Cloning Humans: Yes or No?

In the past few years, Scientists have cloned various species such as sheep, cats, and dogs. Now do you think scientists should clone humans? Yes? No?

No. We are overcrowded enough as it is.

I support it. The value of human clones are numerous.

Though I dont think the UN and their "Human rights" maniacs would ever approve of it.

no. why? because we humans have over crowded the planet already. we dont need 12 billion ppl on earth right now.

I support it. The value of human clones are numerous.

Though I dont think the UN and their "Human rights" maniacs would ever approve of it.

majwill24

[QUOTE="majwill24"]

I support it. The value of human clones are numerous.

Though I dont think the UN and their "Human rights" maniacs would ever approve of it.

BattleTurtles

I guess my idea of human cloning is for harvesting purposes or testing purposes to tailor make treatments specifically for your physiology. If having a non-censored Internet is considered a "human right" you can be sure that cloning humans for medical purposes would definitely be a no-no

[QUOTE="BattleTurtles"][QUOTE="majwill24"]

I support it. The value of human clones are numerous.

Though I dont think the UN and their "Human rights" maniacs would ever approve of it.

majwill24

I guess my idea of human cloning is for harvesting purposes or testing purposes to tailor make treatments specifically for your physiology. If having a non-censored Internet is considered a "human right" you can be sure that cloning humans for medical purposes would definitely be a no-no

I think as long as you clone a full human, they need to have all the rights of a human. If that's done, then that's fine.

No way. Too many people already exist that annoy me. I'd not want to multiple that....LJS9502_basic

I would be extremely surprised if someone hasn't already done it in secret already.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No way. Too many people already exist that annoy me. I'd not want to multiple that....Pirate700

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No way. Too many people already exist that annoy me. I'd not want to multiple that....Pirate700

I don't support it.

I'm going to say why? I can't think of a legitimate eithical reason to close humans. So, no.

No, but only because (last I heard) cloned animals tend to have serious health problems. Creating a child knowing that they're going to have those kinds of problems seems sort of unfair, in my opinion.

However, assuming that the technology advances enough for clones to live a perfectly healthy life, then why not make clones? I don't see it as being all that different than other reproductive technologies.

Currently, no. Under (extremely) different circumstances, then perhaps.

EDIT: Unless we're eventually able to use it as a way for couples who can't have children to make a baby. Assuming of course we work out all the "kinks" first.

No. We don't need that type of knowledge falling into the wrong hands. If some lunatic can get his hands on it, that could be bad. And the Earth is crowded enough as it is. We don't need to feel it up even more with things that wasn't brought into this world naturally...

No. We are overcrowded enough as it is.

Pirate700

No, Humans should not be clone :/

They need to clone more animals first sucessfully.

I'd be in favor of cloning specific human body parts. I just KNOW my liver is going to fail from alcohol abuse eventually.nocoolnamejim

I don't think overcrowding would be an issue, as it would cost billions to create just one clone. They wouldn't run a local boutique were you can go and clone yourself for lulz

The scientific advantages of cloning certain body parts are infinite, but as with every advancement, it will take a few decades to get over the ethical issues

I'm in favour of cloning specific parts/organs. There was a documentary on a while back, and some scientists showed off a beating heart, made entirely in the lab from stem cells and chemicals.

It was facinating.

Cloning full humans movie-style? Nah

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No way. Too many people already exist that annoy me. I'd not want to multiple that....lonewolf604

Also, I don't support it because there is no use for it, except for slave labor things like that, or a Moon type situation, but then of course I don't support it. Cloning organs could have a good use though...

Nope, we already have too many annoying cure fans already.lonewolf604

No, because that means overcrowding and more annoying people.:evil::P

No. We are overcrowded enough as it is.

Pirate700

an im pretty sure we would use them as slaves or something

Sure, I don't see anything wrong with the mere act of cloning a human, the problem would be how the clone was treated and what he was used for. It doesn't matter if he was man-made or not, a clone is still human.

No I think Cloning Humans is not right.

My biology class is currently talking about this. The intelligent people in the class have come with this conclusion: use human dna to grow organs, don't clone full blown humans. Problem solved.

I'm tired of seeing humans become amess. Wouldn't want to see undeveloped humans floating around messing up the place even more.

Animal cloning, yes. Human cloning, no way because human cloning is against the ethics and religion and God creates humans, not humans create humans.amirzaim

I'm pretty sure my mom created me.

Animal cloning, yes. Human cloning, no way because human cloning is against the ethics and religion and God creates humans, not humans create humans.amirzaim

Animal cloning, yes. Human cloning, no way because human cloning is against the ethics and religion and God creates humans, not humans create humans.amirzaim

I thought it was God who created animals as well?