Call Of Duty WWII vs Battlefield 1. ?

Avatar image for james47
#1 Posted by James47 (188 posts) -

Which game has the best Graphics. ?
Which game has the best Multiplayer. ?
Which game has longer Campaign. ?
Which game has the best Storyline. ?

The game that has at least 4 things right, wins.

Avatar image for gmak2442
#3 Posted by GMAK2442 (912 posts) -

The graphics of BF1 are better. But for the gameplay, it's a matter of taste I'd say.

For the campaign, I'm sure the one of BF1 is better because of the vehicles and the superior graphics.

Avatar image for james47
#4 Edited by James47 (188 posts) -

@gmak2442:

So in a nutshell Battlefield 1 wins the race, right. ?

Avatar image for gmak2442
#5 Posted by GMAK2442 (912 posts) -

@james47 said:

@gmak2442:

So in a nutshell Battlefield 1 wins the race, right. ?

For me yes. But for some other it could be no because they prefer the gameplay of COD.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
#6 Posted by R4gn4r0k (28170 posts) -

@james47 said:

Which game has the best Graphics. ?

Which game has the best Multiplayer. ?

Which game has longer Campaign. ?

Which game has the best Storyline. ?

The game that has at least 4 things right, wins.

No game wins really:

1. Battlefield has some amazing graphics and effects (like weather effects), it has the best physics and destroyable terrain. But WWII's graphics are really good too

2. Battlefield 1 by far has the better multiplayer, thanks to its class based system and great maps that work well in Operations and Frontlines game modes. COD WWII is a fun, but lighthearted twitch shooter. War mode is a must play if you play COD online.

3. COD WWII's campaign is longer and better

4. There is actually more story to be found in Battlefield 1's multiplayer (codexes, operations) than its singleplayer.

Avatar image for james47
#7 Edited by James47 (188 posts) -

@R4gn4r0k:

The way i see it is that Battlefield 1 wins, cause we ALL know that Battlefield games have good graphics, good physics and more realistic environment than COD games. Also we ALL saw the CODWWII trailer and we realized how fucked up the whole result was when we saw that the game was lower in graphics than the trailer we saw in the first place. In a nutshell Activision lied to us and mock us in front of our faces on the release date. This is not how you keep your customers near you, but no..."We love COD games and we still gonna buy them, even if they lie to us" WRONG.

Avatar image for drlostrib
#8 Posted by DrLostRib (4047 posts) -

Why are you asking this if you seem to already know your answer?

Avatar image for james47
#9 Posted by James47 (188 posts) -

@drlostrib:

Cause i wanna be really 100% convinced before i'm gonna buy any game.

Avatar image for drlostrib
#10 Posted by DrLostRib (4047 posts) -

@james47 said:

@drlostrib:

Cause i wanna be really 100% convinced before i'm gonna buy any game.

convinced of what?

Avatar image for james47
#11 Posted by James47 (188 posts) -

@drlostrib:

COD or Battlefield. ?

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
#12 Posted by R4gn4r0k (28170 posts) -

@james47: I honestly don't know of any trailers.

I only know what I know by playing Battlefield 1s beta and full game

And COD wwii's beta and full game

Both games look impressive, battlefield looks better

Avatar image for Treflis
#13 Posted by Treflis (13488 posts) -

@james47 said:

@drlostrib:

Cause i wanna be really 100% convinced before i'm gonna buy any game.

So you are going to let complete strangers who do not know you convince you of which game suits your taste more?
In that case, Ditch them both and get "Sid Meier's SimGolf"

Avatar image for CTR360
#14 Posted by CTR360 (8555 posts) -

Cod WW2 its better game for me

Avatar image for sukraj
#15 Posted by sukraj (27706 posts) -

@CTR360 said:

Cod WW2 its better game for me

I prefer COD WW2 TOO

Avatar image for james47
#16 Posted by James47 (188 posts) -

@Treflis:

Not my type.

Avatar image for saiducc
#17 Edited by SaiDucc (2 posts) -

I just refunded my WWII COD. Way too buggy, hitches and most importantly TERRIBLE MAPS, lack of guns and even worse kill streaks. And finally they removed Aim Assist :|

Avatar image for hxce
#18 Edited by hxce (2098 posts) -

WW2 is like lasertag or paintball playing multiplayer. All the matches gets very similar.

BF1 has a much higher dynamic with all the shit that can happen because of the mapdestruction, vehicles and 64 players...it feels like war.

Avatar image for killerfurries
#19 Posted by Killerfurries (6 posts) -

Why not both?

Avatar image for narlymech
#20 Posted by narlymech (1541 posts) -

They both can scratch a certain itch. But, BF1 would be the best choice. BF1 is much deeper and COD doesn't last me very long with the mp.

Avatar image for SoAmazingBaby
#21 Posted by SoAmazingBaby (3020 posts) -

Its two different experiences.

Avatar image for vfighter
#23 Posted by VFighter (3400 posts) -

It's not even close, BF1 by miles. When I started playing it with my friends and brother we all said the samething after the first few matches, this is what COD would feel like if it every actually evolved or get a new generation engine and not the old ass quake 2 one it's used forever

Avatar image for everydaygaming
#24 Posted by EverydayGaming (7 posts) -

Everything: BF 1 !!!