Star Fox 64 3D review (Ign)

  • 51 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Gamingclone
Gamingclone

5224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 Gamingclone
Member since 2009 • 5224 Posts

Just as I expected......

[spoiler] A 9! Wow! Here is Ign's Review - http://ds.ign.com/articles/119/1192306p1.html Yeah glitch spot wont let me link [/spoiler]

I expect gamespot will give it an 8 since it lacks online multiplayer.

Avatar image for AvatarMan96
AvatarMan96

7324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

#2 AvatarMan96
Member since 2010 • 7324 Posts

Since GS keeps dissing 3DS, I'm betting a 7.5 or lower :(

Avatar image for rapidshot20
rapidshot20

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 rapidshot20
Member since 2008 • 160 Posts

That's just what the 3ds needs right now more good games, I bet Vita fanboys are still gonna discredit it though because its a remake.

Avatar image for gamenerd15
gamenerd15

4529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 gamenerd15
Member since 2007 • 4529 Posts

There is nothing new besides the time attack mode and multiplayer power ups. Remakes need more than just a coat of paint. The game is still cool, but I would not call it a killer app.

Avatar image for Jelley0
Jelley0

1867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Jelley0
Member since 2009 • 1867 Posts

I still don't see how a remake that did nothing more than up the graphics received a 9.

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#6 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts
Was thinking of getting the game since I still haven't played the N64 original, but my expenses are looking like crap this month.
Avatar image for Kirbside
Kirbside

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Kirbside
Member since 2005 • 314 Posts
Awesome I will wait till I get it on Sept. 9 but I will likely rate it similar. I really liked it on the 64, and now I can play it anywhere.
Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
Needs to be 2 points lower for no wifi play. What reasoning is there to not putting it on there? Family 3DS time!?
Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#9 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts
Needs to be 2 points lower for no wifi play. What reasoning is there to not putting it on there? Family 3DS time!?ZumaJones07
That's quite simple. Nintendo just hates trying to support networks that allow for online games.
Avatar image for Ghost120x
Ghost120x

6060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Ghost120x
Member since 2009 • 6060 Posts

I'm still on the fence because I played the original (2 years ago) so much it's pretty much still in my memory. And graphically it's only slightly better and I'd rather see an hd version on the Wii U.

Avatar image for Gamingclone
Gamingclone

5224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#11 Gamingclone
Member since 2009 • 5224 Posts

Needs to be 2 points lower for no wifi play. What reasoning is there to not putting it on there? Family 3DS time!?ZumaJones07

It does have Wifi play though...

just not world wide multiplayer, only local.

Avatar image for Lionmclionton92
Lionmclionton92

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Lionmclionton92
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Glad to see it got a good score, even though i would of picked it up no matter what. :D
Avatar image for gamer_CNSK
gamer_CNSK

175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 gamer_CNSK
Member since 2010 • 175 Posts
No online play has killed me wanting to get this. That would have sent me straight to the store day one. Now I will hold off and wait until I get either get a sale deal on it, or borrow/rent it.
Avatar image for DJ_Lae
DJ_Lae

42748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#14 DJ_Lae
Member since 2002 • 42748 Posts

There is nothing new besides the time attack mode and multiplayer power ups. Remakes need more than just a coat of paint. The game is still cool, but I would not call it a killer app.

gamenerd15
Can't argue. I can't believe IGN gave what is little more than a barebones port a 9. I can't believe anyone is actually going to buy it, it's just giving Nintendo the thumbs up that lazy ports are okay.
Avatar image for ANIMEguy10034
ANIMEguy10034

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ANIMEguy10034
Member since 2008 • 4955 Posts

There is nothing new besides the time attack mode and multiplayer power ups. Remakes need more than just a coat of paint. The game is still cool, but I would not call it a killer app.

gamenerd15

Agreed.
As much as I was excited for OoT3D, I don't see myself playing it again after completing it. I doubt it'll be any different with SF643D.

