This topic is locked from further discussion.
Zelda games are always easy. I died once in Wind Waker and that was because i accidentally lost the grip of the controller lol.ArnalionZelda isn't really easy. You just don't die a lot. I have never died on Windwaker or OOT or Twilight. That was probably the easiest one. It's just challenging on some puzzles and get frustrating for some parts of the game. imo.
I thought each zelda game was getting easier and easier. I mean at leat in WW i got hit, lost hearts used fairies. I didn't die in WW at all sicne 2 fairies always kept me going forever. In TP i never died since most bad guys only took off 1/4 heart piece. Thats 4 hits per heart, and with 10 hearts, I'd have to get hit 40 times to die. Plus the land is full of hearts to fill up with. Oot was harder, but still barron in terms of big open area with very little bad guys filling in the space. I could run through most of all three games on the horses or boat and never get hit.
I hope in the next one, it is more challenging.
Ocarina of Time was amazing for it's time. I think Twilight Princess is better if you compare them both now; not how great Ocarina of Time was back then.
Lol IMO TP's dungeons are harder (even when comparing to the MQ version).
But thats because I remember everything from OOT :P
Difficulty Wise(Hardest to easiest):
MM>TP>OOT>WW
100% completion:
WW>MM>OOT>TP
I have played trough OOT and WW atleast 5 times.
MM and TP only once but I am playing trough TP again (I just got the Master Sword)
Anyone who thinks Twilight Princess is the better game is really being convinced by the graphics. The core gameplay was basically the same, minus the wolf parts which I didn't hate but I could have done without. Sure Ocarina of Time had nostalgia going for it with lots of people, but I was too young to actually play an open world game and have success. I played it after Twilight Princess, so if anything, the "been there, done that" feeling was going AGAINST it. Still I enjoyed Ocarina of Time far more, and found to be an all in all superior game. It's just absolute gaming bliss, something I doubt we will ever top again.
Ya every 3-D Zelda game is amazing, and Majora's Mask, Wind Waker, and Twilight Princess might be extremely close to being as good as Ocarina of Time, but the fact is, they can't top it. No game since it has been as good, and unless they come up with some magical new mind blowing idea (which is what I'm hoping for out of the next new Zelda), no one will ever top Ocarina of Time. In fact the only people, in my opinion, who can make a game that good is the Zelda team, so if a better game is to be made, they'll have to top themselves. Ya I have my other favorites that all rival Ocarina of Time and make me wanna declare it the new best game ever (most recently Little King's Story, and when I played it, Majora's Mask), but when all is said and done I don't think I'll say that these current favorites are as good as Ocarina of Time.
Don't get me wrong, I want nothing more than the next Legend of Zelda to top Ocarina of Time. It is possible, and if anyone can do it, it's the Zelda team. I just seriously doubt it will. However if the spirit girl thing that seems to be within the Master Sword in the concept art is a creative new idea, they have a shot at it. If anything can make me expect a great new game, it's this artwork.
It can't come soon enough.
Sooooooooo... wanna answer the question? Which is better? Because, not to be rude, I highly doubt anyone here cares about your 100% completions and playing the game over again.Lol IMO TP's dungeons are harder (even when comparing to the MQ version).
But thats because I remember everything from OOT :P
Difficulty Wise(Hardest to easiest):
MM>TP>OOT>WW
100% completion:
WW>MM>OOT>TP
I have played trough OOT and WW atleast 5 times.
MM and TP only once but I am playing trough TP again (I just got the Master Sword)
KingBowser91
I eagerly awaited Twilight Princess like any good Zelda fan...longing to relive the excitement I experienced when I first played through OoT so long ago. Majora's Mask had given me a taste of that....Wind Waker not so much, but TP looked to finally bring back that classic style and expansive world that I loved.
Well, after having played through TP, and then having gone back and played through OoT for a second time, I am still convinced that OoT is the superior game. TP came close, but the level of difficulty just wasn't there...especially toward the end of the game. I flew through the last few dungeons and the final boss battle without losing a single life! Playing OoT for the second time, I died twice on the final boss, and I had already beaten this game before! Also..maybe it's because the TP world is just too expansive, but much of it felt empty to me....there was no reason to go exploring much of Hyrule Field, because it was largely barren, while when I played OoT I was constantly seeing heart pieces I didn't know how to reach or rocks I couldn't move. The latter quality is similar to Wind Waker's large and mostly empty ocean...a larger world is only good if the density of objects and puzzles remains the same, IMHO.
Anyway...the point of this post was to see what other fans thought, and also to encourage everyone to go back and play through OoT again. I'd also love to hear from someone who played TP without having played OoT, and then d/loaded and played OoT on the VC (if such a person exists). If you haven't played OoT, go get a copy now and play this game!
CADMBFan
I actually meet those qualifications, TC. I'd have to say that I like TP more, just because of the fact that OoT seems a bit dated for me. If I had actually gamed back when OoT just came out, I'd probably like OoT more, since it had a bigger impact on the gaming community than TP. For me, though, TP is more memorable.
[QUOTE="KingBowser91"]
Lol IMO TP's dungeons are harder (even when comparing to the MQ version).
But thats because I remember everything from OOT :P
Difficulty Wise(Hardest to easiest):
MM>TP>OOT>WW
100% completion:
WW>MM>OOT>TP
I have played trough OOT and WW atleast 5 times.
MM and TP only once but I am playing trough TP again (I just got the Master Sword)
Sooooooooo... wanna answer the question? Which is better? Because, not to be rude, I highly doubt anyone here cares about your 100% completions and playing the game over again. IMO they are both great and all 4 (excluding PH) 3-D Zelda games are equal.[QUOTE="bobdood99"]
welll if u look on gamespot TP got something like an 8.9 if i remember correctly. and OoT N64 get a perfect 10. it is way better. best game eva
[/QUOTE
people really need to get out of this state of mind. Just because gamespot ranks it higher doesn't mean it is a better game. People need to use their own opinions sometimes.
MM was WAAAYYYYY!!!!!!!!!! harder than OOT. OOT was much harder than WW and WW was harder than TP.
TP did have the best story though, but it felt a bit empty at times. now that the the Wii has more ram we can most likely see more things on screen this time around.
How easy meter (hehe)
MM>>>>>>>OOT>WW>>TP
This is the Nintendo Wii board and a thread about Zelda. Now kindly fukc off.http://wet.bethsoft.com?fbid=MsrFDYre2e6
chech it out!!! this is going to be a good game!!!
nonamestochoose
OoT. Putting my bias aside, it does genuinely surprise me that people are saying that TP had a better story.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment