Social Liberal
Fiscal Conservativerawsavon
Then you would be moderate. That's what I am. :D
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
Social Liberal
Fiscal ConservativeThe_AI
Then you would be moderate. That's what I am. :D
No, that's not quite a moderate. A moderate is someone who is in the middle on both social and fiscal issues. Socially liberal and fiscally conservative is more libertarian than moderate.
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
Social Liberal
Fiscal ConservativeThe_AI
Then you would be moderate. That's what I am. :D
That's not a moderate. A moderate would be in the "middle" on both of those issues. Of course, what's defined by the corporate media as the "middle" in the US isn't the real middle.
[QUOTE="The_AI"]
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
Social Liberal
Fiscal Conservativem0zart
Then you would be moderate. That's what I am. :D
No, that's not quite a moderate. A moderate is someone who is in the middle on both social and fiscal issues. Socially liberal and fiscally conservative is more libertarian than moderate.
That (libertarian) is about as close to a label as I get...but even that is not quite accurate
I am island unto my own insanities
[QUOTE="The_AI"]
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
Social Liberal
Fiscal ConservativeSgtKevali
Then you would be moderate. That's what I am. :D
That's not a moderate. A moderate would be in the "middle" on both of those issues. Of course, what's defined by the corporate media as the "middle" in the US isn't the real middle.
Yes, considering the traditional political spectrum has liberals in the middle with socialists on the left and conservatives on the right. And since "liberal" in terms of American politics means far left, coupled with the fact that a large majority of Americans are infact, liberals (just left and right wing variants of them), you have one kooky American political spectrum.
I'm more liberal when it comes to social issues and more conservative when it comes to economical issues but it really depends on the issue. Abortion I am both conservative and liberal, on gun control I'm a flaming conservative, and on civil rights I'm a flaming liberal except for Affirmative Action.
I would consider myself a libertarian, and the closest thing on the poll that I would relate to would be very conservative, with a some differences here and there about beliefs.
I consider myself pretty conservative, but I'm for gay marriage, gays being able to adopt, and against the dealth penalty. And to think this White House calls me a rightwing extremist all because I don't support abortion....:?
I consider myself pretty conservative, but I'm for gay marriage, gays being able to adopt, and against the dealth penalty. And to think this White House calls me a rightwing extremist all because I don't support abortion....:?
peaceful_anger
You're starting to pickup on why the conservative/liberal paradigm is irrational.
[QUOTE="peaceful_anger"]
I consider myself pretty conservative, but I'm for gay marriage, gays being able to adopt, and against the dealth penalty. And to think this White House calls me a rightwing extremist all because I don't support abortion....:?
QuistisTrepe_
You're starting to pickup on why the conservative/liberal paradigm is irrational.
perhaps, but society rarely lacks a "us and them' mentality.We put binaries on everything.On a side note, you all may want to take a look at the Political Compass' icon quiz. You'll never see Gandhi the same way again:
The Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher's knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs.~Mahatma Gandhi, on absolute non-violence, speaking to biographer Louis Fisher in June 1946.
:o:o:o
I cant imagine myself caring any less about politics or government. In the end i have no say and sans having a position of power, i know i cant change anything that affects myself directly.
The theory that "every vote counts" is a fallacy. Im in that select demographic that no candidate is going to do anything for regardless so voting and or caring who wins/makes the decisions is pointless by default.
And i wont be burdened by the "its your duty to vote" jargon either. Its not my duty to represent a candidate who is NOT going to represent me.
My views are neither here nor there. Im not for or against anything. If someone wants to abort their child, its not my place to care. If someone wants to marry someone of the same sex...again its not my business or my job to give a **** either way.
I'll bet anything that that's out of context.On a side note, you all may want to take a look at the icon quiz. You'll never see Gandhi the same way again:
The Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher's knife. Theyshould have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs.~Mahatma Gandhi, on absolute non-violence, speaking to biographer Louis Fisher in June 1946.
:o:o:o
QuistisTrepe_
[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]I'll bet anything that that's out of context.On a side note, you all may want to take a look at the icon quiz. You'll never see Gandhi the same way again:
The Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher's knife. Theyshould have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs.~Mahatma Gandhi, on absolute non-violence, speaking to biographer Louis Fisher in June 1946.
:o:o:o
Theokhoth
Not if you look up the rest of the nonsense he uttered.
[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"][QUOTE="peaceful_anger"]
I consider myself pretty conservative, but I'm for gay marriage, gays being able to adopt, and against the dealth penalty. And to think this White House calls me a rightwing extremist all because I don't support abortion....:?
buldog300
You're starting to pickup on why the conservative/liberal paradigm is irrational.
perhaps, but society rarely lacks a "us and them' mentality.We put binaries on everything.I believe in America we're starting to move away from that.
[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]I'll bet anything that that's out of context. It is. This quote is not about Gandhi hating Jews its about him saying that if they took a stance of non-violence then they would have the moral high ground and the rest of Germany would follow in supporting them against the Nazis. Its taking non-violence a little too far but its not an anti-Jew statement.On a side note, you all may want to take a look at the icon quiz. You'll never see Gandhi the same way again:
The Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher's knife. Theyshould have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs.~Mahatma Gandhi, on absolute non-violence, speaking to biographer Louis Fisher in June 1946.
:o:o:o
Theokhoth
I'm a moderate-strong conservative. In Australia there is no party that represents 'liberal' views. There are the Liberals (conservative), Democrats/Family First (centralists), Labour (social democratic) and Greens (socialists), but nothing in the form of 'liberal'
I'm a moderate-strong conservative. In Australia there is no party that represents 'liberal' views. There are the Liberals (conservative), Democrats/Family First (centralists), Labour (social democratic) and Greens (socialists), but nothing in the form of 'liberal'
daqua_99
labour stand for social liberalism, which would be an extreme form of liberalism in america
I took a quiz, here are the results:
Result: Conservative
This quiz has categorised you as a Conservative. You believe in a limited/minimal role in the government to solve social problems, and instead believe economic growth is paramount. It is possible you may identify with the "religious right" as well.
Result Breakdown:
91% Conservative
79% Libertarian
65% Liberal
41% Fascist/Radical Right
38% Social Democrat
14% Communist/Radical Left
WHy do you feel the need to reply with a sarcastic comment when one is not necessary?Um, relax? :?[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="scorch-62"] Mind = blown.Teenaged
Its just sarcasm.... gee
Why is it necessary? I did not address him or any of his posts, yet he replies with sarcasm for no apparent reason.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment