soo Jenga gets rated...

Gamespot STILL hasn't reviewed Final Fantasy XII for the DS, and that was released on November 20th, so yeah... they suck.The_Pig_Hostage

I guess Jenga was just higher on their priority list... somehow

Jenga paid for a rating, and QUICK!l8bitz

I'd be angry then if I was the company, if they paid for a rating it seems like they'd get a better score (imo) what would be the advantage to paying for a game to get rated faster if it was rated badly, would hurt sales.

[QUOTE="l8bitz"]Jenga paid for a rating, and QUICK!kidrock17xp

I'd be angry then if I was the company, if they paid for a rating it seems like they'd get a better score (imo) what would be the advantage to paying for a game to get rated faster if it was rated badly, would hurt sales.

Yeah but it scored a 2.0... so I don't think it really mattered...

i didn't even know there was a jenga game. that's a terrible idea :|AJC3317

and gamespot just couldn't wait to play it lol

IMO, games like Jen-crap are reviewed quicker because there's actually nothing to review, is there? I agree that they take centuries to review games that are worth it, Bleach: Blade of Fate for the DS just got reviewed and it was released in October (if im not wrong), and there aren't reviews for FFXII: RW, DBZBT 3, Soul Calibur Legends...and so many.

Yes it seems like GS gives better rating when it's a big company...9.5 for Halo 3 is way too much..if there's nothing new with it except better graphics...same enemies, same weapons, same Master Chief..GS always complain about sequels doing the same than predecessors and they dont even mention it with Halo 3, but Metroid Prime 3 gets a ridiculous 8.5? WTF..

So yeah, GS should begin to make BETTER reviews ¬¬

How long should it taketo decide a piece of crap is a piece of crap?