Alright game,could be better.The things I would change will be the graphics.But otherwise this game is good.
To be fair, Conflict: Denied Ops is not looking to recreate a realistic war. This is a guilty pleasure from start to finish. A spattering of foul language is tossed in to highlight the over the top action. It's a bit like Soldier of Fortune, only substitute explosive barrels for the gore effects. Aside from the structural elements, almost everything in the environment can be shot to bits and your enemies simply love to leave oil-filled items in convenient (for you) places. The game exists to let you shoot things in the face and blow stuff up and doesn't really pretend to be much else.
There are a few design choices in Denied Ops that some people might find a bit limiting. The first is that the game is designed entirely around the long range/close combat dichotomy that the two characters' weapons of choice present. Graves has a sniper and Lang has an assault rifle. Each get new upgrades and weapon options as the game progresses, but you can't drop the gun you have and pick up another. What you start the mission with is what you'll close it out with. The only weapon management required is seeking out ammo dumps to refill your munitions.
Still, the shooting mechanics of Conflict: Denied Ops work just fine, as does the limited amount of vehicular combat. The game won't win any awards for its graphics, particularly the animations, but it does have a good amount of destructible environments and "next-gen" effects like heat warping what you see and HDR lighting. These manage to keep the game from looking completely outdated, even if it can't keep up with the huge budgets the blockbusters have.