[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

[QUOTE="StealthKnife"] please name 1 xbl exclusive that has dedicated, they is none, MS fees are not going to "give better servers" its all p2p i believe they are some nonexclusive dedicated like the orange box, but i might be wrong, ive never played it. StealthKnife

Perfect Dark has both i believe, but that's not the point im making. Xbox Live, and PSN have nothing to dow ith online quality, the devs host the servers, not Xbox Live or PSN. Nothing hold Xbox Live back from having more dedicated servers. And why are we all of a sudden only talking about exclusive games that use them? Just to have the edge i imagine.

I'm tired of this.

These nubs don't understand network typology at all. Dedicated servers do not act well for anything outside of the game. Try to listen to someone's headset on a PSN game. You suffer massive packet loss about once ever 15 seconds. Xbox Live? Doesn't even cut out. And let's not even talk about the PSN game crashes. If one node starts fail in Halo 3, then that player either lags horribly and is booted. If just the tiniest bit of packet loss occurs on KZ2, everyone gets disconnected.

Learn network typology. Learn the pros and cons. By saying Dedicated is better than P2P, you are saying Xenos is better Cell, because they basically act in a similiar manner.

I mean, obviously. They know the #1 way for the west to hone the marksmanship skills of children is VIDEO GAMING. I wouldn't be suprised if their was an Al Qaeda mole in Ensemble studios to make Halo Wars suck.

I would not be suprised at all.

Jago betting the entire hermit block Doom 3 would flop, going against all logic known to man.

Doom 3 flops.

By far the most epic ownage ever.

The Darkness really just craps all over everything with its story.

have you play halo3 campaign ? there nothing like the battle with the two scarabs and the hornet in killzone2 . legol1

IMO, Halo 3's single player was extremely fun, at times frantic and had a solid story plot. The only downside is that we've done this twice before with Halo and Halo 2. Multiplayer is so good it's in a league of it's own.

9.0

IMO, Killzone 2 single player story was excessively boring, lacked shootout variety, lacked serious enemy variety, it just flatly lacked variety compared to Halo 3. The gunplay was not enough to keep me intrigued. However, lacking as it may be, it was a new experience and an overall solid game. Multiplayer is solid, but it's not the best.

8.0

This thread is going to pan out something like this.

Cows will say KZ2.

Lemmings will say Gears 2.

Hermits will say "lolconsoles"

Sheep will say "teh sales".

I will say Mirror's Edge. It was just simply the most eye pleasing game to date.

[QUOTE="Morning_Revival"]Trash talk any game all you want, as long as youve actually played it. If you havent played a game and youre still trash talking about it, then you just look like a fool. And quit it with this "adds nothing to the genre" crap. The only game that has came out this generation that actually did something for a genre was Little Big Planet, and possibly Mirrors Edge.Rhubarb9

now, lets stay on-topic, wanna hype some x360 exclusives AAA?

Splinter Cell Conviction (AAA franchise except on PS3)

Kingdom Under Fire II (Hopefully it goes back to it's roots. RTS/Hack & Slash/Adventure = AAA)

[QUOTE="Morning_Revival"]

[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]

Halo Wars is a weak RTS with no depth, It's a 6.5 game, Jenkis opinion is correct
If caine enjoy the game cause of the halo universe that's fine but a tie in to a good franchise doesn't automatically make it a good game
no matter what

Rhubarb9