Do you think USA or NATO forces should enter Syria?

With all these reports about the use of Chemical Weapons on civilians and the dozens of people dying every week (above 100,000 people died since the beginning of the Civil War), do you think the US or NATO should enter Syria to try and stop this? Obama doesn't, as nobody, want to send forces to a place that'll be Iraq 2 or something like that but while people are sitting doing nothing civilians continue to die.

With all these reports about the use of Chemical Weapons on civilians and the dozens of people dying every week (above 100,000 people died since the beginning of the Civil War), do you think the US or NATO should enter Syria to try and stop this? Obama doesn't, as nobody, want to send forces to a place that'll be Iraq 2 or something like that but while people are sitting doing nothing civilians continue to die.

Hiddai

Not yet. I do support their cause for freedom but I believe we should help them by sending small forces (i.e. special forces, CIA) and guide them to the right direction. You know, pro-democracy, pro-human rights, and pro-America. And I think we already have CIA in Syria.

hell nooo. usa needs to stop policingthe world.

[QUOTE="Hiddai"]

With all these reports about the use of Chemical Weapons on civilians and the dozens of people dying every week (above 100,000 people died since the beginning of the Civil War), do you think the US or NATO should enter Syria to try and stop this? Obama doesn't, as nobody, want to send forces to a place that'll be Iraq 2 or something like that but while people are sitting doing nothing civilians continue to die.

leviathan91

Not yet. I do support their cause for freedom but I believe we should help them by sending small forces (i.e. special forces, CIA) and guide them to the right direction. You know, pro-democracy, pro-human rights, and pro-America. And I think we already have CIA in Syria.

hell nooo. usa needs to stop policingthe world.

liberalus

so NATO can police the world?

[QUOTE="liberalus"]

hell nooo. usa needs to stop policingthe world.

lostrib

so NATO can police the world?

NATO isn't soley funded by the US.

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="liberalus"]

hell nooo. usa needs to stop policingthe world.

HyperWarlock

so NATO can police the world?

NATO isn't soley funded by the US.

never said it was

Would there be a strategic, economic, or political advantage for the U.S. in doing so?  Then yes.  If not, then no.

No an aerial campaign, and the logistical support of a group of our choosing should be sufficient.

[QUOTE="liberalus"]

hell nooo. usa needs to stop policingthe world.

lostrib

so NATO can police the world?

[QUOTE="HyperWarlock"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

so NATO can police the world?

lostrib

NATO isn't soley funded by the US.

never said it was

No, nor should we ever arm any militia groups ever again

Would there be a strategic, economic, or political advantage for the U.S. in doing so?  Then yes.  If not, then no.

Oleg_Huzwog

They should intervene before there isn't any america left.

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="HyperWarlock"]

NATO isn't soley funded by the US.

liberalus

never said it was

no, i didn't at all.

No, nor should we ever arm any militia groups ever again

wis3boi

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="liberalus"]

hell nooo. usa needs to stop policingthe world.

liberalus

so NATO can police the world?

Uh, i occasionally come across your stupid posts and feel the need to comment. Yeah, sounds like trolling

[QUOTE="liberalus"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

so NATO can police the world?

lostrib

Uh, i occasionally come across your stupid posts and feel the need to comment. Yeah, sounds like trolling

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="liberalus"] dude whats ur problem with me ur always online when im online and u always troll me. liberalus

Uh, i occasionally come across your stupid posts and feel the need to comment. Yeah, sounds like trolling

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="liberalus"] dude whats ur problem with me ur always online when im online and u always troll me. liberalus

Uh, i occasionally come across your stupid posts and feel the need to comment. Yeah, sounds like trolling

see, now that's trolling. Stop being online when I am and trolling me. 

[QUOTE="liberalus"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

Uh, i occasionally come across your stupid posts and feel the need to comment. Yeah, sounds like trolling

lostrib

see, now that's trolling. Stop being online when I am and trolling me. 

If we don't intervene, we are stating to the world that it's ok to use chemical weapons and allow genocide.  Htiler 2.0.

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="liberalus"] sorry you have no girlfriend in real lifewis3boi

see, now that's trolling. Stop being online when I am and trolling me. 

sorry, my "imaginary" girlfriend wont appreciate that

If we don't intervene, we are stating to the world that it's ok to use chemical weapons and allow genocide.  Htiler 2.0.

0rbs

If we don't intervene, we are stating to the world that it's ok to use chemical weapons and allow genocide.  Htiler 2.0.

