sick n' tired of bad reviewers!!!!

User Rating: 7 | World in Conflict (Collector's Edition) PC
GAMESPOT STOP GIVING UNBELIEVABLE SCORES TO ORDINARY GAMES!!! there... I said it. Not that the game is a total loss but certainely not 9.5 come on!

It's an RTS, meaning you don't play turns and if you take too long to take your decisions or survey the battlefield, you get blown to bits by the commies. Instead of the base building we're used to in, say, C&C franchises (which IMO is way better than this attempt), your given a set amount of units at the start of a mission and with a point system, can call in reinforcements at your selected drop zone. What is horrifying in that concept is the amount of time it takes to be able to call in more reinforcement to replace lost ones... and believe me, when the battle gets hot (because like all RTS games, WIC's level of difficulty is only just the freakin' AI who outnumbers you by way far) especially during those famous ''defend the outpost'' missions, your pretty much screwed if you don't act fast... and chances are the time it takes to be able to get those stupid reinforcements will contribute to that. What's interesting though is the ability to use tactical aids... although you have to be quick to direct them on the battlefield at the same time as trying to repel the Reds with your puny task force. Anyway, this game won't make me steer off Red Alert 3... which I'm going to play right now.

oh... and did I say to stop giving unrepresentative scores to games?