Avatar image for FPS1337
FPS1337

2519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#16 FPS1337
Member since 2009 • 2519 Posts
I think Gamespot will give it an 8-8.5 but I never listen to GS reviews, if it looks fun I try it, some of my favourite games have iffy reviews.
Avatar image for cboyuno
cboyuno

647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#17 cboyuno
Member since 2007 • 647 Posts

[QUOTE="gamenerd15"]

There is nothing new besides the time attack mode and multiplayer power ups. Remakes need more than just a coat of paint. The game is still cool, but I would not call it a killer app.

ANIMEguy10034

Agreed.
As much as I was excited for OoT3D, I don't see myself playing it again after completing it. I doubt it'll be any different with SF643D.

actually im playing OoT 3D again and plan to play a third time on master quest. Im not even the kind of gamer that usually replays games.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#18 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11796 Posts

Lacking online mulitplayer is bad.....

Does it atleast have LAN multiplayer?!?

If not, I will be skipping it unless I can find it less than $15. I won't pay full price for a game that should have online multiplayer but doesn't, that is for sure!

It kinda seems like I will be skipping it until it is super cheap.

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#19 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36390 Posts
I'll end up getting this, but probably not in September. Hopefully someone picks this up for my for my birthday or Christmas though :).
Avatar image for DEVILinIRON
DEVILinIRON

8788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 DEVILinIRON
Member since 2006 • 8788 Posts
I'll end up getting this, but probably not in September. Haziqonfire
Same. I'm going to wait on this one.
Avatar image for daiyume
daiyume

324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 daiyume
Member since 2011 • 324 Posts

Debating about whether to pick this one up new or buy used since I already have it on the N64 and Virtual Console (Wii). Although I have OoT on many platforms as well, it just seemed like a remake with much longer lasting appeal and a bigger overall package to justify the $40 price tag than a game like SF64 3D would.

Avatar image for DARKNESSxEAGLE
DARKNESSxEAGLE

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#22 DARKNESSxEAGLE
Member since 2010 • 489 Posts

Even if it had wifi, I'd still wait. But if anyone's yet to play the previous versions and owns a 3ds then there is no reason to get this soon.

Avatar image for Rod90
Rod90

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Rod90
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts

There is nothing new besides the time attack mode and multiplayer power ups. Remakes need more than just a coat of paint. The game is still cool, but I would not call it a killer app.

gamenerd15
Sadly, I agree with you.
Avatar image for GAMBIT1551
GAMBIT1551

384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 GAMBIT1551
Member since 2010 • 384 Posts

I'll get this once I get a 3DS (probably for christmas). love starfox 64.

Avatar image for glimpus
glimpus

2306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#25 glimpus
Member since 2004 • 2306 Posts

I'm glad it's a mostly positive review. I'm sure the games a blast.

I remember playing it at a friends, we enjoyed the "independence day" level. sucks about the lack of online play, i think nintendo really has to pick it up in the online play department, but other than that this is the next 3DS game I'll buy. (Strange how the only other game I have is also a remake. A remake of quite possibly the best game of all time mind you, but a remake nonetheless.)

Avatar image for CaptainAhab13
CaptainAhab13

5121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#26 CaptainAhab13
Member since 2010 • 5121 Posts
A 9?! :shock: For a remake?
Avatar image for Nozizaki
Nozizaki

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#27 Nozizaki
Member since 2007 • 1471 Posts

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]I'll end up getting this, but probably not in September. DEVILinIRON
Same. I'm going to wait on this one.

I thirdendary this.

Avatar image for Kenny789
Kenny789

10434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#28 Kenny789
Member since 2006 • 10434 Posts
Great score but I can't imagine it getting a 9 here and I don't see any reason why it should. 7.5 to 8.0 seems like a decent score for an enhanced port with no wi-fi play.
Avatar image for EliteCouncilor
EliteCouncilor

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 EliteCouncilor
Member since 2008 • 242 Posts

Now, I have to decide between Oot and Starfox...which one should I get?

