I did stay on point, you just can't grasp to point of an "analogy" I am stating that both systems haven't used the potential they have at the level it should be at. If you are going to spend 5 years working on a new controller then yes, I think people deserve a bit better than point and click and a few other things. You are just getting confused thinking that I am comparing Sega vs Nintendo as a whole. I am not doubting that 32X sucked and that it didn't go nowhere. I am just saying that it is similar in the fact that very few games showcase the system. I did not say that I hated SMG, SSMB, Fire Emblem, Mario Kart, or anything else. Those games don't showcase the remote . The only game I did not give respect to is Monkey Ball. Also well done with the Wiimote. As far as trolling and flaming the Wii forums, no I haven't done that, people ask why do you think about X about the wii, I give an opinion and that is it. It seems to me that a lot of wii owners can't take that some people might have a few problems with your "successful" white box.
How many games are out for wii like 300? How many of those really put the controller to the test? Even if there are 20 to 30 games out there that are good and do some cool things, that still is a relatively low number compared to how many games are available out.
Yes you are right, it is a matter of opinion. If spending 40 dollars on light gun arcade games that were made 5 to 10 years ago is your thing then more power to you. When I made the comparison, I wasn't bashing the wii, 32X could have been cool but it wasn't. I am trying to stick up for wii and say it can be and do more than what it is. If people are just satisfied with point and click with waggle, the developers will never expand.
It is funny how you claim that I attack the wii, but you made personal posts just for me and Wild Card, just to say our views were off topic and you were right.
I never even said X system is better than Wii. As a matter of fact I am disappointed with all 3 systems. None of them lived up to anything half of what they were supposed to.
If you really wanted to know what I expected from Wii I will tell you.
I expected that most of my actions would be realistic to the way it would feel in real life. I mean yes, I expected to move a character in a game would use an analog stick. Let's say it's an adventure game and I go up to a door, I should to open the door turn the wiimote like door knob and not push a button or waggle. if my guy has a sword I should be able to swing it left or right with my wiimote and it shouldn't take 4 times to register with the sensor bar. Shooting with wii has been done well. you point and push a button to shoot. Obviously if it is a move that uses the characters legs, I wouldn't expect you to kick with the wii mote. Fishing with zelda should have been more than wait for the bait to drop in the water and immediately pull it back out to snag a fish. It shouldn't take 4 downward motions with the nunchuck to make him do the spinning blade move. You should have been able to do that move by spinning the wiimote in a circle. That would have made more sense. Since it would be realistic to the way you would have done it, if you were actually him. I don't mean spin your whole body around either, I just mean do a circular motion with the wiimote itself. Since he spins in a circle, that would have made sense. In a racing, yes the tilting makes sense because it simulates turning, but when you go off track into the dirt, you don't have to turn harder or faster to get back on the road like it would really happen. In fighting games like bleach that was nothing but waggle and not actually doing the moves like they are done in the show. In Wii sports you don't throw the ball in baseball like in a real game, you just wave down. Last time I checked you didn't wave down to pitch a ball in real life. In tennis, it doesn't matter how slow or fast you swing the wiimote, your character swings at the same speed. Last time I checked, the faster you moved the harder a ball got hit in real tennis. The bowling actually does play like bowling and the golf actually does play like golf so props to that also.
They could make a game with swimming and you could push your left and right arms out and back like in real life for the game. and not just keep waving your arms because that's either and simpler for people to remember. I am not all against waggle in MP3 when you waggled to get a boss off of you made sense since you would push and squirm in real life.
How do you know what systems I even have? For all you know I could still only have ps2 and other last gen systems? All I have done is say that the wii could be a lot better. I am actually saying that I believe in Wii, want to play, and are saddened by the lack passion the developers have including Nintendo. I am also saddened by the fact that millions of people are satisfied with the quality that has been offered so far.
All you wii fans do is defend it no matter if something is bad or isn't. At least you aren't trying to say the game Crus'n is super cool like that one other guy. Yes now I am flaming him because seriously, Crus'n?
Most controls on wii don't play like how they would in real life.
Log in to comment