I say we fill the slot and keep the officers we have....on one condition. I want the officers to be more forthcoming with us regular folk here at GUFU. No more of this cloak and dagger nonsense. If it's something that you as officers feel needs to be hidden then I don't think it's something GUFU should be doing.Ibacai
Agrees. Not much good comes out of hiding things.
Doing a whole election again would kind of be a pain in the butt and I really don't see why any of the other officers need to be replaced. The whole AK ban dodging thing wasn't that big of a deal at least IMO. Just fill subs spot and lets get this business behind us.hellsing321
i'm skeptical that just replacing sub's position would put an end to the issues that lead to the incident. it's just a delay till the next person feels wronged.
[QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]No Sub tried to wrong us.Plain simply it will be explained later on here.but simply put Just go ahead and fill the spot.Ontain
I see wrong on both sides. to place the blame only on sub will not be good for the long run.
There is fault on both sides, but sub was overwhelmingly the responsible party for the entire incident leading to his departure, cakes departure, and all this drama nonsense. I agree there needs to be more transparency, but this is nothing to panic over. It's a small incident blown out of proportion by the misbehavior of one individual.[QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]No Sub tried to wrong us.Plain simply it will be explained later on here.but simply put Just go ahead and fill the spot.Hoffgod
I see wrong on both sides. to place the blame only on sub will not be good for the long run.
There is fault on both sides, but sub was overwhelmingly the responsible party for the entire incident leading to his departure, cakes departure, and all this drama nonsense. I agree there needs to be more transparency, but this is nothing to panic over. It's a small incident blown out of proportion by the misbehavior of one individual. I'm sorry Hoff but I'm going to have to disagree on all points here. There were three people responsible for the start of this situation, we know which ones. And saying Sub is responsible for Cake leaving is completely ridiculous as he left for reasons outside of the initial argument. The TOU violation might have come to light because of Sub but blaming him is wrong. And while the incident may be blown out of proportion it definitely wasn't done by the misbehavior of only one member.[QUOTE="Hoffgod"][QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]No Sub tried to wrong us.Plain simply it will be explained later on here.but simply put Just go ahead and fill the spot.Ibacai
I see wrong on both sides. to place the blame only on sub will not be good for the long run.
There is fault on both sides, but sub was overwhelmingly the responsible party for the entire incident leading to his departure, cakes departure, and all this drama nonsense. I agree there needs to be more transparency, but this is nothing to panic over. It's a small incident blown out of proportion by the misbehavior of one individual. I'm sorry Hoff but I'm going to have to disagree on all points here. There were three people responsible for the start of this situation, we know which ones. And saying Sub is responsible for Cake leaving is completely ridiculous as he left for reasons outside of the initial argument. The TOU violation might have come to light because of Sub but blaming him is wrong. And while the incident may be blown out of proportion it definitely wasn't done by the misbehavior of only one member.I guess you have a different interpretation of the events than me, then.[QUOTE="Hoffgod"][QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]No Sub tried to wrong us.Plain simply it will be explained later on here.but simply put Just go ahead and fill the spot.Ibacai
I see wrong on both sides. to place the blame only on sub will not be good for the long run.
There is fault on both sides, but sub was overwhelmingly the responsible party for the entire incident leading to his departure, cakes departure, and all this drama nonsense. I agree there needs to be more transparency, but this is nothing to panic over. It's a small incident blown out of proportion by the misbehavior of one individual. I'm sorry Hoff but I'm going to have to disagree on all points here. There were three people responsible for the start of this situation, we know which ones. And saying Sub is responsible for Cake leaving is completely ridiculous as he left for reasons outside of the initial argument. The TOU violation might have come to light because of Sub but blaming him is wrong. And while the incident may be blown out of proportion it definitely wasn't done by the misbehavior of only one member.hey Ib im going to have to disagree with you to some degree haha.Yes there was wrong from both sides but 2 admitted that they were wrong,Sub didn't help to solve the problem instead it kept going.then it escelated to sub leaveing and got cake to leave as well both on bad notes if i might add.Anyways you'll hear a clear explination from game in the others tomorrow im sure of it.But as i said before Just fill the open spot and move on from there.
[QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]hey Ib im going to have to disagree with you to some degree haha.Yes there was wrong from both sides but 2 admitted that they were wrong,Sub didn't help to solve the problem instead it kept going.then it escelated to sub leaveing and got cake to leave as well both on bad notes if i might add.Anyways you'll hear a clear explination from game in the others tomorrow im sure of it. But as i said before Just fill the open spot and move on from there.IbacaiThis is the part that gets me. Are you saying that Cake left because Sub left?
Sub and GUFU's higher ups contributed to Cake's departure. End of story. To continue to argue who was more in fault is pointless since both Sub and Cake are gone. Further discussion on this matter won't benefit anybody.
With that said, in the long run, this AK incident is not really worth the energy put into it. As I stated before, the whole issue was based on miscommunication. All I have to say to the higher ups is just fill the slot, learn from your mistakes and start becoming more upfront with your fellow GUFU members.