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

34807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 34807 Posts
I doubt this game deserves a 9.
Avatar image for Mii_ller
Mii_ller

238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Mii_ller
Member since 2011 • 238 Posts

this review is from a Starfox fangirl. What do you guys expect.

I was going to get this, but the lack of online is just stupid. maybe for christmas or something.

Avatar image for SRTtoZ
SRTtoZ

4800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 SRTtoZ
Member since 2009 • 4800 Posts

Good review but I am staying far away from this guy for now...I have 3 ports already for the 3DS, ill hold off for something original while OOT keeps me hooked.

Avatar image for Rod90
Rod90

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 Rod90
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts

this review is from a Starfox fangirl. What do you guys expect.

I was going to get this, but the lack of online is just stupid. maybe for christmas or something.

Mii_ller
She is a starfox fangirl? how do you know?
Avatar image for Kirbside
Kirbside

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Kirbside
Member since 2005 • 314 Posts

Yeah. Perhaps she is a Nintendo fan ;)

Avatar image for Rod90
Rod90

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Rod90
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts

Yeah. Perhaps she is a Nintendo fan ;)

Kirbside
Ah??
Avatar image for Aquat1cF1sh
Aquat1cF1sh

11096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 Aquat1cF1sh
Member since 2006 • 11096 Posts
That's a good review, definitely more interested in getting it.
Avatar image for DustinTheWind
DustinTheWind

4392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 DustinTheWind
Member since 2002 • 4392 Posts

I loved this game, but the main story is beatable in one sitting. The multiplayer dogfights were awesome, I spent hours battling friends, and I was damn good at it. So very disappointing that there's no online. This would have been my next purchase.

Avatar image for DustinTheWind
DustinTheWind

4392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 DustinTheWind
Member since 2002 • 4392 Posts
I doubt this game deserves a 9.Litchie
Going by the original, it does deserve a 9. It's a great game. The lack of online is the only downside, but (for me) it's enough to not buy it.
Avatar image for glimpus
glimpus

2306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#39 glimpus
Member since 2004 • 2306 Posts

Now, I have to decide between Oot and Starfox...which one should I get?

EliteCouncilor

OoT. Then Star Fox :)

Avatar image for gamefan67
gamefan67

10034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#40 gamefan67
Member since 2004 • 10034 Posts

I still don't see how a remake that did nothing more than up the graphics received a 9.

Jelley0
Because it is still a good game? What is so hard to believe?
Avatar image for darth-pyschosis
darth-pyschosis

9322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 darth-pyschosis
Member since 2006 • 9322 Posts
[QUOTE="gamenerd15"]

There is nothing new besides the time attack mode and multiplayer power ups. Remakes need more than just a coat of paint. The game is still cool, but I would not call it a killer app.

DJ_Lae
Can't argue. I can't believe IGN gave what is little more than a barebones port a 9. I can't believe anyone is actually going to buy it, it's just giving Nintendo the thumbs up that lazy ports are okay.

It's a port of a good game. is it that hard to understand the game may be that good even as an old game? Also, key feature here for Star Fox fans, you can now CHOOSE the story path and difficulty path instead of having to do optional objectives to earn them. So basically you can get the multiple endings and all the levels without worrying if you messed up somewhere in a stage. Yes, I wish there was online play, but the graphics look terrific and the fact is it's still a great game and it's the first remake of it. This isn't Rayman 2 after all. Also, get over the ports and remakes already. It happens. The 360 got so many Xbox ports in its first year. All consoles get a boat load of ports/remakes as devs get acquainted with the hardware. It's not uncommon, it will happen on every platform going forward and is something that just stops after a year or so. Another fact is Star Fox's franchise depends on this remake. If it doesn't capture an audience than no more Fox McCloud. Nintendo already tried mixing up the formula, keeping things the same, and doing both with the last 3 games and nothing satisfied gamers so a remake makes a lot of sense IMO.
Avatar image for Omega_Zero69
Omega_Zero69

13668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Omega_Zero69
Member since 2006 • 13668 Posts
Wow a 9 for a remake GS might give it a 8.5 for not having multiplayer.
Avatar image for DARKNESSxEAGLE
DARKNESSxEAGLE

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 DARKNESSxEAGLE
Member since 2010 • 489 Posts

So, how many of you that said 'A 9? For a remake?' actually owned the N64 or Wii VC version?

