First it was 'the end of the world in 2000', then 2010 and now 2012. I cant wait....rohver
And again, in all fairness, there could very well have been a massive disaster in 2000, if not nuclear misfires then at least a collapse of the financial system. The fact that it didn't happen is due to preparation in fixing the bug in time. Although I think a Y2k disaster would have been more likely than the world ending in 2012 is.
Log in to comment