I am very dissappointed with this game and wish I could get my $60 back.It's lame compared to COD4, and even seems lacking compared to COD2. The camera movements associated with interacting with the environment is dumbed down a lot, so much so that it feels like I am floating through the maps and levels. The weapons recoil is atrocious. Instead of a hard snap that realistically imitates firing a weapon, such as in COD4, I get a pathetic weapon nod. The weapons sounds are unrealistic. The weapon actions and appearances seem unrealistic and cartoony. The hardcore mode is a joke compared to COD4. The only good things about this game are the wide open levels and some of the ambient sound effects. I wish that I had not spent $60 on this game. I'm probably going to shelf it and continue to play COD4 until something better comes along. STICK TO REALISM DEVELOPERS!
Other Helpful Reviews for Call of Duty: World at War
It would be hard to immediately identify something as a World War II game with the absence of Nazis. In fact, the absence of Nazis is what potentially could have led Treyarch's latest iteration of the Call of Duty franch... Read Full Review
The Call of Duty franchise has once again returned to it's World War II roots. This release pays respect to the Pacific Theatre of Operations and delves once again back into the major conflicts of the Eastern Front. T... Read Full Review
