"squarejp Posted Dec 22, 2008 10:35 pm GMT Ocphon, you are true about depending on devs to optimize for the system. But sorry to dissapoint you but deadspace is not running at 1080P...... 720P with 1080P signal to your HDTV..... MGS4 is really made for PS3. So does Gears of War 2. I love both games. The graphics are supurb for their respective systems. When the game is made for that particular console and the dev worked hard on it, yes you have good results. I totally agree with you but PS3 and XBOX 360 in terms of current multi platform games, I don't think dev are actually doing justice on PS3's hardware. It's the reality that development on PS3 is harder than XBOX 360. That's why we can't see good results in general for PS3 except good exclusives. It's sad but it's the reality we PS3 owners have to face." i know deadspace is 720p. when i said 1080p i meant mgs4. all i'm saying is before people trash the ps3's graphics they need to play mgs4. that's it. when people trashed the gamecube i recommended resident evil 4. every console is good.. it's just the developers. right now 360 is the hot console so the pc and ps3 will get the ports. i think it's wack/stupid trying to compare a game on different systems. these comparisons never factor in the developers effort on one system compared to the next.
any gamer should know pc is the stronger of the three.. ps3 is next in line and then the 360. it's all hardware. idk why people are still comparing game graphics between the three.. it's all dependent on the game developers not the pc or consoles. if the developers do a poor job it's not the consoles' fault the graphics aren't up to par. i have a ps3 and deadspace looks way better than the screen shots you put up. turn up the brightness so you can actually see some details.. and check out mgs4! that's 1080p! then again pc can handle higher resolution.
ocphon's comments