0rbs

whos commiting genocide? it sure isnt assad... Russia just said today it was the rebels who used chemical weapons

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

If we don't intervene, we are stating to the world that it's ok to use chemical weapons and allow genocide.  Htiler 2.0.

Flubbbs

whos commiting genocide? it sure isnt assad... Russia just said today it was the rebels who used chemical weapons

lol you trust russia. How cute.

Unless it poses a direct threat to those countries, they shouldn't get involved.

[QUOTE="Flubbbs"]

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

If we don't intervene, we are stating to the world that it's ok to use chemical weapons and allow genocide.  Htiler 2.0.

0rbs

whos commiting genocide? it sure isnt assad... Russia just said today it was the rebels who used chemical weapons

lol you trust russia. How cute.

and you believe what the American government says?

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

[QUOTE="Flubbbs"]

whos commiting genocide? it sure isnt assad... Russia just said today it was the rebels who used chemical weapons

Flubbbs

lol you trust russia. How cute.

and you believe what the American government says?

I believe what fox news says. They're number 1 for a reason.

[QUOTE="Flubbbs"]

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

 

lol you trust russia. How cute.

0rbs

and you believe what the American government says?

I believe what fox news says. They're number 1 for a reason.

they're number one for their opinion shows

And hand another country over to al Qaeda/Muslim Brotherhood? F*** no.

No - learn from previous errors and stay out of affairs that don't concern you. Also, with 1/6 Americans on food stamps, another war just isn't justifiable.michaelP4

Nope

[QUOTE="michaelP4"]No - learn from previous errors and stay out of affairs that don't concern you. Also, with 1/6 Americans on food stamps, another war just isn't justifiable.Hiddai

[QUOTE="Hiddai"][QUOTE="michaelP4"]No - learn from previous errors and stay out of affairs that don't concern you. Also, with 1/6 Americans on food stamps, another war just isn't justifiable.michaelP4

[QUOTE="Flubbbs"]

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

If we don't intervene, we are stating to the world that it's ok to use chemical weapons and allow genocide.  Htiler 2.0.

0rbs

whos commiting genocide? it sure isnt assad... Russia just said today it was the rebels who used chemical weapons

lol you trust russia. How cute.

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

If we don't intervene, we are stating to the world that it's ok to use chemical weapons and allow genocide.  Htiler 2.0.

Flubbbs

whos commiting genocide? it sure isnt assad... Russia just said today it was the rebels who used chemical weapons

at this point, no , its better not to get dragged into the quicksand.

at best you can try tosupport the more moderate rebels as carefully as possible, to offset the Russian aid to Assad, and the Gulf money that ends up in the hands of jihadists.

altough given Syria might just break up into ethnoreligious states anyway, so it might be stupid to send any sort of military aid, as secularists will get pushed aside.

With all these reports about the use of Chemical Weapons on civilians and the dozens of people dying every week (above 100,000 people died since the beginning of the Civil War), do you think the US or NATO should enter Syria to try and stop this? Obama doesn't, as nobody, want to send forces to a place that'll be Iraq 2 or something like that but while people are sitting doing nothing civilians continue to die.

Hiddai

[QUOTE="Hiddai"]

With all these reports about the use of Chemical Weapons on civilians and the dozens of people dying every week (above 100,000 people died since the beginning of the Civil War), do you think the US or NATO should enter Syria to try and stop this? Obama doesn't, as nobody, want to send forces to a place that'll be Iraq 2 or something like that but while people are sitting doing nothing civilians continue to die.

leviathan91

Not yet. I do support their cause for freedom but I believe we should help them by sending small forces (i.e. special forces, CIA) and guide them to the right direction. You know, pro-democracy, pro-human rights, and pro-America. And I think we already have CIA in Syria.

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

No, nor should we ever arm any militia groups ever again

Hiddai

I have no idea what the right thing to do is.  I dont like seeing any government killing off their people, but foreign military forces arent necessarily the answer.  The rebels certainly are not without fault.  Plus, do we really want the US sending its military to another middle eastern country?

If we don't intervene, we are stating to the world that it's ok to use chemical weapons and allow genocide.  Htiler 2.0.

0rbs

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

If we don't intervene, we are stating to the world that it's ok to use chemical weapons and allow genocide. Htiler 2.0.

stillheretho

do you really have the right to say that kraychik?

at this point, no , its better not to get dragged into the quicksand.

 

at best you can try tosupport the more moderate rebels as carefully as possible, to offset the Russian aid to Assad, and the Gulf money that ends up in the hands of jihadists.

 

altough given Syria might just break up into ethnoreligious states anyway, so it might be stupid to send any sort of military aid, as secularists will get pushed aside.

Darkman2007