I don't think revoting everyone is the best approach. What I do think though is that you really need to rethink how the union is run, no more secrets, no more acting so it feels as though officers are better than us members by using their powers to lock threads without good explinations, not to mention good reasons.
Also stop dealing with everything behind the scenes, we are all members of GUFU and we can all handle a little public drama now and again, and I think it's way better to resolve things quick and publicly rather than having it go the way it did now.
It would also be beneficial to have an offsite forum where officers as well as members can talk over the more sensitive stuff regarding union management in private without having to worry about GS Mods or public eyes, not that I'm saying we should break any rules, but at least we can openly discuss issues like AK's account without bringing it to light for the whole of gamespot to see.
You officers should really realise that a lot of the members at GUFU are good people, they can contribute even though they aren't officers, such as help run the different clans, give an alternative view on different subjects or assist with management where it's needed. If this was a public union which allowed anyone to join then the way you are doing things would be more justified, but since GUFU follows a pretty strickt recruitment process I believe ever member deserve a say in any and all matters.
If you are going to name one or more new officers I think it should be voted on, but I believe you will all shape up after this and because of that I don't see any reason to throw you all to the curb.
Amen my firend.I don't think revoting everyone is the best approach. What I do think though is that you really need to rethink how the union is run, no more secrets, no more acting so it feels as though officers are better than us members by using their powers to lock threads without good explinations, not to mention good reasons.
Also stop dealing with everything behind the scenes, we are all members of GUFU and we can all handle a little public drama now and again, and I think it's way better to resolve things quick and publicly rather than having it go the way it did now.
It would also be beneficial to have an offsite forum where officers as well as members can talk over the more sensitive stuff regarding union management in private without having to worry about GS Mods or public eyes, not that I'm saying we should break any rules, but at least we can openly discuss issues like AK's account without bringing it to light for the whole of gamespot to see.
You officers should really realise that a lot of the members at GUFU are good people, they can contribute even though they aren't officers, such as help run the different clans, give an alternative view on different subjects or assist with management where it's needed. If this was a public union which allowed anyone to join then the way you are doing things would be more justified, but since GUFU follows a pretty strickt recruitment process I believe ever member deserve a say in any and all matters.
If you are going to name one or more new officers I think it should be voted on, but I believe you will all shape up after this and because of that I don't see any reason to throw you all to the curb.
Cook66
[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]hey Ib im going to have to disagree with you to some degree haha.Yes there was wrong from both sides but 2 admitted that they were wrong,Sub didn't help to solve the problem instead it kept going.then it escelated to sub leaveing and got cake to leave as well both on bad notes if i might add.Anyways you'll hear a clear explination from game in the others tomorrow im sure of it. But as i said before Just fill the open spot and move on from there.Heil68This is the part that gets me. Are you saying that Cake left because Sub left? Sub dropped the dime on AK to Cake..Cake left because of action done, or rather not done by the GUFU management. Sub either told Cake directly or Cake read the IRC logs and figured it out for himself.
Cake left because of action done, or rather not done by the GUFU management. Sub either told Cake directly or Cake read the IRC logs and figured it out for himself.Cook66
*Sigh* Who cares anymore. Whats done is done. everyone who was involved acted a little absurdly, but we are humans. Just because we have the Officer tag doesn't mean we don't make mistakes sometimes. So lets try to move on. In the meantime, Anyone who would like to become an officer should get ready. Because either way, We have a slot we need to elect to.
[QUOTE="Cook66"]Cake left because of action done, or rather not done by the GUFU management. Sub either told Cake directly or Cake read the IRC logs and figured it out for himself.jechtshot78
*Sigh* Who cares anymore. Whats done is done. everyone who was involved acted a little absurdly, but we are humans. Just because we have the Officer tag doesn't mean we don't make mistakes sometimes. So lets try to move on. In the meantime, Anyone who would like to become an officer should get ready. Because either way, We have a slot we need to elect to.
I wasn't trying to put any more blame on you, I simply answered the his question, whats the problem with that?
Whats done is done and I really see no harm in letting those few members unaware of what happen know as well.
And when you ask I actually do care that Cake left over this, and I'm sure many others do as well.
Also stop dealing with everything behind the scenes, we are all members of GUFU and we can all handle a little public drama now and again, and I think it's way better to resolve things quick and publicly rather than having it go the way it did now.Cook66Agree. Little bits of drama spread over time > big bits of unnecessary drama.
sonicare sort of stated it:
But, basically, 3 officers fought, sub named a ban dodger that apparently the officers knew about.
sub left due to the conflict (i'm pretty sure that's it), and cake left as a result of learning that a possible bandodger had been hiding under his nose with people who knew about it not telling him.
I think that's pretty much it.
Edit: The bandodger was in the union, too, I think that's a big part of the problem.
sonicare sort of stated it:
But, basically, 3 officers fought, sub named a ban dodger that apparently the officers knew about.
sub left due to the conflict (i'm pretty sure that's it), and cake left as a result of learning that a possible bandodger had been hiding under his nose with people who knew about it not telling him.
