Without turning this into a TitanFall discussion, your wrong. You have to play the game to understand but it is nothing like playing call of duty.

I believe the XBOX has more upswing, the only reason for this is because of the companies backing each system. Sony financially just cannot compete with Microsoft. I can see the infrastructure of the system coming a apart before the system has any faults. That said on to the system themselves.

It seems to me that the XBOX one does what it was designed to do however the developers were not on the same page when it comes to game creation. If you take a linear pipeline approach it is far easier to develop games for the PS4. I also think power is not the right term, people say that the PS4 is more powerful when that is not the case. The PS4 has a higher potential ceiling to create higher fidelity graphics. The common factor here is the actual development teams and their timelines, talent, and ability to produce, I think Kojima was either rushed or was forced to output a game that would play on the microsoft platform. Just an example.

Seriously guys parallax occlusion mapping is not that special. Im not sure why your parading it around like its some magnificent new feature. When I create models with Zbrush for games normal mapping generally gets most of the work done. I take it most of you don't model or anything so your picking a particular aspect of procedural textures to make it sound like a standout feature.

Did someone really try and compare parallax mapping with texture filtering?

what is a lemm?

Here I bolded it for you, originally his argument is that xbox fans claim to have a better lineup of games. It wasn't until he listed the "rules" for his thread that he decided to add stipulations to the thread. My only point is that if you want to argue the validity of a statement made by a select group of gamers why is it that you must impose stipulations on the argument?

And I'm asking these questions because your thread doesn't make sense for a real conversation about games. It absolutely makes sense if this is a troll thread however I thought you intended to have an actual discussion.

Yes listed exclusives are the key words there its a game of words. Also why decide to not list the games that are out and exclusive now? I don't see how that changes the argument. The Question I pose is which system will have the most games at the end of 2014?The only rule is that the game cannot appear on both systems.

Well the original parameters for you discussion distinctly slant the outcome towards playstation is this intentional?

This is confusing, your point is to discuss the game lineups but you want to limit the pool of actual games to those that favor the playstation? For instance why don't you adjust the rules to games not found on both systems? That would give you an accurate portrayal of the line up for the system. If you don't see this then this is a thread designed for a bias outlook.

Hi I'm new here if this is how this forum works disregard.