My only hesitation about this is MS's absolutely jackassery when it comes to how they network everything together from a user interface-system-whatever standpoint. I'm not sure what you want to call it but they just seem to be terrible at getting various systems to talk to eachother and work together.
I see this at my job with Teams and Sharepoint and Outlook, and I see this with my games with how things on Gamepass don't mesh with things on Steam (for example, WH40K Darktide users on GP not being able to play with users on Steam and cross-platform not working and shit like that).
If MS can somehow work that out, I'd be fine with this. And I know they're a big evil corporation but honestly they have the talent and resources to do it, I just don't see why they don't.
@Zero_epyon said:
https://wccftech.com/xbox-next-reference-design/
The Xbox Next is going to be a very different gaming device compared to its predecessors, according to rumors circulating online.
According to Windows Central's Jez Corden, Microsoft's next-generation console will likely be a reference device with a heavy Windows slant for manufacturers to make their own devices, like the Surface Pro 11 is a reference device for AI PCs. This would be a huge departure from the previous Xbox consoles, as it would essentially make it a PC that could potentially run Steam games as well, and thus even the former PlayStation exclusives available on Valve's digital store like Ghost of Tsushima: Director's Cut and God of War.
If true, this would mean that Xbox is following the 3DO model. I don't know who this would be for though. Console games want a console, not a mini PC. PC players don't want a mini PC that's console like. Steam already tried this and it failed spectacularly.
But this is something I expected them to do ever since that FTC leak. If Xbox is to survive another gen, it won't be a traditional console. It'd be that cloud hybrid (an even worse idea if you ask me) or license the Xbox brand to other manufacturers.
You're missing one key point, however: going from PC to console is a downgrade; going from console to a not-quite-PC-but-almost experience is a huge upgrade.
This is a smart move, a win-win for the consumer. MS has nothing to lose buy making their console my fluid between being a console and a PC and using different distribution tools (Steam, Game Pass, GoG, etc) to sell games.
The whole myth over PC being user unfriendly or hard to use or unable to use in your living room is long dead and it would be an easy gap to bridge.
TBH I'm not really sure what MS in particular gains from this but in the end so long as they're moving copies of games, selling subscriptions, and getting their hardware out there, it doesn't really matter if it's an xbox or a tablet or a PC or what have you.
I don't think anyone should be panicking, at least. So let's all calm down mmkay?
@Pedro said:
Runs PC and Xbox games but in a compact size and can be made by multiple companies? Sounds like a great direction to me.
But, I understand that competition is bad for some people.😏
Look, if I want to argue against my own self-interests and indulge my cognitive dissonance, I'm going to do so, god dammit.
Log in to comment