I think that's pretty much it.
Edit: The bandodger was in the union, too, I think that's a big part of the problem.
Jandurin
You're doing it all wrong, Jandurin! You have to make it sound more epic, like LoTR only with cussing and Halo 3.
Well we all know Fuzzy can do the job well. If we just fill in the slot give him the place.
However I have nothing against an election many members here seem to be good candidates.
I don't think the GUFU officers were bashing subrosian. Sub and 2 others got into a heated argument, but no one was using the IRC or other things to specifically bash subrosian. Arguments happen. Especially on the net. It just got a little out of hand. I'm fine with the current officers and think fuzzy would be good for sub's spot since fuzzy was an officer in the past.sonicare
I think what really pissed sub off was how jecht kicked him from IRC. at that point the issue was no longer about halo3. it was about the politics of the guild leadership and how there was favoritism, abuse of powers, and elitism. now i'm not saying all of the acqusations are valid since i'm not privy to officer chat but i doubt that GUFU is entirely free of that either.
[QUOTE="sonicare"]I don't think the GUFU officers were bashing subrosian. Sub and 2 others got into a heated argument, but no one was using the IRC or other things to specifically bash subrosian. Arguments happen. Especially on the net. It just got a little out of hand. I'm fine with the current officers and think fuzzy would be good for sub's spot since fuzzy was an officer in the past.Ontain
I think what really pissed sub off was how jecht kicked him from IRC. at that point the issue was no longer about halo3. it was about the politics of the guild leadership and how there was favoritism, abuse of powers, and elitism. now i'm not saying all of the acqusations are valid since i'm not privy to officer chat but i doubt that GUFU is entirely free of that either.
I don't know about that. I've gotten into discussions with sub in which I challanged his views and he did not respond well. He tends to get antagonistic, defensive, and adopts a "me vs everyone else" attitude when challanged. For example, I challanged his views on the Wii and he responded in a very harsh manner, including basically saying that Nintendo doesn't care about hardcore gamers anymore and anyone who thinks otherwise is a Nintendo apologist. Jecht kicking him from IRC didn't help, that's for sure. But all it did was add fuel to sub's fire. Sorry if this seems like I'm bashing sub a lot, but that's what he acts like. At other times he's an intelligent, thoughtful poster, but honestly challange him, and it's like a switch flips...[QUOTE="sonicare"]I don't think the GUFU officers were bashing subrosian. Sub and 2 others got into a heated argument, but no one was using the IRC or other things to specifically bash subrosian. Arguments happen. Especially on the net. It just got a little out of hand. I'm fine with the current officers and think fuzzy would be good for sub's spot since fuzzy was an officer in the past.Ontain
I think what really pissed sub off was how jecht kicked him from IRC. at that point the issue was no longer about halo3. it was about the politics of the guild leadership and how there was favoritism, abuse of powers, and elitism. now i'm not saying all of the acqusations are valid since i'm not privy to officer chat but i doubt that GUFU is entirely free of that either.
True, in that context it did seem a little premature to boot sub from the IRC. Again, I don't know the full history there so I'm judging it without all the facts.
[QUOTE="Cook66"]Cake left because of action done, or rather not done by the GUFU management. Sub either told Cake directly or Cake read the IRC logs and figured it out for himself.jechtshot78
So lets try to move on. In the meantime, Anyone who would like to become an officer should get ready. Because either way, We have a slot we need to elect to.
I've been ready lol.I don't know about that. I've gotten into discussions with sub in which I challanged his views and he did not respond well. He tends to get antagonistic, defensive, and adopts a "me vs everyone else" attitude when challanged. For example, I challanged his views on the Wii and he responded in a very harsh manner, including basically saying that Nintendo doesn't care about hardcore gamers anymore and anyone who thinks otherwise is a Nintendo apologist. Jecht kicking him from IRC didn't help, that's for sure. But all it did was add fuel to sub's fire. Sorry if this seems like I'm bashing sub a lot, but that's what he acts like. At other times he's an intelligent, thoughtful poster, but honestly challange him, and it's like a switch flips...Hoffgod
Me vs Sub, the "Are video game toys?" thread gave me that same impression. Then again, I flipped more than he did.
Guys, lets not turn this into a bashing thread. What's done is done and I'm not going to take sides. This thread should focus on taking care of the current situation. sonicareAgreed so when does nominations and voting start?
Just fill the open spot. We had one bad officer, it happens. The rest of you guys are doing great. I say we just skip the elections and put me in officer place right now :).Wasdie:lol:
Quite the confidence.
Just fill the open spot. We had one bad officer, it happens. The rest of you guys are doing great. I say we just skip the elections and put me in officer place right now :).Wasdie
I'd vote for you if you bothered showering us with Necro love in Diablo 2. I demand an army of undead warriors to compliment my army of wolves and crows!
Bastard. :evil:
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment