"I don't know whether Fire Emblem will have many more games in the future"
Why would they stop making it when they could milk the ever living crap out of it after attracting an entire horde of waifu-hugging drones since Awakening?

Either way, a new crossover IP would be nice.
Probably something like Super Robot Wars to appeal to the RPG fans?

Geez, as long as they don't add another Type.
Just returned to Pokemon and I have trouble remembering all the weaknesses and strengths of the existing types as it is - not to mention getting used to all these "Mega Evolution" and "Fairy" types to boot.

@imjust1joe: Considering Spider-Man's involvement in the Civil War, yeah he's gonna need his powers.
Wonder how Iron Man fans (of the films) would react when they realise that Tony Stark's a dick though.

@Uvtha: Marvel's filled with poor decisions after the 90s TBH. (and several crappy decisions were made in the 80s too)
They've completely threw away what the fans knew and love by doing some really pathetic retcons, tossing Peter's life back into the social wreck it was in the 60s-70s, wrecked his wedding because a few dudes up there didn't like MJ, tarnished Gwen's image by making her the mom of two gobbies (What's with Marvel and their fetish with weird, convoluted sexual sub-plots?) and more.

Can't they go back to the good ol' writing style of the earlier Marvel comics where the writers weren't a bunch of try-hards trying to make the comics as "edgy and dark" as possible?

@imjust1joe: Yeah but no one wants to see another "origins" film anymore. (Pretty sure the new Spidey film is just gonna skip that one out)

As for a Future Foundation film - yeah, considering the latest film flop but we could always just pretend that never exists.

@turtlesintime: Yeah, that was the most derp-worthy part of the trilogy.... along with "annoyingly needy MJ" - which was more of a "director" thing to be honest.

What we really need is a perfect Spider-Man film based on the earlier comics - going through the keypoints of Peter's development as an individual along with it's more obscure villains like Molten Man or Big Man and featuring a more well-paced writing on character development. (Like in the comics where Peter mistook infatuation for love)

The original trilogy did capture some key aspects of Peter's development though - like the train scene.

(Which, IMO, is the film's equivalent of the scene where Peter nearly drowned after fighting against Doc Ock - Steve Ditko deserves far more credit for his work)

@txuzai: In what way?

"It's not going to be an epic thing; it's going to be a film surrounded by these incredible things, but that follows this boy and his life. Peter Parker is a favorite of many because everyone can relate to him, and we're going to try to make everyone relate to our Peter Parker."

... Yeah, I think we all know that from Day 1 - Spidey was made to be relatable to after all.

Seriously though, can't they just reboot the old trilogy and bring back Tobey or something?

Or is it yet another one of those "whose Spider-Man belongs to which studio" kind of crap again?

Also - a Future Foundation film please.
A superhero group of intellectuals is better than a superhero group filled with smartasses.

"go beyond the story, world, and experience of Final Fantasy 7 in ways we've always dreamed of"
Just tell me that Nomura's emo Cloud (and SE's recent trend of bad writing) isn't part of that dream and I may just buy it.

Another well-polished strike against bad DLCs.

CDPR and Techland's dev teams must be drinking buddies or something.