Confederate Flag for the N-Word?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d
deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d

7914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d
Member since 2005 • 7914 Posts

I live in the south where a drive down ol' country roads will lead you by many houses with confederate flags hanging. Shoot, there is a giant confederate flag waiving in open site by a major interstate road. People around here wear and sale confederate flag merchandise. It's part of society, and it means more than just slavery.

Most black people that say the n word aren't hate mongering racist likewise white people with confederate flags aren't complete biggots.

(We seriously need to stop thinking the worse of people, that is so rampant online.)

One argument I never see is; if only black people are allowed to say the n word then shouldn't it be fair enough for white people to waive the confederate flag?

I'm not white or black so I'm not bias towards a side.

What do you think? Isn't it a good trade off?

There's the hypersensitive people that think black people shouldn't use the n word and white people shouldn't use the confederate flag but that sounds like the forming of a nanny state where the government decides what is socially exceptable down to the words you say or clothes you wear. This is the land of the free, America!

Avatar image for raugutcon
raugutcon

5576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 raugutcon
Member since 2014 • 5576 Posts

You had too much coffee.

Avatar image for fenriz275
fenriz275

2383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 fenriz275
Member since 2003 • 2383 Posts

Using either is the same as tattooing ignorant dumbass on your forehead. If you don't have a problem with that then by all means go ahead.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

56107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By DaVillain  Moderator  Online
Member since 2014 • 56107 Posts

I'm Southern and never really care about the damn confederate flag in my life.

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

White people can say the n-word, as long as they aren't using it in a derogatory manner.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44172 Posts

Black people using the N-word isn't the same as white people waving the confederate flag though so it's not really something you can "trade-off" so to speak. Both were used by white people in a time of slavery. A black person using the N-word doesn't hold the same conotation as a white person using it whereas a white person using the confederate flag today can still hold the same conotation as it did back then.

Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

@KHAndAnime said:

White people can say the n-word, as long as they aren't using it in a derogatory manner.

You sure? Because Jackie Chan in Rush Hour said it which led to a brawl at the bar.

Avatar image for TheHighWind
TheHighWind

5724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By TheHighWind
Member since 2003 • 5724 Posts

This thread is worse than trying to stream a Gamespot video.

Avatar image for YearoftheSnake5
YearoftheSnake5

9716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#9 YearoftheSnake5
Member since 2005 • 9716 Posts

Black people saying the n word is just as ignorant as someone waving the confederate flag around saying it's not a racist symbol.

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#10 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts

I'm tired of this flag issue. It was never this big of an issue before Dylan Roof, and now that he used it as a symbol of his hate crime, the flag is being scapegoated. People have got to understand that the flag is NOT inherently racist. It's merely a symbol of the South. Racist people may fly the Confederate Flag, but then again didn't the KKK wave the US flag during their rallies? Many evils far worse than racism were done with the Stars and Stripes being flown, yet those who have that particular flag adorned on their porch will not say that the flag stands for any of those bad things.

There are people who fly the Confederate Flag solely for the purpose of representing their southern heritage, and that's it. If you still think those flag fliers are racist, then the black people who adorn those flags and symbols must really hate themselves, too. Stop judging people based on what they fly. You know, I had to unfriend someone who thought I was an idiot because I still liked the Dukes of Hazard. It's ridiculous.

Avatar image for samusbeliskner
SamusBeliskner

569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 SamusBeliskner
Member since 2015 • 569 Posts

The confederate flag is a political symbol for many ignorant Republicans, ignorant of the true meaning of the flag; the other is a pejorative term. The two are hardly comparable.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#12 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20510 Posts

If people wanna say the n-word then say it. If people wanna fly the Confederate flag, do it. There will also (probably) be consequences.

And that's that.

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

Black people using the N-word isn't the same as white people waving the confederate flag though so it's not really something you can "trade-off" so to speak. Both were used by white people in a time of slavery. A black person using the N-word doesn't hold the same conotation as a white person using it whereas a white person using the confederate flag today can still hold the same conotation as it did back then.

This exactly. If black people start using the confederate flag (please my fellow black people....have some respect) then it would be a similar situation as the N-Word. I'm not a fan of the N-Word, but if one of my friends uses it to call me I dont take offense.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I believe that both black and white people should give up skinny jeans Other than that, the rest is uncertain.

