sarmini's forum posts

Avatar image for sarmini
sarmini

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 sarmini
Member since 2007 • 2420 Posts

I love collection and set up threads!

Xbox 360-
Call of Duty 4
Halo 3
Turok
Mass Effect

Playstation 3-
Resistance

Playstation 2-
Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty
Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater

Playstation-
Metal Gear Solid
Alien Trilogy

PC-
Aliens Vs Predator: Gold Edition
Aliens Vs Predator 2

Avatar image for sarmini
sarmini

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 sarmini
Member since 2007 • 2420 Posts
[QUOTE="lockjaw333"][QUOTE="JaptainCack"][QUOTE="lockjaw333"][QUOTE="briand07"]

Achivements are for losers imo.

JaptainCack

Okay. And if that was Sony's idea you'd be all over it and citing it as a reason PSN is so much better. Having had experience playing on both, Xbox Live is light years better. That's not to say PSN can't improve, but Xbox Live is a way better online service right now.

He's not citing that XBL is stupid because of achievments. He's saying, which I agree to, that you guys are paying your monthly fees simply for achievments. Whereas PSN provides everything XBL does, as an online GAMING service, which lets not forget is the entire point, for FREE. You are paying your fees merely for the extra little features, not for a better gaming service itself.

Maybe its because you haven't had the chance to use it, but I think you're ignoring the most important aspect of Xbox Live- the community features. The ease with which you can invite a friend into a game, or join their game in progress is awesome. Its just so easy to coordinate things and make sure you're always playing with friends, makes the experience more enjoyable. It feels more like a connected community than PSN. I could care less about dashboard themes, gamer pictures, and all that jazz, but its definitely some nice icing for people who are into it. But connectivity and community are the main reasons Xbox Live is so great.

Sony is releasing a in-game XMB support along with home. So you will be able to invite friends to your games, see friends who are online, send messages, have a message inbox etc etc. just like Live. Infact you can do all that now you just can't do it in game. But since Sony is releasing this soon there's no argument about this. So we will be getting the same features that you claim makes Live wonderful, for free. M$ needs to release a base version of their service that will provide simple onlien gaming for FREE, and then allow people to pay extra if they want extra. But they are too greedy, hell, trying playing GOW on PC. They are trying to move their BS service onto PC games so PC gamers will have to pay extra to play otherwise free online games! GREED is disgusting.

Sorry to interrupt you 2's pathetic arguing but is Sony really coming out with an in game XMB? I heard it was rumored but I didnt know it was confirmed. Awesome.

And btw, I agree with the other user. Xbox Live community is fantastic and easy to use. While I use both, I prefer Xbox Live way more than PSN. I think its easier, and definatly has a better interface.

Avatar image for sarmini
sarmini

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 sarmini
Member since 2007 • 2420 Posts

Youre a pathetic individual.

Oh yeah, Xbox Live >>>>> PSN.

I havent even turned my PS3 on for several weeks. My 360's on atleast once everyday.

Avatar image for sarmini
sarmini

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 sarmini
Member since 2007 • 2420 Posts
[QUOTE="sarmini"]

Lol, I completely disagree.

Gears was a really fun, small tactics shooter. Yes, not a good story but Im sure they'll change that with Gears 2.

Halo 3 over-rated mediocre game. Horrible campaign (5 hours? Wtf) good MP but horrible ranking system and broken melee system.

PBSnipes
Wait, you're ripping Halo 3's campaign for length? Its not the longest game eve made, but Halo 3 is certainly longer than Gears.

Gears took me longer than Halo 3. They both have short campaigns, but 5 hours is just pathetic.
Avatar image for sarmini
sarmini

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 sarmini
Member since 2007 • 2420 Posts

Lol, I completely disagree.

Gears was a really fun, small tactics shooter. Yes, not a good story but Im sure they'll change that with Gears 2.

Halo 3 over-rated mediocre game. Horrible campaign (5 hours? Wtf) good MP but horrible ranking system and broken melee system.

Edit- Wtf, you dont even have a 360. Shut up fanboy

Avatar image for sarmini
sarmini

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 sarmini
Member since 2007 • 2420 Posts
Rick... You sound like a huge fanboy
Avatar image for sarmini
sarmini

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 sarmini
Member since 2007 • 2420 Posts

Im thinking its Resistance: Fall of Man.

Resistance 2: United We Fall (Rumored title, sounds good IMO) is located in the U.S. The area in that clip was Norther Command from R:FoM in the U.K.

Avatar image for sarmini
sarmini

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 sarmini
Member since 2007 • 2420 Posts
Whats the update for? I havent turned my PS3 on in several weeks.
Avatar image for sarmini
sarmini

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 sarmini
Member since 2007 • 2420 Posts
I really want it.
Avatar image for sarmini
sarmini

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 sarmini
Member since 2007 • 2420 Posts

Ive never even heard about Cry On

Atfirst I thought you were talking about Far Cry.