i think they'll give it about 9.3, even though it has better controls, supports widescreen and 480p, all the features from both games and the GC graphics, which were better than the ps2's, they'll mark it down for some stupid reason probably cause its a 2 year old game...but if its still good what does it matter? they shouldnt mark things down by saying stuff like they haven't aged well, like they do with VC games, wtf do they expect? 360 graphics on a snes game...
anyway thats probably what they'll do but i may be proven wrong, then again it is GS and it is on a Nintendo console...
I say it gets in the mid or low 8's. Maybe even the 7's because it is the fourth release of the game so far.
With Wii games, it seems like it is going to be hard to break into the 9's unless the controls are really exceptional. And from what I've read of RE4 the controls are good but not great.
GS will give it the same score they gave the best Wii games, TP and SPM--8.8. Then again, if a different editor had reviewed TP, I think it would of gotten a higher score. I think the 8.8 was appropriate for SPM. RE4-a Wii-make-shouldn't get a higher score than those two games. Then again all three were originally made to fit the GC...lol. I'm still getting it though! So GS will give RE4 an 8.8 and all the other sites will give it a 9+ lol
The lowered price-tag will guarantee it'll stay within the 8.0-9.0 range if Capcom doesn't screw anything up in the porting process like they did their PC release...
I am predicting high AA. It will probably get a low score for being old and having chunky controls or something like that.Phanrang
they've already stated that they loved the controls... but then again the people saying this might not have the same opinion as the person reviewing it...
[QUOTE="Phanrang"]I am predicting high AA. It will probably get a low score for being old and having chunky controls or something like that.lilsmurfaroonie
they've already stated that they loved the controls... but then again the people saying this might not have the same opinion as the person reviewing it...
they always say a game is excellent in the previews but when it comes down to the review they rate it lowly. for example in wario master of disguise:
"Its clear that the minigames have a huge variety which means you will not get bored easily.
now in the review...
"The minigames are so repeptitive to the point of numbness"
All t is is a PS2 Rip...... i dont see it gettingto much higher or lower than the original score for ps2... but iw would like tosee how this game turns out though
it'll get mark down for; dated graphics, arm gets tired because you have to keep it pointed at the screen, waggle controls add very little to the experience, aiming can be awkward, haven't we seen this twice before? Ok that's a few too many but i'm sure some of those will be in there.
I "/ignore" GS, 1up, EGM, and Gameinformers' scores... Gamespot is trying to spot faults against the game... It'll likely score an 8.0/10 or 7.9/10 from Gamespot ._.
Log in to comment