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

@thegerg said:

@KHAndAnime:

Not according to GS.

I meant outside of GS. I don't consider the rules of GS to be representative of what most of American citizens consider acceptable. For example, pretty sure only a small minority of Americans would take extreme offense to calling someone transgendered by their original gender (example: referring to Caitlyn Jenner as a "he"), - but here it's a ban-worthy offense. GS leans so far left with their policies, they're practically the PC Nazi's. It would be impossible to have a discussion about gender dysmorphia on this board without a dozen mods shitting a brick at the amount of moderation they'd have to enforce.

I wonder when we'll come to the point where we feel the need to protect the stupid too - so if you say something is a "stupid idea", you'll get in trouble - because after all that would hurt the feelings of the person who wrote that idea and putting down stupidity would be offensive to people who were born without any wit.

But that's probably a tangent better left discussed elsewhere...

Avatar image for hood_honky
Hood_Honky

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18  Edited By Hood_Honky
Member since 2015 • 979 Posts

@Archangel3371: well if black ppl can embrace that word abd turn into a meaning of friend, why cablbt they embrace the flag.

They were slaves under the American flag a lot longer than a battle flag.

The American flag also decide they weren't worthy of rights.

Black ppl need to quick searching for special treatment.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

It's more or less a matter of respect and decency to refrain from using words or symbols that will offend others.


Nothing is stopping you from ignoring it and use such words and symbols, you can walk into a gospel church with a confederate flag, or Auschwitz with the nazi symbol on your shirt.

But that doesn't mean cause and consequences won't take affect.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44172 Posts

@hood_honky said:

@Archangel3371: well if black ppl can embrace that word abd turn into a meaning of friend, why cablbt they embrace the flag.

They were slaves under the American flag a lot longer than a battle flag.

The American flag also decide they weren't worthy of rights.

Black ppl need to quick searching for special treatment.

Well I guess they could if they wanted to, and perhaps some do, but they certainly don't have to.

I think there's a much greater distinction of slavery between the Confederate flag and the American flag.

Black people as a whole aren't looking for special treatment, they're looking for equal treatment. That's not to say that there aren't those who do look for special treatment but that can be said of all people regardless of skin colour, religious beliefs, sex, etc.

Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#22 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

I Leave symbols to the symbol minded, whatever that symbol is. That said, The confederacy is no more and that flag was flown to fight for slavery. So... we should look at it as a piece of history and that's about it. Saying N is just as ignorant.

Avatar image for bmanva
bmanva

4680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By bmanva
Member since 2002 • 4680 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

Black people using the N-word isn't the same as white people waving the confederate flag though so it's not really something you can "trade-off" so to speak. Both were used by white people in a time of slavery. A black person using the N-word doesn't hold the same conotation as a white person using it whereas a white person using the confederate flag today can still hold the same conotation as it did back then.

I agree. You can't make trades like that because despite what some people would have you believe blacks and whites are not equal and won't be for a very long time. There's a history there that causes the inequality until that history is forgotten. Words and symbols are empowered by their historical context; black usage of the n-word among themselves doesn't have the racist historical context of white usage of that word. That why I also don't believe it's possible for black (or any minorities really) to be racist. Sure, they can be prejudiced but I don't consider that racism per se; a black man treating a white person poorly is just a moron to the white guy, but a white man treating a black person poorly brings with it reminder of hundreds of years of oppression to the black guy.

Loading Video...

Avatar image for hood_honky
Hood_Honky

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Hood_Honky
Member since 2015 • 979 Posts

@Archangel3371: the thing is tho, they have equal treatment.

There is absolutely Nothing keeping these ppl on welfare. Nothing is keeping them on minimal wage jobs. They are given more scholarship opportunities than anyone else. They are keeping themselves down. No one else. Unless of course you ask the race baiter Sharpton.

Black ppl should get with the times and quit being so obsessed with color. Black entertainment. Black caucus. Black history. Black ppl meet dot com. Naacp.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44172 Posts

@bmanva: Yes, exactly.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

@playmynutz said:

I live in the south where a drive down ol' country roads will lead you by many houses with confederate flags hanging. Shoot, there is a giant confederate flag waiving in open site by a major interstate road. People around here wear and sale confederate flag merchandise. It's part of society, and it means more than just slavery.

Most black people that say the n word aren't hate mongering racist likewise white people with confederate flags aren't complete biggots.

... So you wouldn't have a problem with a person waving the Nazi flag in showing pride of the courage of German soldiers? This popular belief is insulting because its basically a bold faced lie, pick a different symbol if you must.. Fact: The Confederacy was a treasonous government that seceded due to the fear of Lincoln abolishing slavery. Fact: The southern states only gave a shit about "states rights" when it affected them, they had no problem in supporting a federal law like the Fugitive Slave act which would force northern free states to enforce it even when it was against their wishes.. Fact: The confederate flag only became popular again in the modern era because of the civil rights movement during the 1960s..

(We seriously need to stop thinking the worse of people, that is so rampant online.)

One argument I never see is; if only black people are allowed to say the n word then shouldn't it be fair enough for white people to waive the confederate flag?

Who exactly is saying that? Because most people I know don't like when ANY one uses that word, including blacks..

I'm not white or black so I'm not bias towards a side.

What do you think? Isn't it a good trade off?

How bout saying that both are deplorable to begin with? It's your right under the first amendment to do such things, and I respect that.. But don't be surprised if I think your a piece of crap because of it.

There's the hypersensitive people that think black people shouldn't use the n word

There have been no laws.. No one has been imprisoned for saying that.. But your not free from criticisms..

and white people shouldn't use the confederate flag

but that sounds like the forming of a nanny state where the government decides what is socially exceptable down to the words you say or clothes you wear. This is the land of the free, America!

.. You seem to be confused, this stuff is protected under the first amendment.. It's your freedom to which your allowed to fly that confederate flag on your private property.. Just as it is my right to call you a jackass for doing so.. The only time government has been involved is when jackasses fly a treasonous flag on public government property, paid by tax dollars.

Avatar image for drunk_pi
Drunk_PI

3358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Drunk_PI
Member since 2014 • 3358 Posts

Not understanding what the confederate battle flag represents and w

@JustPlainLucas said:

I'm tired of this flag issue. It was never this big of an issue before Dylan Roof, and now that he used it as a symbol of his hate crime, the flag is being scapegoated. People have got to understand that the flag is NOT inherently racist. It's merely a symbol of the South. Racist people may fly the Confederate Flag, but then again didn't the KKK wave the US flag during their rallies? Many evils far worse than racism were done with the Stars and Stripes being flown, yet those who have that particular flag adorned on their porch will not say that the flag stands for any of those bad things.

There are people who fly the Confederate Flag solely for the purpose of representing their southern heritage, and that's it. If you still think those flag fliers are racist, then the black people who adorn those flags and symbols must really hate themselves, too. Stop judging people based on what they fly. You know, I had to unfriend someone who thought I was an idiot because I still liked the Dukes of Hazard. It's ridiculous.

Except there have been protests against the confederate flag on government property but weren't as publicized as much ever since the shooting. Also, the confederate battle flag is associated with the confederacy whose goal was to preserve the institution of slavery in the South due to the North's opposition to it and the flag itself has been used many times in anti-Civil Rights protests during the 1960s. As for the American flag, yes it has been used in KKK rallies, but that flag has been used to represent the entire country and the KKK's goal was to unite the country under their ideology. The American flag represents a lot of things and has been used for good and bad, same with many other flags of the world.

Seriously, it's like the Germans erecting a statue of Adolf Hitler and waving the Nazi flag citing "German heritage!!" The problem is whitewashing the history of the flag and defending statues of Jefferson Davis or Nathan Bedford Forrest ignoring the crimes and atrocities they have committed. In fact, how a self-proclaimed "patriot" can wave the confederate flag (a flag associated with secession and treason) is beyond me. I do agree that banning the flag is unreasonable and unconstitutional and that the graves and perhaps even statues of confederate troops should be protected but my problem with this whole "southern heritage" argument is that it just whitewashing.

As for black people waving the confederate flag, yeah, I don't care. The flag still represents what it really represents.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

@thegerg said:

@Treflis:

"Nothing is stopping you from ignoring it and use such words and symbols, you can walk into a gospel church with a confederate flag, or Auschwitz with the nazi symbol on your shirt."

Well, nothing other than hate speech laws, that is. But, hey, just ignore that. Right?

Well those would be the consequences if they do it.

