and pre-determined targets. These are missiles that can't be shot down, as the Patriot System has proven itself incapable of shooting down inferior missiles. They can't be bombed because only the Iranians know where they are. The targets will be the Israeli town of Dimona, US troops in Afghanistan, Saudi oil wells and Kuwaiti oil wells.

That is just the first thing Iran will do. Nodong medium range ballistic missiles have a range, payload and accuracy as well as speed that make Saddams SCUD's look like zulu spears.

roadkill88

[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

There are 50,000 US Troops in Iraq, untill December 31st 2011. This is what happens people rely on kleptocratic media to inform them on what goes on around the world. Here's something else they won't tell you: Iran has an MRBM of North-Korean/Chinese developed, highly accurate MRBM's, over 1,000 of that variant alone scattered throughout their Country. A constant signal is sent to them from their high-value targets (E.g. nuclear reactors). Once that signal is interupted, i.e. the reactor is destroyed, the missiles will launch within miliseconds and pre-determined targets. These are missiles that can't be shot down, as the Patriot System has proven itself incapable of shooting down inferior missiles. They can't be bombed because only the Iranians know where they are. The targets will be the Israeli town of Dimona, US troops in Afghanistan, Saudi oil wells and Kuwaiti oil wells.

That is just the first thing Iran will do. Nodong medium range ballistic missiles have a range, payload and accuracy as well as speed that make Saddams SCUD's look like zulu spears.

Engrish_Major

13,000 troops including tens of thousand of US contractors, workers and diplomats. The US also has bases in Kuwait, all over Afghanistan and Diego Garcia. Irans missiles can reach Israels nuclear reactor at Dimona. You can bet your bottom dollar, the Taliban will give Tehran GPS co-ordinates right down to the square inch of US troops. And you'd better believe that China has armed Iran with the weaponry to hit a bug from 1,000 miles. Nuclear waste will contaminate the shipping lanes of 40% of the Worlds oil traffic via Bushehr, at the other end Iran will close Hormuz - again with the weapons China and Russia have given them for the explicit purpose of doing so.

This will continue indefinitely, MRBM harrassment and proxy-attacks and the only way to stop it will be to invade Tehran. This is not feasible, it would require an unprecedented coalition. A draft. Assuming the USA had an economy strong enough to invade Iran, it would require a draft. I hope your excitment carries over to giger counting and dodging bullets in the real.

3rd one in short time. Mossad is at it again.

13,000 troops including tens of thousand of US contractors, workers and diplomats. The US also has bases in Kuwait, all over Afghanistan and Diego Garcia. Irans missiles can reach Israels nuclear reactor at Dimona. You can bet your bottom dollar, the Taliban will give Tehran GPS co-ordinates right down to the square inch of US troops. And you'd better believe that China has armed Iran with the weaponry to hit a bug from 1,000 miles. Nuclear waste will contaminate the shipping lanes of 40% of the Worlds oil traffic via Bushehr, at the other end Iran will close Hormuz - again with the weapons China and Russia have given them for the explicit purpose of doing so.

This will continue indefinitely, MRBM harrassment and proxy-attacks and the only way to stop it will be to invade Tehran. This is not feasible, it would require an unprecedented coalition. A draft. Assuming the USA had an economy strong enough to invade Iran, it would require a draft. I hope your excitment carries over to giger counting and dodging bullets in the real.

roadkill88

I didnt know Homer Simpson worked in Iran.

A new nuclear power touting their ability to destroy targets of their enemies with missiles... so original Iran! Launching only ONE nuke into another country is more than enough to turn the entire world against them... are they really that dumb? Well perhaps they are - if you are correct in your statement that the missiles fire automatically if a signal is interrupted from another site. You are saying that hundreds of nuclear warheads will fire if there is a signal interruption from somewhere else in the country? So, if there's a power outage, or someone makes a mistake, or some other random occurrence (and communications signals are interrupted all the time), then a nuclear war is automatically sparked? Brilliant!!Engrish_Major

I think he means those missiles are conventional. But who knows, I stopped reading when I saw him mention the draft.

A new nuclear power touting their ability to destroy targets of their enemies with missiles... so original Iran!Engrish_Major

You're insinuatin Iran is threatening to destroy people with MRBM capable nukes. Iran does not have the technology to outfit an MRBM with a nuke.

Launching only ONE nuke into another country is more than enough to turn the entire world against them... are they really that dumb?Engrish_Major

Ugh.

1) They don't have nukes.

2) They haven't threatened anyone, they promised a response with conventional MRBM's if they're attacked

Well perhaps they are - if you are correct in your statement that the missiles fire automatically if a signal is interrupted from another site. You are saying that hundreds of nuclear warheads will fire if there is a signal interruption from somewhere else in the country?Engrish_Major

LOL, 'hundreds of nuclear warheads'. No, I didn't say that.

So, if there's a power outage, or someone makes a mistake, or some other random occurrence (and communications signals are interrupted all the time), then a nuclear war is automatically sparked? Brilliant!!Engrish_Major

1) They do not have nuclear warheads

2) There are contingencies against accidents. These are not rudimentary Iraqi missiles, they're heavily programmable asian current-gen missiles

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"] A new nuclear power touting their ability to destroy targets of their enemies with missiles... so original Iran!roadkill88

You're insinuatin Iran is threatening to destroy people with MRBM capable nukes. Iran does not have the technology to outfit an MRBM with a nuke.

Launching only ONE nuke into another country is more than enough to turn the entire world against them... are they really that dumb?Engrish_Major

Ugh.

1) They don't have nukes.

2) They haven't threatened anyone, they promised a response with conventional MRBM's if they're attacked

Well perhaps they are - if you are correct in your statement that the missiles fire automatically if a signal is interrupted from another site. You are saying that hundreds of nuclear warheads will fire if there is a signal interruption from somewhere else in the country?Engrish_Major

LOL, 'hundreds of nuclear warheads'. No, I didn't say that.

So, if there's a power outage, or someone makes a mistake, or some other random occurrence (and communications signals are interrupted all the time), then a nuclear war is automatically sparked? Brilliant!!Engrish_Major

1) They do not have nuclear warheads

2) There are contingencies against accidents. These are not rudimentary Iraqi missiles, they're heavily programmable asian current-gen missiles

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"]A new nuclear power touting their ability to destroy targets of their enemies with missiles... so original Iran! Launching only ONE nuke into another country is more than enough to turn the entire world against them... are they really that dumb? Well perhaps they are - if you are correct in your statement that the missiles fire automatically if a signal is interrupted from another site. You are saying that hundreds of nuclear warheads will fire if there is a signal interruption from somewhere else in the country? So, if there's a power outage, or someone makes a mistake, or some other random occurrence (and communications signals are interrupted all the time), then a nuclear war is automatically sparked? Brilliant!!airshocker

I think he means those missiles are conventional. But who knows, I stopped reading when I saw him mention the draft.

Then you read the whole thing, because mentioning the draft was the last thing I alluded to. Since 2002 Iran has been making - and this is just one variant - 70 MRBM's per annum. They have approximately 800+ MRBM's. While Iran can't fit those with nukes, believe it - they'll fit them with chemical weapons. They have thousands of SRBM's, they can simply move those into Iraq. They can launch one of each a week, even when Tehran is flattened from the air. Pick your target - Saudi oil wells, US troops in Afghanistan. Iran will then shut down the Strait of Hormuz, cutting off 40% of the worlds oil supply. There is only two ways to open this: 1) Negotiate with the Iranians 2) Invade Iran to stop the missiles hitting the ships. They only need to launch one a week, the tanker insurance companies will stop insuring the ships with the threat alone. Now, in the comic-book world which most of you live in, negotiating is unthinkable. So that means invading Iran.

So where are the troops coming from to invade a Country of 70,000,000? Keep in mind, their terrain is worse than Afghanistan and there are no splits such as Shia/Sunni Iraq, they are all Shi'ite. Apparently, the volunteer army of the USA is enough to invade a Country of 70,000,000 which has tanks that Iraq could only beg for and the express backing of Russia.

You people really do live in fantasy land.

You people really do live in fantasy land.

roadkill88

3rd one in short time. Mossad is at it again.

themajormayor

Okay, I misread. Still, it would be suicidal for them to launch any missiles at US forces in Afghanistan or Israel.Engrish_Major

If the USA or Israel attacks Iran, all bets are off. Do nothing when someone creates several Chernobyls in your Country?

(and the only US citizens left in Iraq after December will be civilians) And destroying shipping routes? Another way to kill support from the rest of the world.

You're not thinking this through, when Iran is bombed - and they have over 80 nuclear sites, the only people the world will detest will be the Countries who unleashed a torrent of Chernobyls in Iran. The closing of 40% of the Worlds oil will only be blamed on whoever started the war.

Also, the minute Iran is bombed - the go ahead will be given by their leadership to either build a real nuke or buy one. And neither is that difficult for a Country the size of Iran. When Iran is attacked, they'll have the bomb within ten years. My guess is they'll just buy one. You think you can just nuke Iran and that'll be that?

The Chinese Navy has also threatened to 'quarterback' tankers coming out of Iran, should Iran close Hormuz. That means, in short, the Chinese have threatened to throw their chips in with Iran, their principle supplier of oil.

You're not thinking this through, when Iran is bombed - and they have over 80 nuclear sites, the only people the world will detest will be the Countries who unleashed a torrent of Chernobyls in Iran. The closing of 40% of the Worlds oil will only be blamed on whoever started the war.

Also, the minute Iran is bombed - the go ahead will be given by their leadership to either build a real nuke or buy one. And neither is that difficult for a Country the size of Iran. When Iran is attacked, they'll have the bomb within ten years. My guess is they'll just buy one. You think you can just nuke Iran and that'll be that?

The Chinese Navy has also threatened to 'quarterback' tankers coming out of Iran, should Iran close Hormuz. That means, in short, the Chinese have threatened to throw their chips in with Iran, their principle supplier of oil.

roadkill88

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"]Okay, I misread. Still, it would be suicidal for them to launch any missiles at US forces in Afghanistan or Israel.roadkill88

If the USA or Israel attacks Iran, all bets are off. Do nothing when someone creates several Chernobyls in your Country?

(and the only US citizens left in Iraq after December will be civilians) And destroying shipping routes? Another way to kill support from the rest of the world.

You're not thinking this through, when Iran is bombed - and they have over 80 nuclear sites, the only people the world will detest will be the Countries who unleashed a torrent of Chernobyls in Iran. The closing of 40% of the Worlds oil will only be blamed on whoever started the war.

Also, the minute Iran is bombed - the go ahead will be given by their leadership to either build a real nuke or buy one. And neither is that difficult for a Country the size of Iran. When Iran is attacked, they'll have the bomb within ten years. My guess is they'll just buy one. You think you can just nuke Iran and that'll be that?

The Chinese Navy has also threatened to 'quarterback' tankers coming out of Iran, should Iran close Hormuz. That means, in short, the Chinese have threatened to throw their chips in with Iran, their principle supplier of oil.