Avatar image for logicalfrank
logicalfrank

1686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 96

User Lists: 0

#44 logicalfrank
Member since 2011 • 1686 Posts

The N64 version was one of the most fun games ever for offline multiplayer. I'd be excited for the chance of online multiplayer to be able to try it w/o being able to glance at the other person's screen and tell where they were... W/o that, I might pick this up used someday but otherwise, I'll just stick w/ my original N64 cart, thank you.


In general, is it possible to have some of these games be updated via download to include some features they lack now or should we pretty much expect for games w/ no online multiplayer to remian w/o online multiplayer forever more?

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#45 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11796 Posts

So, how many of you that said 'A 9? For a remake?' actually owned the N64 or Wii VC version?

DARKNESSxEAGLE

I had it on N64 and beat it everyway possible.

Do I think it deserves a 9.... No it doesn't even have online, which for a game like this, would be perfect for.

If it had online, and was a great port, and even utilized the 3d decently, then yes, I would give it a 9, because Star Fox 64 was a game I had a great deal of fun with by myself and with my friends, (back during the Star Fox, Goldeneye times)

Avatar image for Aqua3D-Player
Aqua3D-Player

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Aqua3D-Player
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Looks good for me.
Avatar image for LaytonsCat
LaytonsCat

3652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#47 LaytonsCat
Member since 2010 • 3652 Posts

I'm calling a 7 here and $40 dollars in my poket even though its a good game

Avatar image for DJ_Lae
DJ_Lae

42748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#48 DJ_Lae
Member since 2002 • 42748 Posts
Another fact is Star Fox's franchise depends on this remake. If it doesn't capture an audience than no more Fox McCloud. Nintendo already tried mixing up the formula, keeping things the same, and doing both with the last 3 games and nothing satisfied gamers so a remake makes a lot of sense IMO.darth-pyschosis
I'll be honest - Miyamoto's remark is a large part of why I have no interest in buying this remake until it dips below $20. If the future of Star Fox depends on people buying this remake, then I hope it dies. Holding a franchise hostage and then expecting people to shell out $40 for an experience that only lasts a few hours is ridiculous, especially when most of the legwork on the game was done back on the N64. It's downright insulting. There is a new coat of polish on the 3DS version, but it's not even close to $40 worth, especially with the halfhearted multiplayer. Ocarina of Time's update was barely worth $40, but at the same time, that game held up a lot better in terms of its core content.
Avatar image for kirkonacid
kirkonacid

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#49 kirkonacid
Member since 2010 • 486 Posts

I'm glad it did good. I never played the original so I'm excited to try it out, but right now, it is between this and Dead Island and I really want Dead Island.

Avatar image for SuperFlakeman
SuperFlakeman

7411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 SuperFlakeman
Member since 2011 • 7411 Posts

[QUOTE="gamenerd15"]

There is nothing new besides the time attack mode and multiplayer power ups. Remakes need more than just a coat of paint. The game is still cool, but I would not call it a killer app.

DJ_Lae

Can't argue. I can't believe IGN gave what is little more than a barebones port a 9. I can't believe anyone is actually going to buy it, it's just giving Nintendo the thumbs up that lazy ports are okay.

Dude you are contradicting yourself. A port would be the same game re-packaged, so by definition that's lazy.

You probably mean that this is a lazy remake.

OoT 3D is also a remake, deal with it. 8)