From a physical point nothing is stopping them from putting on such a shirt or carry such a flag, but if they do then they are breaking the laws and will face the consequences for it.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

No, its not a good trade because property shouldn't be banned in America. Have these people that say they are on the right side of history deface confederate graves too.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

@LOXO7 said:

No, its not a good trade because property shouldn't be banned in America. Have these people that say they are on the right side of history deface confederate graves too.

I don't think any one has seriously suggested the banning of free speech.. The only thing that has been stopped is the flying of the confederate flag on federal and state properties as it should be.... The only real problem I have with the confederate flag is the revisionist history to defend their support of waving it..

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

@sSubZerOo: That is fine of you having a problem with it. But what isn't, is you acting upon it to solve your problem.

What revisionist history? State's rights?

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

@LOXO7 said:

@sSubZerOo: That is fine of you having a problem with it. But what isn't, is you acting upon it to solve your problem.

What revisionist history? State's rights?

How I am acting upon it? By calling a person who flies it a asshole? It's your right to fly it on your private property or on your self, the only thing that was acted upon was when a treasonous flag was being flown on state and federal property. Revisionist history in that the flag some how represents "state's rights", and that was the main reason for the civil war.. Which as stated earlier, was absolute horse shit.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178845 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

Black people using the N-word isn't the same as white people waving the confederate flag though so it's not really something you can "trade-off" so to speak. Both were used by white people in a time of slavery. A black person using the N-word doesn't hold the same conotation as a white person using it whereas a white person using the confederate flag today can still hold the same conotation as it did back then.

The confederate flag did not mean slavery.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

@JustPlainLucas said:

I'm tired of this flag issue. It was never this big of an issue before Dylan Roof, and now that he used it as a symbol of his hate crime, the flag is being scapegoated. People have got to understand that the flag is NOT inherently racist. It's merely a symbol of the South. Racist people may fly the Confederate Flag, but then again didn't the KKK wave the US flag during their rallies? Many evils far worse than racism were done with the Stars and Stripes being flown, yet those who have that particular flag adorned on their porch will not say that the flag stands for any of those bad things.

There are people who fly the Confederate Flag solely for the purpose of representing their southern heritage, and that's it. If you still think those flag fliers are racist, then the black people who adorn those flags and symbols must really hate themselves, too. Stop judging people based on what they fly. You know, I had to unfriend someone who thought I was an idiot because I still liked the Dukes of Hazard. It's ridiculous.

lmao

From the designer of the flag itself: "As a people, we are fighting to maintain the Heaven-ordained supremacy of the white man over the inferior or colored race; a white flag would thus be emblematical of our cause… Such a flag…would soon take rank among the proudest ensigns of the nations, and be hailed by the civilized world as the white man's flag.… As a national emblem, it is significant of our higher cause, the cause of a superior race, and a higher civilization contending against ignorance, infidelity, and barbarism. Another merit in the new flag is, that it bears no resemblance to the now infamous banner of the Yankee vandals." - William Tappan Thompson

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

@sSubZerOo: Acting upon it as in banning it. Treason? I didn't read...

The north was afraid of the south removing "its" economy. The north cared more about trade than slaves.

Calling the north, the north is even wrong. States can form allies with other states, but they can't coerce other states into doing something.

All states have every right to secede since they have the right to become a state in the first place. The federal government didn't create states then include them in the United States. So then they have the right to remove themselves from the union and become a different state because they created themselves first.

"Fact: The southern states only gave a shit about "states rights" when it affected them, they had no problem in supporting a federal law like the Fugitive Slave act which would force northern free states to enforce it even when it was against their wishes.."

Did the northern states fight for their new citizens or just hand them over the boarder? If they did the latter it would seem that they cared more about something else.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

@LOXO7 said:

@sSubZerOo: Acting upon it as in banning it. Treason? I didn't read...

The north was afraid of the south removing "its" economy. The north cared more about trade than slaves.

Calling the north, the north is even wrong. States can form allies with other states, but they can't coerce other states into doing something.

All states have every right to secede since they have the right to become a state in the first place. The federal government didn't create states then include them in the United States. So then they have the right to remove themselves from the union and become a different state because they created themselves first.

"Fact: The southern states only gave a shit about "states rights" when it affected them, they had no problem in supporting a federal law like the Fugitive Slave act which would force northern free states to enforce it even when it was against their wishes.."

Did the northern states fight for their new citizens or just hand them over the boarder? If they did the latter it would seem that they cared more about something else.

This is wrong too lol. Seceding from the Union has been illegal forever but codified in Texas v. White in 1869. It was only "legal" before because there was no legal precedent and the problem never arose. If you read the actual court case you'll see the judges ruled that Texas never really seceded in the first place because it was always property of the United States. The Constitution has never permitted states to secede.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

@Aljosa23: That is one guys opinion of the war and the flag. He's a racist. Therefore anyone who flies this flag is a racist? Phaha!

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178845 Posts

@Aljosa23 said:
@JustPlainLucas said:

I'm tired of this flag issue. It was never this big of an issue before Dylan Roof, and now that he used it as a symbol of his hate crime, the flag is being scapegoated. People have got to understand that the flag is NOT inherently racist. It's merely a symbol of the South. Racist people may fly the Confederate Flag, but then again didn't the KKK wave the US flag during their rallies? Many evils far worse than racism were done with the Stars and Stripes being flown, yet those who have that particular flag adorned on their porch will not say that the flag stands for any of those bad things.

There are people who fly the Confederate Flag solely for the purpose of representing their southern heritage, and that's it. If you still think those flag fliers are racist, then the black people who adorn those flags and symbols must really hate themselves, too. Stop judging people based on what they fly. You know, I had to unfriend someone who thought I was an idiot because I still liked the Dukes of Hazard. It's ridiculous.

lmao

From the designer of the flag itself: "As a people, we are fighting to maintain the Heaven-ordained supremacy of the white man over the inferior or colored race; a white flag would thus be emblematical of our cause… Such a flag…would soon take rank among the proudest ensigns of the nations, and be hailed by the civilized world as the white man's flag.… As a national emblem, it is significant of our higher cause, the cause of a superior race, and a higher civilization contending against ignorance, infidelity, and barbarism. Another merit in the new flag is, that it bears no resemblance to the now infamous banner of the Yankee vandals." - William Tappan Thompson

Um the flag isn't white and he designed the second of three flags. The third is the current one I believe.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39  Edited By deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

@LOXO7 said:

@Aljosa23: That is one guys opinion of the war and the flag. He's a racist. Therefore anyone who flies this flag is a racist? Phaha!

Not sure this is sarcasm but considering he designed one of the versions used... yes.

edit: well maybe not racist but more ignorant or misguided. Might arise from the South being poorer and dumber on average.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
@Aljosa23 said:
@LOXO7 said:

@sSubZerOo: Acting upon it as in banning it. Treason? I didn't read...

The north was afraid of the south removing "its" economy. The north cared more about trade than slaves.

Calling the north, the north is even wrong. States can form allies with other states, but they can't coerce other states into doing something.

All states have every right to secede since they have the right to become a state in the first place. The federal government didn't create states then include them in the United States. So then they have the right to remove themselves from the union and become a different state because they created themselves first.

"Fact: The southern states only gave a shit about "states rights" when it affected them, they had no problem in supporting a federal law like the Fugitive Slave act which would force northern free states to enforce it even when it was against their wishes.."

Did the northern states fight for their new citizens or just hand them over the boarder? If they did the latter it would seem that they cared more about something else.

This is wrong too lol. Seceding from the Union has been illegal forever but codified in Texas v. White in 1869. It was only "legal" before because there was no legal precedent and the problem never arose. If you read the actual court case you'll see the judges ruled that Texas never really seceded in the first place because it was always property of the United States. The Constitution has never permitted states to secede.

You don't know rights. You point to permissions. If you have the right to be free, how the hell can you then support government giving you permission to be free? You are adding and unnecessary middle man that is the one that's being unlawful.

Contain yourself. I know you are going to laugh, but where in our law does it say government rules people? The federal government follows the rules of the people, which are free seeing as they can create a law that is the government and is for the government. How do they have this power, yet fail to remove themselves from an insubordinate creation?

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41  Edited By deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

@LOXO7 said:
@Aljosa23 said:
@LOXO7 said:

@sSubZerOo: Acting upon it as in banning it. Treason? I didn't read...

The north was afraid of the south removing "its" economy. The north cared more about trade than slaves.

Calling the north, the north is even wrong. States can form allies with other states, but they can't coerce other states into doing something.

