[QUOTE="twinsfan12"][QUOTE="obsolete2k1"]

If, as in most Western nations, abortion is legal, should euthanasia also be legal and accessable?

braindead_hero

****, why not just let people run around with guns and kill people?

so, no

Wow I facepalmed so hard it hurt

why, its still killing people,

why are you for it

If, as in most Western nations, abortion is legal, should euthanasia also be legal and accessable?

obsolete2k1

****, why not just let people run around with guns and kill people?

so, no

why do guys come here for fashion advice?

my advice, take a chick and have her pick the best one

none of the images are showing up, which end is the problem at

I plan on studying engineering after I graduate from High School this year. Which field should I go into? I have an interest in engineering in general, so I'm not really leaning towards one field or another. thanks.-AK47-

im assuming your american so, http://www.bls.gov/oco/oco1002.htm the site will give good details about the fields

personally i would pick a field that sounds fun

With the rates of teen and unwanted pregnancy, STIs, etc, should unprotected sex be a crime before a certain age?

I'm not talking about the logistics of enforcing such a crime, but merely asking if it would be a good idea to help curb unwanted pregnancy and the spread of diseases.

obsolete2k1

no, its their choice if they want to do it and they should know the potential reprocussions that could happen

btw what age where you thinking?

It is a super power... your "modern" textbooks, aren't very modern.diped

no it isnt but it does have potential,

According to Lyman Miller, "The basic components of superpower stature may be measured along four axes of power: military, economic, political, and cultural" id give it mil and econ, but not political or cultural for lack of democracy or any acceptable form of gov and horrible human rights standards

After seeing sony new eye pet I was wonder if you can fight and train your pets. Basically similar to a pokemen but online. We all know nintendo suck at online for consoles. It would be cool if someone made a good game were you can battle/train your pets but with eye pet ideas.ff7isnumbaone

sony could create a new slogan about it: "Sony, We create thousands of little Michael Vicks."

if you couldnt tell, i dont think so

[QUOTE="twinsfan12"]bolded: because people still have guns, illegal ones, how do you prpose we get rid of all of the guns, if you can give me a good plan to remove all guns from the face of the planet (because that is what you need to do and nothing short of it) i will fully support it, deny any of my previous beliefs about guns were good, and make sure the plan gets followed out, so whats your plan? im serious Ninja-Hippo

I didn't propose removing all guns from the planet. That's again just taking a point to rediculous extremes. Amateur debating.

And i wont indulge it any further.

im being serious, you said you want all guns gone, so how do we go about that?

[QUOTE="twinsfan12"]

"I think guns end up being used to kill people by people who dont intend to do so or do so out of anger or spare-of-the-moment decision making, eq that guy is robbing my car, i'm goin to grab my gun, this guy is cheating on my wife, i'm going to grab my gun etc. Situations which may not result in someone being shot and killed had a gun not been on hand."

in those situations, removing guns doesnt necessarily save someones life, if my wife was cheating on me, i could still kill someone with an other object, a knife, a lamp, or whatever, if someone was robbing my car i could kill him with a tire iron, so removing guns doesnt necessarily save anyone,

how can you refute the crime rates in dc increasing with the banning of guns and that removing guns creates more crime? what is the logic behind that

Ninja-Hippo

That's you. That's not society. Like i said earlier, someone broke into my apartment and i managed to stop them with a pool queue. Had it been another person at another time with a gun at their side he could well have ended up dead. That's my whole point; where a gun is present lies the chance that the gun will be used and a person could end up being killed who would not have been had that gun not been there.

Disagree if you like; at least you've stopped demanding links to what is just my belief. my problem with it was that you were bringing it out as a fact, your sentance started with its a fact or something along those lines I think if you take away the guns, there are a lot of situations where someone MAY have grabbed a gun in anger or frustration and killed a person which would not happen with no guns so readily available.

As for removing guns creates more crime? Where is that a fact? :? Why would removing guns ever create MORE crime?

bolded: because people still have guns, illegal ones, how do you prpose we get rid of all of the guns, if you can give me a good plan to remove all guns from the face of the planet (because that is what you need to do and nothing short of it) i will fully support it, deny any of my previous beliefs about guns were good, and make sure the plan gets followed out, so whats your plan? im serious

"I think guns end up being used to kill people by people who dont intend to do so or do so out of anger or spare-of-the-moment decision making, eq that guy is robbing my car, i'm goin to grab my gun, this guy is cheating on my wife, i'm going to grab my gun etc. Situations which may not result in someone being shot and killed had a gun not been on hand."

in those situations, removing guns doesnt necessarily save someones life, if my wife was cheating on me, i could still kill someone with an other object, a knife, a lamp, or whatever, if someone was robbing my car i could kill him with a tire iron, so removing guns doesnt necessarily save anyone,

how can you refute the crime rates in dc increasing with the banning of guns and that removing guns creates more crime? what is the logic behind that