All states have every right to secede since they have the right to become a state in the first place. The federal government didn't create states then include them in the United States. So then they have the right to remove themselves from the union and become a different state because they created themselves first.

"Fact: The southern states only gave a shit about "states rights" when it affected them, they had no problem in supporting a federal law like the Fugitive Slave act which would force northern free states to enforce it even when it was against their wishes.."

Did the northern states fight for their new citizens or just hand them over the boarder? If they did the latter it would seem that they cared more about something else.

This is wrong too lol. Seceding from the Union has been illegal forever but codified in Texas v. White in 1869. It was only "legal" before because there was no legal precedent and the problem never arose. If you read the actual court case you'll see the judges ruled that Texas never really seceded in the first place because it was always property of the United States. The Constitution has never permitted states to secede.

You don't know rights. You point to permissions. If you have the right to be free, how the hell can you then support government giving you permission to be free? You are adding and unnecessary middle man that is the one that's being unlawful.

Contain yourself. I know you are going to laugh, but where in our law does it say government rules people? The federal government follows the rules of the people, which are free seeing as they can create a law that is the government and is for the government. How do they have this power, yet fail to remove themselves from an insubordinate creation?

Sorry m8 but that's how the laws and real world works. No such thing as natural rights and I'd rather not get into that boring philosophical topic lest I fall asleep. I did have a feeling you'd go there and it's my fault for not telling you to stop before you got started.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

@Aljosa23 said:
@LOXO7 said:
@Aljosa23 said:
@LOXO7 said:

@sSubZerOo: Acting upon it as in banning it. Treason? I didn't read...

The north was afraid of the south removing "its" economy. The north cared more about trade than slaves.

Calling the north, the north is even wrong. States can form allies with other states, but they can't coerce other states into doing something.

All states have every right to secede since they have the right to become a state in the first place. The federal government didn't create states then include them in the United States. So then they have the right to remove themselves from the union and become a different state because they created themselves first.

"Fact: The southern states only gave a shit about "states rights" when it affected them, they had no problem in supporting a federal law like the Fugitive Slave act which would force northern free states to enforce it even when it was against their wishes.."

Did the northern states fight for their new citizens or just hand them over the boarder? If they did the latter it would seem that they cared more about something else.

This is wrong too lol. Seceding from the Union has been illegal forever but codified in Texas v. White in 1869. It was only "legal" before because there was no legal precedent and the problem never arose. If you read the actual court case you'll see the judges ruled that Texas never really seceded in the first place because it was always property of the United States. The Constitution has never permitted states to secede.

You don't know rights. You point to permissions. If you have the right to be free, how the hell can you then support government giving you permission to be free? You are adding and unnecessary middle man that is the one that's being unlawful.

Contain yourself. I know you are going to laugh, but where in our law does it say government rules people? The federal government follows the rules of the people, which are free seeing as they can create a law that is the government and is for the government. How do they have this power, yet fail to remove themselves from an insubordinate creation?

Sorry m8 but that's how the laws and real world works. No such thing as natural rights and I'd rather not get into that boring philosophical topic lest I fall asleep. I did have a feeling you'd go there and it's my fault for not telling you to stop before you got started.

Good luck to you in the future.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36040 Posts

@playmynutz: how would "hypersensitive people" trying to change other people's behavior be considered the government telling you what is acceptable? Wouldn't it just be a few regular people hoping to change society? Or are the people you're referring to actual elected officials?

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44  Edited By jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

Having either one is a sign of poor upbringing. Why not get rid of both?

Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts

The flag is a symbol of treason and racism.

Every American should be offended by it in the context that the confederates were an enemy that U.S. that killed people in our military.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

Irrespective of the racist and treasonous legacy of the flag, I find it disgraceful and treasonous for someone to wave anything other than his country's flag.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

it's all a joke.

how can you be upset about some redneck flag and be fine with the slaveholders on the money and the monuments everywhere to the founding fathers.

people are just flat out not smart enough to look at the big picture.

jefferson was a slave raping child seller and that fucker is held up as the epitome of moral forthrightnesshood.

you don't destroy the monuments and symbols of the past, you build a new generation of monuments to celebrate the black pioneers in art, sciences, politics and civil rights that arose after the destruction of the antebellum south.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#48  Edited By whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

@playmynutz said:

(We seriously need to stop thinking the worse of people, that is so rampant online.)

I totally agree.